Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy--a comparative study.

Eric C H Lai, George P C Yang, Chung Ngai Tang
Author Information
  1. Eric C H Lai: Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, 3 Lok Man Road, Chai Wan, Hong Kong SAR, China. ericlai@alumni.cuhk.edu.hk

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, pancreatic surgery is considered as one of the most complex surgeries. The recently developed robotic technology allows surgeons to perform pancreaticoduodenectomy. A comparative study was undertaken to study outcomes between robotic approach and open approach.
METHODS: A consecutive patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (robotic approach, n=20; open approach=67) between January 2000 and February 2012 at a single institution were analyzed.
RESULTS: The robotic group had a significantly longer operative time (mean, 491.5 vs. 264.9 min), reduced blood loss (mean, 247 vs. 774.8 ml), and shorter hospital stay (mean, 13.7 vs. 25.8 days) compared to the open group. Open conversion rate was 5%. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall complication rates, mortality rates, R0 resection rate and harvested lymph node numbers.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy was safe and feasible in appropriately selected patients. However, it is too early to draw definitive conclusions about the value of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. In light of remaining uncertainties regarding short-term and long-term outcome, caution should be exercised in the assessment of the appropriateness of this operation for individual patient.

MeSH Term

Aged
Chi-Square Distribution
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreatic Cyst
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Robotics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pancreaticoduodenectomyroboticstudyopenapproachmeanvslaparoscopiccomparativepatientsgroup8rateratesrobot-assistedBACKGROUND:TraditionallypancreaticsurgeryconsideredonecomplexsurgeriesrecentlydevelopedtechnologyallowssurgeonsperformundertakenoutcomesMETHODS:consecutiveunderwentn=20approach=67January2000February2012singleinstitutionanalyzedRESULTS:significantlylongeroperativetime49152649minreducedbloodloss247774mlshorterhospitalstay13725dayscomparedOpenconversion5%significantdifferencetwogroupstermsoverallcomplicationmortalityR0resectionharvestedlymphnodenumbersCONCLUSIONS:showedsafefeasibleappropriatelyselectedHoweverearlydrawdefinitiveconclusionsvaluelightremaininguncertaintiesregardingshort-termlong-termoutcomecautionexercisedassessmentappropriatenessoperationindividualpatientRobot-assistedversuspancreaticoduodenectomy--a

Similar Articles

Cited By