The influence of flankers on race categorization of faces.

Hsin-Mei Sun, Benjamin Balas
Author Information
  1. Hsin-Mei Sun: Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA. mei.sun@ndsu.edu

Abstract

Context affects multiple cognitive and perceptual processes. In the present study, we asked how the context of a set of faces would affect the perception of a target face's race in two distinct tasks. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants categorized target faces according to perceived racial category (Black or White). In Experiment 1, the target face was presented alone or with Black or White flanker faces. The orientation of flanker faces was also manipulated to investigate how face inversion effect would interact with the influences of flanker faces on the target face. The results showed that participants were more likely to categorize the target face as White when it was surrounded by inverted White faces (an assimilation effect). Experiment 2 further examined how different aspects of the visual context would affect the perception of the target face by manipulating flanker faces' shape and pigmentation, as well as their orientation. The results showed that flanker faces' shape and pigmentation affected the perception of the target face differently. While shape elicited a contrast effect, pigmentation appeared to be assimilative. These novel findings suggest that the perceived race of a face is modulated by the appearance of other faces and their distinct shape and pigmentation properties. However, the contrast and assimilation effects elicited by flanker faces' shape and pigmentation may be specific to race categorization, since the same stimuli used in a delayed matching task (Experiment 3) revealed that flanker pigmentation induced a contrast effect on the perception of target pigmentation.

References

  1. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;15(3):122-31 [PMID: 21292539]
  2. Mem Cognit. 1975 Sep;3(5):519-26 [PMID: 24203874]
  3. J Soc Issues. 2009 Mar 1;65(1): [PMID: 24311822]
  4. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jun 1;6(6):255-260 [PMID: 12039607]
  5. Vision Res. 1999 Sep;39(18):3145-55 [PMID: 10664810]
  6. Brain Res. 2011 Jun 29;1398:40-54 [PMID: 21621195]
  7. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25107 [PMID: 21977227]
  8. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):383-401 [PMID: 15582860]
  9. Perception. 2007;36(9):1368-74 [PMID: 18196702]
  10. Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):392-8 [PMID: 18399893]
  11. Perception. 2010;39(8):1142-5 [PMID: 20942364]
  12. Dev Sci. 2011 Jul;14(4):892-900 [PMID: 21676108]
  13. Infancy. 2011;16(6):640-654 [PMID: 22039335]
  14. Perception. 1999;28(9):1171-5 [PMID: 10694965]
  15. Nature. 1996 Dec 5;384(6608):404 [PMID: 8945457]
  16. Brain Res. 2011 May 4;1388:123-33 [PMID: 21382358]
  17. Perception. 2006;35(6):749-59 [PMID: 16836042]
  18. Emotion. 2003 Dec;3(4):327-43 [PMID: 14674827]
  19. Vision Res. 2007 Jan;47(2):157-65 [PMID: 17174375]
  20. Vision Res. 1995 Nov;35(22):3131-44 [PMID: 8533348]
  21. Cognition. 1993 Apr;47(1):25-57 [PMID: 8482070]
  22. Vision Res. 1997 Nov;37(22):3181-92 [PMID: 9463699]
  23. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):705-12 [PMID: 21512838]
  24. Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):R751-3 [PMID: 17803921]
  25. Vision Res. 1992 May;32(5):931-41 [PMID: 1604862]
  26. Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):559-64 [PMID: 15271002]
  27. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):264-9 [PMID: 12120788]
  28. Prog Brain Res. 2006;155:37-48 [PMID: 17027378]
  29. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Dec;16(10):1730-45 [PMID: 15701225]
  30. Perception. 2009;38(1):145-8 [PMID: 19323144]
  31. Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):157-62 [PMID: 11340926]
  32. Perception. 1990;19(4):531-43 [PMID: 2096371]
  33. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Sep;62(9):1716-22 [PMID: 19382009]
  34. Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):973-7 [PMID: 19000204]
  35. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Apr;96(4):795-810 [PMID: 19309203]
  36. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):739-44 [PMID: 11426231]
  37. Vision Res. 2003 Feb;43(4):393-404 [PMID: 12535996]
  38. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):778-97 [PMID: 19815781]
  39. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;29(3):360-70 [PMID: 15273013]
  40. Cogn Psychol. 1982 Apr;14(2):143-77 [PMID: 7083801]
  41. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29 [PMID: 15263892]
  42. Perception. 2003;32(2):249-52 [PMID: 12696668]
  43. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):718-34 [PMID: 19485687]
  44. Cogn Sci. 2007 Sep 10;31(5):911-24 [PMID: 21635322]
  45. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):498-506 [PMID: 19836406]
  46. Emotion. 2006 Feb;6(1):28-39 [PMID: 16637748]
  47. Perception. 2001;30(1):73-83 [PMID: 11257979]
  48. J Exp Psychol. 1969 Aug;81(2):275-80 [PMID: 5811803]
  49. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):501-12 [PMID: 17087569]
  50. Perception. 2011;40(5):621-4 [PMID: 21882724]
  51. Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):29-33 [PMID: 21106887]

Grants

  1. P20 GM103505/NIGMS NIH HHS
  2. P20 RR020151/NCRR NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Black or African American
Black People
Color Perception
Face
Female
Humans
Male
Orientation
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Perceptual Masking
Racial Groups
White People

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0facestargetfaceflankerpigmentationshapeperceptionraceWhiteeffectExperimentfaces'contrastcontextaffectdistinct12participantsperceivedBlackorientationresultsshowedassimilationelicitedcategorizationContextaffectsmultiplecognitiveperceptualprocessespresentstudyaskedsetface'stwotasksExperimentscategorizedaccordingracialcategorypresentedalonealsomanipulatedinvestigateinversioninteractinfluenceslikelycategorizesurroundedinvertedexamineddifferentaspectsvisualmanipulatingwellaffecteddifferentlyappearedassimilativenovelfindingssuggestmodulatedappearancepropertiesHowevereffectsmayspecificsincestimuliuseddelayedmatchingtask3revealedinducedinfluenceflankers

Similar Articles

Cited By