Stentless pediatric robotic pyeloplasty.

Alejandro R Rodriguez, Mark A Rich, Hubert S Swana
Author Information

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Open dismembered pyeloplasty remains the standard of care for the correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. We describe our experience with a tubeless, stentless pediatric robotic pyeloplasty technique.
METHODS: Between October 2008 and September 2009, 12 consecutive children underwent robotic dismembered pyeloplasty. Ureteral stents or nephrostomy tubes were not used. Operative time, hospital stay, days of Jackson-Pratt drainage, and complications were analyzed. Postoperative renal ultrasonography was obtained at 4-6 weeks after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 9.1 years (3.5-16). The mean operative and console times were 178 (122-250) and 129 (96-193) minutes, respectively. The Jackson-Pratt drain was removed after a mean of 1.8 days (1-4). The mean hospital stay was 2.4 days (1-4.5). There were no complications. Mean follow up was 16 months (12-24 months). All patients had complete resolution of symptoms. hydronephrosis either completely resolved or significantly decreased in all cases. In cases without complete resolution of hydronephrosis, 99m Tc-MAG-3 diuretic renography showed preservation of renal function without obstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty can be safely performed without internal indwelling stent drainage. In children, this avoids the need for additional anesthesia and stent-related morbidity.

Keywords

References

  1. Urology. 2006 May;67(5):932-6 [PMID: 16635516]
  2. J Urol. 2002 Sep;168(3):1127-30 [PMID: 12187251]
  3. Br J Urol. 1949 Sep;21(3):209-14 [PMID: 18148283]
  4. JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):8-13 [PMID: 17651549]
  5. Br J Urol. 1994 Jan;73(1):87-9 [PMID: 8298904]
  6. Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):1199-202 [PMID: 18372013]
  7. J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):583-6; discussion 586-7 [PMID: 19335333]
  8. J Endourol. 2008 Jun;22(6):1199-202 [PMID: 18484889]
  9. J Urol. 2004 Apr;171(4):1440-2 [PMID: 15017193]
  10. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):720-5; discussion 725 [PMID: 17222666]
  11. Int Braz J Urol. 2011 May-Jun;37(3):419; discussion 420 [PMID: 21879503]
  12. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1065-9; discussion 1069 [PMID: 12576847]
  13. BJU Int. 2009 Mar;103(6):844-7 [PMID: 19260855]
  14. BJU Int. 2000 Mar;85(4):408-11 [PMID: 10691815]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pyeloplastymeanchildrenpediatricroboticdayswithoutdismemberedobstructionhospitalstayJackson-Prattdrainagecomplicationsrenal11-4monthscompleteresolutioncasesOBJECTIVES:OpenremainsstandardcarecorrectionureteropelvicjunctiondescribeexperiencetubelessstentlesstechniqueMETHODS:October2008September200912consecutiveunderwentUreteralstentsnephrostomytubesusedOperativetimeanalyzedPostoperativeultrasonographyobtained4-6weekssurgeryRESULTS:patientage9years35-16operativeconsoletimes178122-25012996-193minutesrespectivelydrainremoved8245Meanfollow1612-24patientssymptomsHydronephrosiseithercompletelyresolvedsignificantlydecreasedhydronephrosis99mTc-MAG-3diureticrenographyshowedpreservationfunctionCONCLUSIONS:Robot-assistedlaparoscopiccansafelyperformedinternalindwellingstentavoidsneedadditionalanesthesiastent-relatedmorbidityStentlesslaparoscopyrobotics

Similar Articles

Cited By