Dispersive FDTD analysis of induced electric field in human models due to electrostatic discharge.

Akimasa Hirata, Toshihiro Nagai, Teruyoshi Koyama, Junya Hattori, Kwok Hung Chan, Robert Kavet
Author Information
  1. Akimasa Hirata: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan. ahirata@nitech.ac.jp

Abstract

Contact currents flow from/into a charged human body when touching a grounded conductive object. An electrostatic discharge (ESD) or spark may occur just before contact or upon release. The current may stimulate muscles and peripheral nerves. In order to clarify the difference in the induced electric field between different sized human models, the in-situ electric fields were computed in anatomically based models of adults and a child for a contact current in a human body following ESD. A dispersive finite-difference time-domain method was used, in which biological tissue is assumed to obey a four-pole Debye model. From our computational results, the first peak of the discharge current was almost identical across adult and child models. The decay of the induced current in the child was also faster due mainly to its smaller body capacitance compared to the adult models. The induced electric fields in the forefingers were comparable across different models. However, the electric field induced in the arm of the child model was found to be greater than that in the adult models primarily because of its smaller cross-sectional area. The tendency for greater doses in the child has also been reported for power frequency sinusoidal contact current exposures as reported by other investigators.

MeSH Term

Adult
Child
Electric Conductivity
Female
Humans
Male
Models, Anatomic
Static Electricity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0modelscurrentinducedelectricchildhumanbodydischargecontactfieldadultelectrostaticESDmaydifferentfieldsmodelacrossalsoduesmallergreaterreportedContactcurrentsflowfrom/intochargedtouchinggroundedconductiveobjectsparkoccurjustuponreleasestimulatemusclesperipheralnervesorderclarifydifferencesizedin-situcomputedanatomicallybasedadultsfollowingdispersivefinite-differencetime-domainmethodusedbiologicaltissueassumedobeyfour-poleDebyecomputationalresultsfirstpeakalmostidenticaldecayfastermainlycapacitancecomparedforefingerscomparableHoweverarmfoundprimarilycross-sectionalareatendencydosespowerfrequencysinusoidalexposuresinvestigatorsDispersiveFDTDanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.