Impacts of climate, land use, and biological invasion on the ecology of immature Aedes mosquitoes: implications for La Crosse emergence.

Paul T Leisnham, Steven A Juliano
Author Information
  1. Paul T Leisnham: Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA. leisnham@umd.edu

Abstract

Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) cause many diseases worldwide and their transmission is likely to change with land use and climate changes. La Crosse virus (LACV) is historically transmitted by the native mosquito Aedes triseriatus (Say) in the upper Midwestern US, but the invasive congeners Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and A. japonicus (Theobald), which co-occur with A. triseriatus in water-holding containers, may be important accessory vectors in the Appalachian region where La Crosse encephalitis is an emerging disease. This review focuses on evidence for how climate, land use, and biological invasions may have direct abiotic and indirect community-level impacts on immature developmental stages (eggs and larvae) of Aedes mosquitoes. Because vector-borne diseases usually vary in space and time and are related to the ecology of the vector species, we propose that the ecology of its mosquito vectors, particularly at their immature stages, has played an important role in the emergence of La Crosse encephalitis in the Appalachian region and represents a model for investigating the effects of environmental changes on other vector-borne diseases. We summarize the health effects of LACV and associated socioeconomic costs that make it the most important native mosquito-borne disease in the US. We review of the transmission of LACV, and present evidence for the impacts of climate, land use, and biological invasions on Aedes mosquito communities. Finally, we discuss important questions about the ecology of LACV mosquito vectors that may improve our understanding of the impacts of environmental changes on LACV and other arboviruses.

