Cognitive outcomes and familial stress after cochlear implantation in deaf children with and without developmental delays.

John S Oghalai, Susan E Caudle, Barbara Bentley, Homer Abaya, Jerry Lin, Dian Baker, Claudia Emery, Heather Bortfeld, Jody Winzelberg
Author Information
  1. John S Oghalai: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, CA 94305-5739, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The benefits of cochlear implantation for children with developmental delays (DD) often are unclear. We compared cognition, adaptive behavior, familial stress, and communication in children with and without DD.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Two tertiary care pediatric hospitals.
PATIENTS: Two hundred four children who underwent cochlear implantation assessed before and more than 1 year after implantation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), vineland adaptive behavior scales (VABS), Parental Stress Index, and Preschool Language Scale.
RESULTS: We developed a specific definition of DD for hearing-impaired children based upon diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, criteria for mental retardation; 60 children met the criteria for DD, and 144 children did not. Before implantation, multiple linear regression demonstrated that children with DD had lower scores in every domain of the MSEL and VABS (p < 0.05), but no differences in any domains of the parental stress index and preschool language scale (p > 0.1) compared with children without DD. After implantation, children without DD demonstrated significant improvements in intelligence as measured by the MSEL and age-appropriate improvements in adaptive behavior as evaluated by the VABS, and their familial stress levels were not increased after cochlear implantation. In contrast, children with DD underwent implantation at a later age and demonstrated less comprehensive developmental improvements after cochlear implantation and higher stress levels. However, when the age differences were taken into account using multiple linear regression analyses, the differences between the 2 cohorts were reduced.
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that our definition of DD is a reliable method of stratifying deaf children. Although children with DD have a normal developmental rate of adaptive behavior after cochlear implantation, their developmental rate of intelligence is lower, and they have higher stress levels than children without DD. However, our data suggest that if children with DD could be implanted as early as children without DD, their intelligence and stress outcomes would be improved.

References

  1. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011 Jun;23(3):346-50 [PMID: 21572386]
  2. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:332-4 [PMID: 7668694]
  3. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 May;130(5):666-71 [PMID: 15148195]
  4. Am J Otol. 1991;12 Suppl:62-6 [PMID: 2069191]
  5. Otol Neurotol. 2008 Feb;29(2):208-13 [PMID: 18309575]
  6. JAMA. 2010 Apr 21;303(15):1498-506 [PMID: 20407059]
  7. Laryngoscope. 2002 Feb;112(2):281-6 [PMID: 11889384]
  8. Laryngoscope. 2003 Apr;113(4):763-6 [PMID: 12671445]
  9. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996 Aug;6(4):520-5 [PMID: 8794099]
  10. Laryngoscope. 2007 Sep;117(9):1661-5 [PMID: 17690618]
  11. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2000 Dec 22;56(3):169-74 [PMID: 11137590]
  12. J Pediatr. 1991 Oct;119(4):606-14 [PMID: 1919894]
  13. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;70:28-36 [PMID: 21358182]
  14. J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Feb;38(1):157-67 [PMID: 7537345]
  15. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2006 Dec;27(6):459-69 [PMID: 17164618]
  16. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 Jan 27;55(1):1-9 [PMID: 16437058]
  17. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Sep;68(9):1185-8 [PMID: 15302150]
  18. Br J Audiol. 1989 May;23(2):99-116 [PMID: 2752221]
  19. Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):488-507 [PMID: 11059706]
  20. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 Nov;93(6):F462-8 [PMID: 18941031]
  21. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Feb;32(2):259-64 [PMID: 21131880]
  22. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2006 Summer;11(3):303-21 [PMID: 16687730]
  23. Am J Otol. 2000 May;21(3):329-35 [PMID: 10821544]
  24. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Sep;122(9):929-36 [PMID: 8797555]
  25. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Summer;12(3):335-49 [PMID: 17449899]
  26. JAMA. 2005 Jul 20;294(3):318-25 [PMID: 16030276]
  27. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Jun;69(6):791-8 [PMID: 15885331]
  28. Semin Perinatol. 2001 Oct;25(5):348-59 [PMID: 11707021]
  29. J Autism Dev Disord. 1997 Dec;27(6):653-76 [PMID: 9455727]
  30. Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Spring;21(2):373-92 [PMID: 19338689]
  31. N Engl J Med. 1994 Sep 22;331(12):753-9 [PMID: 7520533]

Grants

  1. R01 DC010075/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Psychological
Child
Child, Preschool
Cochlear Implantation
Cognition
Deafness
Developmental Disabilities
Family
Female
Humans
Infant
Intellectual Disability
Intelligence Tests
Language Development
Learning
Male
Neuropsychological Tests
Parents
Retrospective Studies
Speech Perception
Stress, Psychological
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0childrenDDimplantationstresscochlearwithoutdevelopmentaladaptivebehaviorfamilialMSELVABSdemonstrateddifferencesimprovementsintelligencelevelsdelayscomparedTwounderwent1definitionmentalcriteriamultiplelinearregressionlowerp0agehigherHoweverdatadeafrateoutcomesOBJECTIVE:benefitsoftenunclearcognitioncommunicationSTUDYDESIGN:RetrospectivereviewSETTING:tertiarycarepediatrichospitalsPATIENTS:hundredfourassessedyearMAINOUTCOMEMEASURES:MullenScalesEarlyLearningvinelandscalesParentalStressIndexPreschoolLanguageScaleRESULTS:developedspecifichearing-impairedbasedupondiagnosticstatisticalmanualdisordersfourtheditionretardation60met144scoreseverydomain<05domainsparentalindexpreschoollanguagescale>significantmeasuredage-appropriateevaluatedincreasedcontrastlaterlesscomprehensivetakenaccountusinganalyses2cohortsreducedCONCLUSION:indicatereliablemethodstratifyingAlthoughnormalsuggestimplantedearlyimprovedCognitive

Similar Articles

Cited By (9)