Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns.

Andrew A Strasser, Kathy Z Tang, Daniel Romer, Christopher Jepson, Joseph N Cappella
Author Information
  1. Andrew A Strasser: Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-3309, USA. strasse3@mail.med.upenn.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Family Smoking Prevention and Control Act gave the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) legal authority to mandate graphic warning labels on cigarette advertising and packaging. The FDA requires that these graphic warning labels be embedded into cigarette advertising and packaging by September 2012.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine differences in recall and viewing patterns of text-only versus graphic cigarette warning labels and the association between viewing patterns and recall.
METHODS: Participants (current daily smokers; N=200) were randomized to view a cigarette advertisement with either text-only or graphic warning labels. Viewing patterns were measured using eye-tracking, and recall was later assessed. Sessions were conducted between November 2008 and November 2009. Data analysis was conducted between March 2011 and July 2011.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in percentage correct recall of the warning label between those in the text-only versus graphic warning label condition, 50% vs 83% (χ(2)=23.74, p=0.0001). Time to first viewing of the graphic warning label text and dwell time duration (i.e., time spent looking) on the graphic image were significantly associated with correct recall. Warning labels that drew attention more quickly and resulted in longer dwell times were associated with better recall.
CONCLUSIONS: Graphic warning labels improve smokers' recall of warning and health risks; these labels do so by drawing and holding attention.

References

  1. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Apr;9(4):473-81 [PMID: 17454702]
  2. Tob Control. 2008 Sep;17 Suppl 1:i32-8 [PMID: 18768457]
  3. Addict Behav. 1994 Jan-Feb;19(1):33-9 [PMID: 8197891]
  4. JAMA. 1989 Jan 6;261(1):84-9 [PMID: 2909000]
  5. Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3:iii19-25 [PMID: 16754942]
  6. Tob Control. 2011 Sep;20(5):327-37 [PMID: 21606180]
  7. Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12(4):391-5 [PMID: 14660774]
  8. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119-27 [PMID: 1932883]
  9. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;20(1):80-4 [PMID: 16536669]
  10. Tob Control. 2009 Oct;18(5):358-64 [PMID: 19561362]
  11. Addiction. 2011 Aug;106(8):1505-10 [PMID: 21401767]
  12. Tob Control. 2001 Mar;10(1):9-15 [PMID: 11226354]
  13. Tob Control. 1997 Winter;6(4):317-25 [PMID: 9583630]
  14. Eur J Public Health. 2009 Dec;19(6):631-7 [PMID: 19726589]
  15. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 Apr;13(4):282-90 [PMID: 21330273]
  16. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Mar;11(3):293-302 [PMID: 19246628]
  17. Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422 [PMID: 9849112]
  18. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Nov;34(4):455-70 [PMID: 12564550]

Grants

  1. R01-120594/PHS HHS
  2. P20 CA095856/NCI NIH HHS
  3. P20-CA095856-06/NCI NIH HHS
  4. P50-CA095856-05/NCI NIH HHS
  5. P50-CA143187/NCI NIH HHS
  6. P50 CA143187/NCI NIH HHS
  7. P50 CA095856/NCI NIH HHS
  8. R01 CA120594/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Advertising
Aged
Attention
Eye Movement Measurements
Female
Humans
Male
Mental Recall
Middle Aged
Photography
Product Labeling
Product Packaging
Smoking
Smoking Prevention
United States
Young Adult