Callous-unemotional traits robustly predict future criminal offending in young men.

Rachel E Kahn, Amy L Byrd, Dustin A Pardini
Author Information
  1. Rachel E Kahn: Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans.
  2. Amy L Byrd: Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.
  3. Dustin A Pardini: Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Abstract

Callous-unemotional (CU) traits (e.g., lack of empathy, deficient guilt/remorse, and shallow affect) are a circumscribed facet of the adult psychopathic personality. Although several studies have found that adult psychopathy is a robust predictor of future criminal offending, research exploring the predictive utility of CU traits and future offending are lacking. Moreover, empirical studies examining the predictive utility of psychopathic features often neglect to account for other well-documented risk factors (e.g., prior offending, delinquent peers, marital status), and thus the incremental predictive utility of CU traits remains uncertain. To address these limitations, the current study examined the unique contribution of CU traits in the prediction of future criminal offending in a large ethnically diverse community sample of young adult males (Mean Age = 25.76, SD = .95). Official criminal record information was collected approximately 3.5 years later using multiple sources. Results indicated that after controlling for several other well-established predictors of future offending, men with elevated CU traits had a greater number of arrests and criminal charges and were more likely to be charged with a serious offense and obstruction of justice. CU traits also predicted future theft for Caucasian men, but not African American men. Overall, the results support the notion that CU traits significantly add to the prediction of future offending, even after controlling for several other risk factors.

References

  1. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Jun-Jul;31(3):241-52 [PMID: 18514315]
  2. Psychol Assess. 2001 Dec;13(4):531-42 [PMID: 11793896]
  3. J Abnorm Psychol. 2006 Feb;115(1):85-95 [PMID: 16492099]
  4. Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):433-45 [PMID: 20528069]
  5. J Pers Assess. 2003 Apr;80(2):154-63 [PMID: 12700018]
  6. Law Hum Behav. 2009 Feb;33(1):25-45 [PMID: 18629620]
  7. Assessment. 2007 Dec;14(4):361-74 [PMID: 17986654]
  8. Assessment. 2006 Dec;13(4):454-69 [PMID: 17050915]
  9. Crim Justice Behav. 2008 Feb 1;35(2):228-243 [PMID: 20593007]
  10. Law Hum Behav. 2007 Feb;31(1):53-75 [PMID: 17019617]
  11. Behav Sci Law. 2008;26(5):529-41 [PMID: 18788076]
  12. J Abnorm Psychol. 1990 Aug;99(3):250-9 [PMID: 2212275]
  13. Behav Sci Law. 2010 Mar-Apr;28(2):235-66 [PMID: 20422648]
  14. J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):205-19 [PMID: 17437385]
  15. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Aug;73(4):737-41 [PMID: 16173862]
  16. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;49(4):359-75 [PMID: 18221345]
  17. Personal Disord. 2011 Jul;2(3):193-208 [PMID: 22448766]
  18. Law Hum Behav. 1998 Feb;22(1):109-28 [PMID: 9487793]
  19. Assessment. 2010 Mar;17(1):44-57 [PMID: 19797326]
  20. Psychol Assess. 2000 Jun;12(2):132-9 [PMID: 10887759]
  21. Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):455-9 [PMID: 20528071]
  22. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 May;117(2):396-405 [PMID: 18489215]
  23. J Pers Disord. 2001 Oct;15(5):425-41 [PMID: 11723877]
  24. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2011 Feb;55(1):5-26 [PMID: 20130091]
  25. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Oct;35(5):773-85 [PMID: 17510788]
  26. Law Hum Behav. 2008 Oct;32(5):423-38 [PMID: 18064548]
  27. Law Hum Behav. 2004 Oct;28(5):505-27 [PMID: 15638207]
  28. J Pers Assess. 2009 Nov;91(6):584-92 [PMID: 19838908]
  29. Law Hum Behav. 2003 Oct;27(5):541-58 [PMID: 14593797]
  30. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;73(3):466-76 [PMID: 15982144]
  31. Can J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;54(12):803-12 [PMID: 20047719]
  32. J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Aug;120(3):758-64 [PMID: 21381803]
  33. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001 Jan;189(1):49-55 [PMID: 11206665]
  34. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Jul;37(5):591-609 [PMID: 19221871]
  35. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;49(11):1134-44 [PMID: 20970701]
  36. Behav Sci Law. 1999;17(4):435-43 [PMID: 10653992]
  37. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 Feb;22(1):79-112 [PMID: 11793579]
  38. Prev Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;25(5):554-60 [PMID: 8888323]
  39. Law Hum Behav. 2008 Feb;32(1):28-45 [PMID: 17629778]
  40. Law Hum Behav. 2007 Apr;31(2):209-29 [PMID: 17123157]
  41. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Apr;56(2):227-32 [PMID: 3372830]
  42. Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(6):695-712 [PMID: 14696027]

Grants

  1. DA411018/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. K01 MH078039/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. 1K01MH078039/NIMH NIH HHS
  4. R01 MH073841/NIMH NIH HHS
  5. MH 48890/NIMH NIH HHS
  6. MH 50778/NIMH NIH HHS
  7. R01 MH050778/NIMH NIH HHS
  8. R01 MH042529/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Crime
Empathy
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Personality Inventory
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0traitsCUfutureoffendingcriminalmenadultseveralpredictiveutilityCallous-unemotionalegpsychopathicstudiesriskfactorspredictionyoung=controllinglackempathydeficientguilt/remorseshallowaffectcircumscribedfacetpersonalityAlthoughfoundpsychopathyrobustpredictorresearchexploringlackingMoreoverempiricalexaminingfeaturesoftenneglectaccountwell-documentedpriordelinquentpeersmaritalstatusthusincrementalremainsuncertainaddresslimitationscurrentstudyexamineduniquecontributionlargeethnicallydiversecommunitysamplemalesMeanAge2576SD95Officialrecordinformationcollectedapproximately35yearslaterusingmultiplesourcesResultsindicatedwell-establishedpredictorselevatedgreaternumberarrestschargeslikelychargedseriousoffenseobstructionjusticealsopredictedtheftCaucasianAfricanAmericanOverallresultssupportnotionsignificantlyaddevenrobustlypredict

Similar Articles

Cited By