References

  1. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005 Sep;21(3):274-8 [PMID: 16252517]
  2. J Med Entomol. 1995 Sep;32(5):599-604 [PMID: 7473614]
  3. Science. 2000 Jan 21;287(5452):443-9 [PMID: 10642539]
  4. J Med Entomol. 2008 Jul;45(4):581-93 [PMID: 18714856]
  5. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55:461-83 [PMID: 19737082]
  6. Nature. 2008 Feb 21;451(7181):990-3 [PMID: 18288193]
  7. Pediatr Neurol. 2001 Nov;25(5):413-5 [PMID: 11744319]
  8. Oecologia. 1999 Jul;120(1):59-68 [PMID: 28308054]
  9. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1992 Sep;8(3):237-40 [PMID: 1402859]
  10. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2008 Nov 1;101(6):1150-1153 [PMID: 19319210]
  11. J Med Entomol. 2001 Sep;38(5):711-9 [PMID: 11580044]
  12. Freshw Biol. 2006 Mar;51(3):448-459 [PMID: 17476312]
  13. Ecology. 2009 Sep;90(9):2405-13 [PMID: 19769119]
  14. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1970 May;63(3):777-86 [PMID: 4392496]
  15. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1982 May;31(3 Pt 1):556-60 [PMID: 7081548]
  16. Science. 1991 Jul 12;253(5016):189-91 [PMID: 1853204]
  17. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Nov;69(5):509-18 [PMID: 14695088]
  18. J Child Neurol. 1999 Jan;14(1):1-14 [PMID: 10025535]
  19. Biol Invasions. 2002 Sep 1;4(3):283-297 [PMID: 19777120]
  20. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2003 Dec;19(4):382-91 [PMID: 14710741]
  21. J Med Entomol. 1999 May;36(3):394-9 [PMID: 10337114]
  22. Annu Rev Entomol. 1992;37:349-76 [PMID: 1347208]
  23. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1991 Mar;5(1):73-102 [PMID: 1646839]
  24. J Med Entomol. 2000 May;37(3):454-60 [PMID: 15535592]
  25. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Mar;76(3):450-60 [PMID: 17360867]
  26. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007 Sep;23(3):243-51 [PMID: 17939502]
  27. Ecol Entomol. 2007 Jun;32(3):262-272 [PMID: 18185841]
  28. J Med Entomol. 2009 Jan;46(1):9-14 [PMID: 19198512]
  29. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005 Jun;21(2):144-6 [PMID: 16035153]
  30. Antiviral Res. 2010 Feb;85(2):328-45 [PMID: 19857523]
  31. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1977 Sep;26(5 Pt 1):990-6 [PMID: 907059]
  32. J Med Entomol. 2006 Jul;43(4):757-61 [PMID: 16892636]
  33. J Vector Ecol. 2007 Dec;32(2):207-17 [PMID: 18260510]
  34. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007 Sep;23(3):259-63 [PMID: 17939504]
  35. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1989 Sep;5(3):422-7 [PMID: 2584976]
  36. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 May;16(5):856-8 [PMID: 20409384]
  37. Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Jan;28(1):93-7 [PMID: 10028077]
  38. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1974 Jul;23(4):694-700 [PMID: 4847044]
  39. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007;23(2 Suppl):36-49 [PMID: 17853596]
  40. J Med Entomol. 2011 May;48(3):526-32 [PMID: 21661312]
  41. J Med Entomol. 1989 Mar;26(2):122-9 [PMID: 2709388]
  42. Science. 1973 Dec 14;182(4117):1140-1 [PMID: 4750609]
  43. Nat Med. 2004 Dec;10(12 Suppl):S70-6 [PMID: 15577934]
  44. J Med Entomol. 2010 Jan;47(1):43-52 [PMID: 20180307]
  45. J Anim Ecol. 2007 Nov;76(6):1105-15 [PMID: 17922707]
  46. J Med Entomol. 2001 Nov;38(6):774-9 [PMID: 11761373]
  47. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2005 Sep 1;98(5):673-681 [PMID: 22661766]
  48. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Mar;25(1):25-31 [PMID: 19432065]
  49. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2000 Sep;16(3):175-88 [PMID: 11081644]
  50. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007;23(2 Suppl):30-4 [PMID: 17853595]
  51. J Vector Ecol. 2007 Dec;32(2):252-62 [PMID: 18260515]
  52. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1975 Sep;24(5):876-80 [PMID: 1190373]
  53. J Med Entomol. 2008 Mar;45(2):210-21 [PMID: 18402136]
  54. J Med Entomol. 1996 Jul;33(4):598-607 [PMID: 8699454]
  55. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1990 Jun;6(2):235-43 [PMID: 2370530]
  56. J Med Entomol. 2000 Jul;37(4):559-70 [PMID: 10916297]
  57. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:729-60 [PMID: 11112185]
  58. J Med Entomol. 1991 May;28(3):378-86 [PMID: 1875364]
  59. PLoS One. 2009 Jul 03;4(7):e6145 [PMID: 19582158]
  60. J Med Entomol. 2007 Nov;44(6):945-52 [PMID: 18047192]
  61. Annu Rev Entomol. 2009;54:37-56 [PMID: 19067629]
  62. J Med Entomol. 2000 Jan;37(1):40-52 [PMID: 15218906]
  63. J Med Entomol. 1972 Apr 28;9(2):125-7 [PMID: 5036195]
  64. J Med Entomol. 1995 Nov;32(6):847-52 [PMID: 8551508]
  65. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2004 Winter;4(4):360-78 [PMID: 15682518]
  66. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2008 Dec;24(4):583-4 [PMID: 19181068]
  67. Oecologia. 2010 Mar;162(3):709-18 [PMID: 19841945]
  68. Ecol Entomol. 2009 Aug;34(4):447-456 [PMID: 20161198]
  69. Oecologia. 1983 Mar;57(1-2):239-256 [PMID: 28310181]
  70. Fla Entomol. 2005 Jan 1;88(4):372-382 [PMID: 22661767]
  71. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2004 Jan;97(1):194-201 [PMID: 17710216]
  72. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005 Dec;21(4):380-6 [PMID: 16506562]
  73. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1995 Mar;11(1):35-8 [PMID: 7616187]
  74. Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(3):631-9 [PMID: 18075759]
  75. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Sep-Oct;7(5):807-11 [PMID: 11747692]
  76. Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):558-74 [PMID: 17637849]
  77. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jan;7(1):89-116 [PMID: 8118792]
  78. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1979 Nov;28(6):1040-4 [PMID: 507281]
  79. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998 Feb;58(2):168-75 [PMID: 9502600]
  80. J Med Entomol. 2003 Jul;40(4):403-10 [PMID: 14680103]
  81. J Med Entomol. 1983 Nov 30;20(6):601-7 [PMID: 6644756]
  82. J Med Entomol. 2000 Nov;37(6):950-6 [PMID: 11126556]
  83. J Med Entomol. 1994 Jan;31(1):159-67 [PMID: 8158619]
  84. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007;23(2 Suppl):3-29 [PMID: 17853594]
  85. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998 May;58(5):587-8 [PMID: 9598445]
  86. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2011 Nov;104(6):1309-1318 [PMID: 22707762]
  87. Am J Epidemiol. 1965 Mar;81:230-44 [PMID: 14261029]
  88. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1987 Jun;3(2):314-7 [PMID: 3504917]
  89. J Med Entomol. 2002 Jul;39(4):635-9 [PMID: 12144295]
  90. J Med Entomol. 1984 May 30;21(3):249-56 [PMID: 6747998]

Grants

  1. R01 AI044793/NIAID NIH HHS
  2. R15 AI075306/NIAID NIH HHS
  3. R01 AI-44793/NIAID NIH HHS
  4. R15 AI075306-01/NIAID NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Aedes
Animals
Appalachian Region
Climate
Communicable Diseases, Emerging
Ecology
Encephalitis, California
Environment
Humans
Insect Vectors
La Crosse virus
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0LACVAedeslanduseclimateLaCrossemosquitoimportantecologydiseaseschangesmayvectorsbiologicalimpactsimmaturearbovirusestransmissionnativetriseriatusUSAppalachianregionencephalitisdiseasereviewevidenceinvasionsstagesvector-borneemergenceeffectsenvironmentalArthropod-bornevirusescausemanyworldwidelikelychangevirushistoricallytransmittedSayupperMidwesterninvasivecongenersalbopictusSkusejaponicusTheobaldco-occurwater-holdingcontainersaccessoryemergingfocusesdirectabioticindirectcommunity-leveldevelopmentaleggslarvaemosquitoesusuallyvaryspacetimerelatedvectorspeciesproposeparticularlyplayedrolerepresentsmodelinvestigatingsummarizehealthassociatedsocioeconomiccostsmakemosquito-bornepresentcommunitiesFinallydiscussquestionsimproveunderstandingImpactsinvasionmosquitoes:implications

Similar Articles

Cited By