Early and sustained supramarginal gyrus contributions to phonological processing.

Magdalena W Sliwinska, Manali Khadilkar, Jonathon Campbell-Ratcliffe, Frances Quevenco, Joseph T Devlin
Author Information
  1. Magdalena W Sliwinska: Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, University College London London, UK.

Abstract

Reading is a difficult task that, at a minimum, requires recognizing a visual stimulus and linking it with its corresponding sound and meaning. Neurologically, this involves an anatomically distributed set of brain regions cooperating to solve the problem. It has been hypothesized that the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) contributes preferentially to phonological aspects of word processing and thus plays an important role in visual word recognition. Here, we used chronometric transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the functional specificity and timing of SMG involvement in reading visually presented words. Participants performed tasks designed to focus on either the phonological, semantic, or visual aspects of written words while double pulses of TMS (delivered 40 ms apart) were used to temporarily interfere with neural information processing in the left SMG at five different time windows. Stimulation at 80/120, 120/160, and 160/200 ms post-stimulus onset significantly slowed subjects' reaction times in the phonological task. This inhibitory effect was specific to the phonological condition, with no effect of TMS in the semantic or visual tasks, consistent with claims that SMG contributes preferentially to phonological aspects of word processing. The fact that the effect began within 80-120 ms of the onset of the stimulus and continued for approximately 100 ms, indicates that phonological processing initiates early and is sustained over time. These findings are consistent with accounts of visual word recognition that posit parallel activation of orthographic, phonological, and semantic information that interact over time to settle into a distributed, but stable, representation of a word.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Psychophysiol. 1999 Jun;32(3):215-31 [PMID: 10437633]
  2. Cogn Psychol. 1986 Jan;18(1):1-86 [PMID: 3753912]
  3. Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(2):295-302 [PMID: 18822306]
  4. Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 18;17(18):1568-73 [PMID: 17764942]
  5. J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 2;29(35):10950-60 [PMID: 19726653]
  6. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Aug;32(8):1220-35 [PMID: 20665719]
  7. PLoS Biol. 2009 Aug;7(8):e1000170 [PMID: 19668354]
  8. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Mar;20(3):622-32 [PMID: 19571269]
  9. J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 14;30(15):5229-33 [PMID: 20392945]
  10. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Aug;12(1):153-9 [PMID: 11489618]
  11. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Sep;16(7):1234-49 [PMID: 15453976]
  12. Psychol Rev. 1980 Jul;87(4):329-54 [PMID: 7413885]
  13. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90 [PMID: 24203555]
  14. J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;94(1):622-39 [PMID: 15788519]
  15. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 May;29(3):481-8 [PMID: 12776758]
  16. Psychophysiology. 2009 Sep;46(5):1113-22 [PMID: 19515107]
  17. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jun;12(6):718-24 [PMID: 19471271]
  18. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 May;20(5):762-78 [PMID: 18201133]
  19. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;78(3):173-84 [PMID: 1707789]
  20. Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1021-6 [PMID: 17201781]
  21. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Mar;20(3):633-40 [PMID: 19561061]
  22. Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56 [PMID: 11212628]
  23. Behav Brain Funct. 2005 Apr 22;1(1):4 [PMID: 15953396]
  24. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jul;18(7):1147-55 [PMID: 16839288]
  25. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(12):2209-21 [PMID: 16842827]
  26. Brain Lang. 1984 Nov;23(2):225-40 [PMID: 6518354]
  27. Nature. 1988 Feb 18;331(6157):585-9 [PMID: 3277066]
  28. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jun;15(6):246-53 [PMID: 21549634]
  29. Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):1462-77 [PMID: 22281671]
  30. Neuroreport. 2000 May 15;11(7):1565-9 [PMID: 10841378]
  31. Psychol Rev. 1982 Jan;89(1):60-94 [PMID: 7058229]
  32. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 May;115(5):1090-103 [PMID: 15066535]
  33. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Oct;1(1):73-9 [PMID: 11252771]
  34. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Aug;48(10):3155-63 [PMID: 20600177]
  35. J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):727-33 [PMID: 23964595]
  36. Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 15;58(2):362-80 [PMID: 21718787]
  37. Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 1;55(3):1242-51 [PMID: 21232615]
