Comprehensive genomic studies: emerging regulatory, strategic, and quality assurance challenges for biorepositories.

Sandra A McDonald, Elaine R Mardis, David Ota, Mark A Watson, John D Pfeifer, Jonathan M Green
Author Information
  1. Sandra A McDonald: Laboratory for Translational Pathology, Dept of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 Euclid Ave, Box 8118, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Abstract

As part of the molecular revolution sweeping medicine, comprehensive genomic studies are adding powerful dimensions to medical research. However, their power exposes new regulatory, strategic, and quality assurance challenges for biorepositories. A key issue is that unlike other research techniques commonly applied to banked specimens, nucleic acid sequencing, if sufficiently extensive, yields data that could identify a patient. This evolving paradigm renders the concepts of anonymized and anonymous specimens increasingly outdated. The challenges for biorepositories in this new era include refined consent processes and wording, selection and use of legacy specimens, quality assurance procedures, institutional documentation, data sharing, and interaction with institutional review boards. Given current trends, biorepositories should consider these issues now, even if they are not currently experiencing sample requests for genomic analysis. We summarize our current experiences and best practices at Washington University Medical School, St Louis, MO, our perceptions of emerging trends, and recommendations.

References

  1. Pharmacogenomics J. 2001;1(2):101-3 [PMID: 11911435]
  2. Biotechniques. 2008 Jul;45(1):81-94 [PMID: 18611170]
  3. Nature. 2009 Sep 10;461(7261):272-6 [PMID: 19684571]
  4. Genome Med. 2009 Apr 17;1(4):40 [PMID: 19435481]
  5. Nature. 2010 Apr 15;464(7291):999-1005 [PMID: 20393555]
  6. Biopreserv Biobank. 2011 Sep;9(3):245-251 [PMID: 23386925]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 7;101(36):13306-11 [PMID: 15329413]
  8. Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Feb;9(2):152-6 [PMID: 18087293]
  9. Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1087-93 [PMID: 17529967]
  10. Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Oct 15;19(R2):R145-51 [PMID: 20705737]
  11. Biopreserv Biobank. 2010 Dec;8(4):197-201 [PMID: 23386923]
  12. PLoS Genet. 2008 Aug 29;4(8):e1000167 [PMID: 18769715]
  13. Nat Rev Genet. 2009 May;10(5):331-5 [PMID: 19308065]
  14. Science. 1996 Nov 8;274(5289):998-1001 [PMID: 8875945]
  15. J Mol Diagn. 2011 May;13(3):325-33 [PMID: 21497292]
  16. Nature. 2011 Feb 10;470(7333):198-203 [PMID: 21307932]
  17. Nat Rev Genet. 2008 May;9(5):406-11 [PMID: 18379574]
  18. Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Jan;11(1):31-46 [PMID: 19997069]
  19. J Mol Diagn. 2010 Sep;12(5):539-51 [PMID: 20805560]
  20. J Transl Med. 2011 Jun 10;9:91 [PMID: 21663644]
  21. Pathologe. 2010 Oct;31 Suppl 2:255-7 [PMID: 20812012]
  22. Nat Genet. 2009 May;41(5):579-84 [PMID: 19330030]
  23. Nat Genet. 2009 Mar;41(3):324-8 [PMID: 19219042]
  24. Nature. 2011 Feb 10;470(7333):204-13 [PMID: 21307933]
  25. Leukemia. 2011 Jul;25(7):1153-8 [PMID: 21415852]
  26. Nature. 2008 Nov 6;456(7218):66-72 [PMID: 18987736]
  27. J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13 [PMID: 25951677]
  28. Am J Pathol. 1999 Nov;155(5):1467-71 [PMID: 10550302]

Grants

  1. P30 CA091842/NCI NIH HHS
  2. UL1 TR000448/NCATS NIH HHS
  3. UL1RR024992/NCRR NIH HHS
  4. UL1 RR024992/NCRR NIH HHS
  5. P30 CA91842/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Biological Specimen Banks
Ethics Committees, Research
Genetic Research
Genomics
Humans
Information Dissemination
Quality Assurance, Health Care

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0biorepositoriesgenomicqualityassurancechallengesspecimensresearchnewregulatorystrategicdatainstitutionalcurrenttrendsemergingpartmolecularrevolutionsweepingmedicinecomprehensivestudiesaddingpowerfuldimensionsmedicalHoweverpowerexposeskeyissueunliketechniquescommonlyappliedbankednucleicacidsequencingsufficientlyextensiveyieldsidentifypatientevolvingparadigmrendersconceptsanonymizedanonymousincreasinglyoutdatederaincluderefinedconsentprocesseswordingselectionuselegacyproceduresdocumentationsharinginteractionreviewboardsGivenconsiderissuesnowevencurrentlyexperiencingsamplerequestsanalysissummarizeexperiencesbestpracticesWashingtonUniversityMedicalSchoolStLouisMOperceptionsrecommendationsComprehensivestudies:

Similar Articles

Cited By