Insights into plant size-density relationships from models and agricultural crops.

Jianming Deng, Wenyun Zuo, Zhiqiang Wang, Zhexuan Fan, Mingfei Ji, Genxuan Wang, Jinzhi Ran, Changming Zhao, Jianquan Liu, Karl J Niklas, Sean T Hammond, James H Brown
Author Information
  1. Jianming Deng: State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

There is general agreement that competition for resources results in a tradeoff between plant mass, M, and density, but the mathematical form of the resulting thinning relationship and the mechanisms that generate it are debated. Here, we evaluate two complementary models, one based on the space-filling properties of canopy geometry and the other on the metabolic basis of resource use. For densely packed stands, both models predict that density scales as M(-3/4), energy use as M(0), and total biomass as M(1/4). Compilation and analysis of data from 183 populations of herbaceous crop species, 473 stands of managed tree plantations, and 13 populations of bamboo gave four major results: (i) At low initial planting densities, crops grew at similar rates, did not come into contact, and attained similar mature sizes; (ii) at higher initial densities, crops grew until neighboring plants came into contact, growth ceased as a result of competition for limited resources, and a tradeoff between density and size resulted in critical density scaling as M(-0.78), total resource use as M(-0.02), and total biomass as M(0.22); (iii) these scaling exponents are very close to the predicted values of M(-3/4), M(0), and M(1/4), respectively, and significantly different from the exponents suggested by some earlier studies; and (iv) our data extend previously documented scaling relationships for trees in natural forests to small herbaceous annual crops. These results provide a quantitative, predictive framework with important implications for the basic and applied plant sciences.

References

  1. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Jun;22(6):323-30 [PMID: 17399851]
  2. Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):122-6 [PMID: 9082983]
  3. Nature. 2007 Feb 1;445(7127):E9-10; discussion E10-1 [PMID: 17268426]
  4. Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):457-61 [PMID: 16437113]
  5. PLoS One. 2008 Mar 19;3(3):e1799 [PMID: 18350139]
  6. Ecol Lett. 2006 May;9(5):575-88 [PMID: 16643303]
  7. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Nov;140(3):476-86 [PMID: 19425097]
  8. Ann Bot. 2010 Oct;106(4):647-52 [PMID: 20643802]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 2;101(44):15661-3 [PMID: 15505224]
  10. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004 Nov;79(4):871-89 [PMID: 15682874]
  11. Am Nat. 2001 Oct;158(4):438-50 [PMID: 18707338]
  12. J Math Biol. 2005 Sep;51(3):333-54 [PMID: 15868195]
  13. Nature. 2001 Apr 5;410(6829):655-60 [PMID: 11287945]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 28;106(17):7040-5 [PMID: 19363160]
  15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 28;106(17):7046-51 [PMID: 19363161]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 26;107(4):1447-51 [PMID: 20080600]
  17. Science. 2002 Feb 22;295(5559):1517-20 [PMID: 11859193]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Sep 3;93(18):9980-4 [PMID: 11607703]

Grants

  1. /Howard Hughes Medical Institute

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Biomass
Crops, Agricultural
Ecosystem
Models, Biological
Plant Development
Population Density
Trees

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Mdensitycropsplantmodelsuse0totalscalingcompetitionresourcesresultstradeoffresourcestands-3/4biomass1/4datapopulationsherbaceousinitialdensitiesgrewsimilarcontact-0exponentsrelationshipsgeneralagreementmassmathematicalformresultingthinningrelationshipmechanismsgeneratedebatedevaluatetwocomplementaryonebasedspace-fillingpropertiescanopygeometrymetabolicbasisdenselypackedpredictscalesenergyCompilationanalysis183cropspecies473managedtreeplantations13bamboogavefourmajorresults:lowplantingratescomeattainedmaturesizesiihigherneighboringplantscamegrowthceasedresultlimitedsizeresultedcritical780222iiiclosepredictedvaluesrespectivelysignificantlydifferentsuggestedearlierstudiesivextendpreviouslydocumentedtreesnaturalforestssmallannualprovidequantitativepredictiveframeworkimportantimplicationsbasicappliedsciencesInsightssize-densityagricultural

Similar Articles

Cited By