Construction of vascular tissues with macro-porous nano-fibrous scaffolds and smooth muscle cells enriched from differentiated embryonic stem cells.

Jiang Hu, Changqing Xie, Haiyun Ma, Bo Yang, Peter X Ma, Y Eugene Chen
Author Information
  1. Jiang Hu: Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Abstract

Vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) have been broadly used for constructing tissue-engineered blood vessels. However, the availability of mature SMCs from donors or patients is very limited. Derivation of SMCs by differentiating embryonic stem cells (ESCs) has been reported, but not widely utilized in vascular tissue engineering due to low induction efficiency and, hence, low SMC purity. To address these problems, SMCs were enriched from retinoic acid induced mouse ESCs with LacZ genetic labeling under the control of SM22α promoter as the positive sorting marker in the present study. The sorted SMCs were characterized and then cultured on three-dimensional macro-porous nano-fibrous scaffolds in vitro or implanted subcutaneously into nude mice after being seeded on the scaffolds. Our data showed that the LacZ staining, which reflected the corresponding SMC marker SM22α expression level, was efficient as a positive selection marker to dramatically enrich SMCs and eliminate other cell types. After the sorted cells were seeded into the three-dimensional nano-fibrous scaffolds, continuous retinoic acid treatment further enhanced the SMC marker gene expression level while inhibited pluripotent maker gene expression level during the in vitro culture. Meanwhile, after being implanted subcutaneously into nude mice, the implanted cells maintained the positive LacZ staining within the constructs and no teratoma formation was observed. In conclusion, our results demonstrated the potential of SMCs derived from ESCs as a promising cell source for therapeutic vascular tissue engineering and disease model applications.

References

  1. Circ Res. 2004 May 14;94(9):1195-202 [PMID: 15059931]
  2. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Apr;17(4):2266-78 [PMID: 9121477]
  3. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999 Dec 3;385(2-3):287-90 [PMID: 10607888]
  4. J Biol Chem. 2010 Mar 26;285(13):9383-9389 [PMID: 20118242]
  5. Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):713-20 [PMID: 20535200]
  6. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004 Dec;287(6):C1560-8 [PMID: 15306544]
  7. J Control Release. 2006 May 1;112(1):103-10 [PMID: 16516328]
  8. Stem Cells. 2006 Jul;24(7):1678-88 [PMID: 16601077]
  9. J Cell Biol. 1998 May 4;141(3):805-14 [PMID: 9566978]
  10. Biomaterials. 2008 Apr;29(10):1464-72 [PMID: 18155136]
  11. Development. 1996 Aug;122(8):2415-25 [PMID: 8756287]
  12. Circ Res. 1995 Sep;77(3):445-65 [PMID: 7641318]
  13. Stem Cells Dev. 2009 Jun;18(5):741-8 [PMID: 18795840]
  14. Biomaterials. 2011 Jul;32(19):4369-75 [PMID: 21439638]
  15. J Vasc Surg. 2001 Mar;33(3):628-38 [PMID: 11241137]
  16. Physiol Rev. 2004 Jul;84(3):767-801 [PMID: 15269336]
  17. Stem Cells Dev. 2011 Feb;20(2):205-10 [PMID: 20799856]
  18. Biomaterials. 2010 Nov;31(31):7971-7 [PMID: 20673997]
  19. J Cell Biol. 1996 Mar;132(5):849-59 [PMID: 8603917]
  20. Cytometry. 1997 May 1;28(1):36-41 [PMID: 9136753]
  21. Circ Res. 2010 Apr 30;106(8):1351-62 [PMID: 20224039]
  22. Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Oct;21(10):1200-7 [PMID: 14502203]
  23. Nature. 2000 Nov 2;408(6808):92-6 [PMID: 11081514]
  24. J Physiol. 2002 Apr 1;540(Pt 1):139-52 [PMID: 11927676]
  25. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Dec 15;351(2):321-7 [PMID: 17069765]
  26. Circ Res. 1996 Feb;78(2):188-95 [PMID: 8575061]
  27. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003 Sep;285(3):H1190-7 [PMID: 12763749]
  28. Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Feb;21(4):1336-44 [PMID: 11158319]
  29. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2010;2(1):12-9 [PMID: 20428474]

Grants

  1. R01 DE017689/NIDCR NIH HHS
  2. DE017689/NIDCR NIH HHS
  3. R01 HL068878/NHLBI NIH HHS
  4. HL092421/NHLBI NIH HHS
  5. DE015384/NIDCR NIH HHS
  6. HL068878/NHLBI NIH HHS
  7. R21 HL092421/NHLBI NIH HHS
  8. R01 DE015384/NIDCR NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Cell Differentiation
Cell Line
Embryonic Stem Cells
Male
Mice
Mice, Nude
Muscle, Smooth, Vascular
Nanofibers
Tissue Engineering
Tissue Scaffolds

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SMCscellsmarkerscaffoldsESCsvascularSMCLacZpositivenano-fibrousimplantedexpressionlevelsmoothmuscleembryonicstemtissueengineeringlowenrichedretinoicacidSM22αsortedthree-dimensionalmacro-porousvitrosubcutaneouslynudemiceseededstainingcellgeneVascularbroadlyusedconstructingtissue-engineeredbloodvesselsHoweveravailabilitymaturedonorspatientslimitedDerivationdifferentiatingreportedwidelyutilizeddueinductionefficiencyhencepurityaddressproblemsinducedmousegeneticlabelingcontrolpromotersortingpresentstudycharacterizedcultureddatashowedreflectedcorrespondingefficientselectiondramaticallyenricheliminatetypescontinuoustreatmentenhancedinhibitedpluripotentmakercultureMeanwhilemaintainedwithinconstructsteratomaformationobservedconclusionresultsdemonstratedpotentialderivedpromisingsourcetherapeuticdiseasemodelapplicationsConstructiontissuesdifferentiated

Similar Articles

Cited By