Old proverbs in new skins - an FMRI study on defamiliarization.

Isabel C Bohrn, Ulrike Altmann, Oliver Lubrich, Winfried Menninghaus, Arthur M Jacobs
Author Information
  1. Isabel C Bohrn: Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

We investigated how processing fluency and defamiliarization (the art of rendering familiar notions unfamiliar) contribute to the affective and esthetic processing of reading in an event-related functional magnetic-resonance-imaging experiment. We compared the neural correlates of processing (a) familiar German proverbs, (b) unfamiliar proverbs, (c) defamiliarized variations with altered content relative to the original proverb (proverb-variants), (d) defamiliarized versions with unexpected wording but the same content as the original proverb (proverb-substitutions), and (e) non-rhetorical sentences. Here, we demonstrate that defamiliarization is an effective way of guiding attention, but that the degree of affective involvement depends on the type of defamiliarization: enhanced activation in affect-related regions (orbito-frontal cortex, medPFC) was found only if defamiliarization altered the content of the original proverb. Defamiliarization on the level of wording was associated with attention processes and error monitoring. Although proverb-variants evoked activation in affect-related regions, familiar proverbs received the highest beauty ratings.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15 [PMID: 11994752]
  2. Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):983-91 [PMID: 11906238]
  3. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 May;27(5):392-401 [PMID: 16596654]
  4. Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3212-21 [PMID: 22155328]
  5. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 [PMID: 5146491]
  6. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1290-301 [PMID: 15521805]
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):989-1000 [PMID: 11761320]
  8. Methods. 2007 May;42(1):68-76 [PMID: 17434417]
  9. Cereb Cortex. 2000 Jul;10(7):698-705 [PMID: 10906316]
  10. Neuroreport. 2003 Jul 1;14(9):1215-9 [PMID: 12824762]
  11. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jan;20(1):170-81 [PMID: 17919080]
  12. Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;19(7):709-16 [PMID: 18727787]
  13. Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):1125-32 [PMID: 19010423]
  14. Science. 1980 Feb 1;207(4430):557-8 [PMID: 7352271]
  15. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2767-96 [PMID: 19329570]
  16. Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 15;50(3):1313-9 [PMID: 20056157]
  17. Neuroreport. 2002 Jan 21;13(1):15-9 [PMID: 11924878]
  18. Psychol Bull. 1995 Jul;118(1):133-54 [PMID: 7644603]
  19. Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):276-85 [PMID: 16087351]
  20. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 2;45(4):860-70 [PMID: 17010392]
  21. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82 [PMID: 15582859]
  22. Mem Cognit. 2009 Jun;37(4):529-40 [PMID: 19460959]
  23. Brain Lang. 2007 Feb;100(2):127-41 [PMID: 17292739]
  24. Prog Neurobiol. 2004 Apr;72(5):341-72 [PMID: 15157726]
  25. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Dec;21(12):2358-68 [PMID: 19016600]
  26. Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):1022-32 [PMID: 16084739]
  27. Brain Cogn. 2009 Jun;70(1):84-91 [PMID: 19223099]
  28. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):1923-9 [PMID: 20230844]
  29. Brain Res. 2007 Jun 25;1155:147-62 [PMID: 17499223]
  30. Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5 [PMID: 7350657]
  31. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jan;23(1):53-62 [PMID: 20175677]
  32. Brain Lang. 2009 Nov;111(2):114-24 [PMID: 19781756]
  33. PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e5047 [PMID: 19333386]
  34. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59 [PMID: 7962581]
  35. Cortex. 2006 Aug;42(6):823-30 [PMID: 17131586]
  36. Methods. 2007 May;42(1):100-8 [PMID: 17434420]
  37. Cereb Cortex. 2008 Jan;18(1):162-70 [PMID: 17490991]
  38. J Child Lang. 2002 Feb;29(1):127-50 [PMID: 11968879]
  39. Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):799-806 [PMID: 16984298]
  40. Brain Lang. 2010 May;113(2):51-8 [PMID: 20304477]
  41. Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):648-52 [PMID: 14629701]
  42. Psychol Sci. 2000 Sep;11(5):424-8 [PMID: 11228916]
  43. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Mar;4(1):35-49 [PMID: 19015080]
  44. Neuron. 1999 Oct;24(2):427-32 [PMID: 10571235]
  45. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38 [PMID: 18400922]
  46. Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):489-508 [PMID: 15527534]
  47. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):862-77 [PMID: 16248738]
  48. Neuroimage. 1998 Jan;7(1):30-40 [PMID: 9500830]
  49. Brain Res. 2006 Apr 21;1084(1):89-103 [PMID: 16545344]
  50. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(8):1182-205 [PMID: 17079014]
  51. Brain Lang. 2012 Sep;122(3):211-26 [PMID: 22277309]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0proverbsdefamiliarizationprocessingfamiliarcontentoriginalproverbunfamiliaraffectivereadingdefamiliarizedalteredproverb-variantswordingattentionactivationaffect-relatedregionsinvestigatedfluencyartrenderingnotionscontributeestheticevent-relatedfunctionalmagnetic-resonance-imagingexperimentcomparedneuralcorrelatesGermanbcvariationsrelativedversionsunexpectedproverb-substitutionsenon-rhetoricalsentencesdemonstrateeffectivewayguidingdegreeinvolvementdependstypedefamiliarization:enhancedorbito-frontalcortexmedPFCfoundDefamiliarizationlevelassociatedprocesseserrormonitoringAlthoughevokedreceivedhighestbeautyratingsOldnewskins-FMRIstudyestheticsfMRIfamiliarityforegroundingliterature

Similar Articles

Cited By