Subcutaneous forehead island flap for nasal reconstruction.

A Ebrahimi, M H Kalantar Motamedi, N Nejadsarvari, E Shams Koushki
Author Information
  1. A Ebrahimi: Department of Plastic Surgery, Trauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of nasal skin after tumor resection is imperative for full patient rehabilitation; and use of similar skin is necessary to achieve best esthetic and functional results.
METHODS: This clinical series study represent management of patients with large nasal defects (up to 4x7 cm) using subcutaneous pedicle island paramedian forehead flap, during a period of 2007-2009, 8 patients with large nasal defects were repaired with this flap, among them 5 patients were male and 3 patients were female with mean age of 53 years, all cases were reconstructed with island pedicle flap in a single stage.
RESULTS: Good and satisfying results were achieved in all cases except for one case that was operated again for debulking of flap.
CONCLUSION: Island paramedian forehead flap provides esthetic and functional results in a single stage reconstruction of defects with various sizes and locations. This variation of forehead flap is a good choice especially for those patients that have problems with cost or problem with multistage reconstruction of nasal defects.

Keywords

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Jul;106(1):111-4 [PMID: 10883622]
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jun;121(6):1956-1963 [PMID: 18520881]
  3. Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Jul;63(1):67-70 [PMID: 19546676]
  4. Clin Plast Surg. 1981 Jul;8(3):535-63 [PMID: 7028361]
  5. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969 Jul;44(1):67-73 [PMID: 4893013]
  6. J Craniofac Surg. 2008 Nov;19(6):1549-51 [PMID: 19098548]
  7. J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Sep;18(5):1114-9 [PMID: 17912095]
  8. Facial Plast Surg. 2011 Jun;27(3):249-57 [PMID: 21567344]
  9. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 May;109(6):1839-55; discussion 1856-61 [PMID: 11994582]
  10. Facial Plast Surg. 2011 Jun;27(3):266-75 [PMID: 21567346]
  11. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 May;69(5):1478-84 [PMID: 21185640]
  12. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963 Jun;31:521-7 [PMID: 14022737]
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969 Aug;44(2):175-82 [PMID: 4895073]
  14. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Jul;98(1):155-9 [PMID: 8657769]
  15. Br J Plast Surg. 1973 Jul;26(3):202-13 [PMID: 4580012]
  16. Ann Plast Surg. 2010 May;64(5):645-8 [PMID: 20395802]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0flapnasalpatientsdefectsforeheadresultsislandreconstructionReconstructionskinestheticfunctionallargepedicleparamediancasessinglestageBACKGROUND:tumorresectionimperativefullpatientrehabilitationusesimilarnecessaryachievebestMETHODS:clinicalseriesstudyrepresentmanagement4x7cmusingsubcutaneousperiod2007-20098repairedamong5male3femalemeanage53yearsreconstructedRESULTS:GoodsatisfyingachievedexceptonecaseoperateddebulkingCONCLUSION:IslandprovidesvarioussizeslocationsvariationgoodchoiceespeciallyproblemscostproblemmultistageSubcutaneousBasalcellcarcinomaEstheticForeheadSurgicalflaps

Similar Articles

Cited By