  38. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Mar;31(3):365-77 [PMID: 19777554]
  39. Brain Lang. 2008 Nov;107(2):91-101 [PMID: 18226833]
  40. Psychol Rev. 1989 Oct;96(4):523-68 [PMID: 2798649]
  41. Neuroimage. 2004 Aug;22(4):1819-25 [PMID: 15275938]
  42. Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56 [PMID: 11516708]
  43. Brain. 2007 Mar;130(Pt 3):610-22 [PMID: 17138570]
  44. Cortex. 2009 Oct;45(9):1091-6 [PMID: 19232583]
  45. Biol Psychol. 2009 Jan;80(1):84-94 [PMID: 18456383]
  46. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039 [PMID: 19833552]
  47. Neuron. 2007 Nov 21;56(4):726-40 [PMID: 18031688]
  48. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Nov;23(3):140-55 [PMID: 15449358]
  49. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16494-9 [PMID: 20807747]
  50. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;15(1):71-84 [PMID: 12590844]
  51. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 5;31(1):193-9 [PMID: 21209204]
  52. Cereb Cortex. 1998 Oct-Nov;8(7):575-92 [PMID: 9823479]
  53. Neurosci Lett. 1994 Nov 21;182(1):25-8 [PMID: 7891880]
  54. J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 31;25(35):8010-6 [PMID: 16135758]
  55. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Mar;16(2):289-300 [PMID: 15068598]
  56. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Mar;30(3):859-73 [PMID: 18330870]
  57. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Jul 1;13(5):698-710 [PMID: 11506665]
  58. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994 Mar;123(1):34-80 [PMID: 8138779]
  59. Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):342-5 [PMID: 8455719]
  60. Exp Brain Res. 2003 May;150(2):259-63 [PMID: 12682809]
  61. Cortex. 2004 Feb;40(1):159-61 [PMID: 15174449]
  62. Psychol Rev. 2006 Apr;113(2):201-33 [PMID: 16637760]
  63. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Oct;22(5):1188-200 [PMID: 8865619]
  64. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Mar;22(3):701-9 [PMID: 21685399]
  65. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Feb;34(1):224-36 [PMID: 18248150]
  66. Brain Res. 1993 Mar 12;605(2):312-6 [PMID: 8481781]
  67. Ann Neurol. 2005 Jan;57(1):8-16 [PMID: 15597383]
  68. Cereb Cortex. 2006 Oct;16(10):1418-30 [PMID: 16306320]
  69. Neuroreport. 1998 Jul 13;9(10):2195-200 [PMID: 9694199]
  70. Psychophysiology. 2011 Jul;48(7):993-1003 [PMID: 21261631]
  71. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;15(2):231-8 [PMID: 15831408]
  72. Psychol Rev. 2007 Apr;114(2):273-315 [PMID: 17500628]
  73. Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;111(3):662-720 [PMID: 15250780]
  74. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 May;11(3):235-60 [PMID: 10402254]
  75. J Commun Disord. 2001 Nov-Dec;34(6):479-92 [PMID: 11725860]
  76. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(3):293-303 [PMID: 12457755]
  77. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan;108(1):1-16 [PMID: 9474057]
  78. Psychol Rev. 1996 Jan;103(1):56-115 [PMID: 8650300]
  79. Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 1;55(3):1346-56 [PMID: 21216293]
  80. Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1033-41; discussion 1050-8 [PMID: 17870621]
  81. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Apr;22(4):739-50 [PMID: 19302001]
  82. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Mar;1191:62-88 [PMID: 20392276]
  83. Neuroreport. 1999 Aug 20;10(12):2631-4 [PMID: 10574382]
  84. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 May;8(5):393-402 [PMID: 17431404]
  85. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Nov;10(6):766-77 [PMID: 9831743]
  86. J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 23;30(25):8435-44 [PMID: 20573891]
  87. Cortex. 2009 Oct;45(9):1025-34 [PMID: 19027896]
  88. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Nov;7(11):489-93 [PMID: 14585445]
  89. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jul 15;52(2):101-10 [PMID: 12114001]
  90. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Sep;21(1):94-105 [PMID: 15325417]
  91. Brain Lang. 1996 Feb;52(2):342-64 [PMID: 8811966]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0phonologicalvisualwordprocessingSMGTMSaspectssemantictimeeffecttaskstimulusdistributedsupramarginalgyruscontributespreferentiallyrecognitionusedchronometricreadingwordstasksinformationonsetconsistentsustainedReadingdifficultminimumrequiresrecognizinglinkingcorrespondingsoundmeaningNeurologicallyinvolvesanatomicallysetbrainregionscooperatingsolveproblemhypothesizedthusplaysimportantroletranscranialmagneticstimulationinvestigatefunctionalspecificitytiminginvolvementvisuallypresentedParticipantsperformeddesignedfocuseitherwrittendoublepulsesdelivered40 msaparttemporarilyinterfereneuralleftfivedifferentwindowsStimulation80/120120/160160/200 mspost-stimulussignificantlyslowedsubjects'reactiontimesinhibitoryspecificconditionclaimsfactbeganwithin80-120 mscontinuedapproximately100 msindicatesinitiatesearlyfindingsaccountspositparallelactivationorthographicinteractsettlestablerepresentationEarlycontributionsinferiorparietallobephonologysemantics

Similar Articles

Cited By (49)