The use of Diagnostic Imaging for Identifying Abnormal Gas Accumulations in Cetaceans and Pinnipeds.

Sophie Dennison, Andreas Fahlman, Michael Moore
Author Information
  1. Sophie Dennison: Marine Mammal Radiology San Francisco, CA, USA.

Abstract

Recent dogma suggested that marine mammals are not at risk of decompression sickness due to a number of evolutionary adaptations. Several proposed adaptations exist. Lung compression and alveolar collapse that terminate gas-exchange before a depth is reached where supersaturation is significant and bradycardia with peripheral vasoconstriction affecting the distribution, and dynamics of blood and tissue nitrogen levels. Published accounts of gas and fat emboli and dysbaric osteonecrosis in marine mammals and theoretical modeling have challenged this view-point, suggesting that decompression-like symptoms may occur under certain circumstances, contrary to common belief. Diagnostic imaging modalities are invaluable tools for the non-invasive examination of animals for evidence of gas and have been used to demonstrate the presence of incidental decompression-related renal gas accumulations in some stranded cetaceans. Diagnostic imaging has also contributed to the recognition of clinically significant gas accumulations in live and dead cetaceans and pinnipeds. Understanding the appropriate application and limitations of the available imaging modalities is important for accurate interpretation of results. The presence of gas may be asymptomatic and must be interpreted cautiously alongside all other available data including clinical examination, clinical laboratory testing, gas analysis, necropsy examination, and histology results.

Keywords

References

  1. Nature. 2003 Oct 9;425(6958):575-6 [PMID: 14534575]
  2. J Exp Biol. 2011 Nov 15;214(Pt 22):3822-8 [PMID: 22031747]
  3. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1983 Feb 15;182(4):396-402 [PMID: 6833075]
  4. Radiographics. 2006 Jan-Feb;26(1):275-97 [PMID: 16418258]
  5. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jun;43(6):990-5 [PMID: 21085032]
  6. Radiographics. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):1179-89 [PMID: 19605664]
  7. Vet Pathol. 2009 May;46(3):536-47 [PMID: 19176498]
  8. J Exp Biol. 2010 Jan 1;213(1):52-62 [PMID: 20008362]
  9. Am J Physiol. 1968 Dec;215(6):1498-505 [PMID: 4881232]
  10. J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Apr;27(4):611-32; quiz 633-6 [PMID: 18359911]
  11. J Theor Biol. 2001 Nov 21;213(2):183-95 [PMID: 11894990]
  12. Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2918-32 [PMID: 16236969]
  13. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2001 Fall;28(3):131-6 [PMID: 12067148]
  14. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Apr;174(4):901-13 [PMID: 10749221]
  15. Undersea Hyperb Med. 1997 Winter;24(4):329-35 [PMID: 9444065]
  16. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 22;279(1731):1041-50 [PMID: 22189402]
  17. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Feb;110(2):340-51 [PMID: 20966192]
  18. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984 Sep;57(3):815-25 [PMID: 6490468]
  19. Emerg Radiol. 2006 May;12(4):164-70 [PMID: 16547739]
  20. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2008 May-Jun;49(3):227-32 [PMID: 18546776]
  21. Clin Imaging. 1994 Oct-Dec;18(4):258-61 [PMID: 7528091]
  22. Science. 1979 Dec 7;206(4423):1182-3 [PMID: 505001]
  23. Science. 1985 Aug 9;229(4713):556-8 [PMID: 4023700]
  24. Radiographics. 2000 Sep-Oct;20(5):1213-24; discussion 1224-6 [PMID: 10992012]
  25. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Apr 7;279(1732):1396-404 [PMID: 21993505]
  26. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Sep;75(9):749-59 [PMID: 15460625]
  27. Vet Pathol. 2005 Jul;42(4):446-57 [PMID: 16006604]
  28. Vet Pathol. 2005 May;42(3):291-305 [PMID: 15872375]
  29. Science. 2004 Dec 24;306(5705):2215 [PMID: 15618509]
  30. Am J Anat. 1966 Jan;118(1):103-34 [PMID: 5915029]
  31. Dis Aquat Organ. 2011 Sep 9;96(2):89-96 [PMID: 22013748]
  32. Nature. 1968 Mar 9;217(5132):965-7 [PMID: 5642853]
  33. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009 Jan 1;165(1):28-39 [PMID: 18973832]
  34. Annu Rev Physiol. 1998;60:19-32 [PMID: 9558452]
  35. Neuroradiology. 2005 Jun;47(6):411-6 [PMID: 15906021]
  36. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Apr;72(4):1541-8 [PMID: 1592748]
  37. Physiol Rev. 1997 Jul;77(3):837-99 [PMID: 9234967]
  38. Heart. 2003 Mar;89(3):342-8 [PMID: 12591856]
  39. J Exp Biol. 2011 Jul 15;214(Pt 14):2390-7 [PMID: 21697431]
  40. J Physiol. 2005 Aug 1;566(Pt 3):901-6 [PMID: 15961424]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0gasimagingDiagnosticexaminationmarinemammalsdecompressionsicknessadaptationssignificantmaymodalitiespresenceaccumulationscetaceansavailableresultsclinicalRecentdogmasuggestedriskduenumberevolutionarySeveralproposedexistLungcompressionalveolarcollapseterminategas-exchangedepthreachedsupersaturationbradycardiaperipheralvasoconstrictionaffectingdistributiondynamicsbloodtissuenitrogenlevelsPublishedaccountsfatembolidysbaricosteonecrosistheoreticalmodelingchallengedview-pointsuggestingdecompression-likesymptomsoccurcertaincircumstancescontrarycommonbeliefinvaluabletoolsnon-invasiveanimalsevidenceuseddemonstrateincidentaldecompression-relatedrenalstrandedalsocontributedrecognitionclinicallylivedeadpinnipedsUnderstandingappropriateapplicationlimitationsimportantaccurateinterpretationasymptomaticmustinterpretedcautiouslyalongsidedataincludinglaboratorytestinganalysisnecropsyhistologyuseImagingIdentifyingAbnormalGasAccumulationsCetaceansPinnipedsbendscetaceancomputedtomographybubblesmagneticresonancepinnipedultrasound

Similar Articles

Cited By