Evaluation of a toolkit to introduce standing orders for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in adults: a multimodal pilot project.

Mary Patricia Nowalk, Jean Nutini, Mahlon Raymund, Faruque Ahmed, Steven M Albert, Richard K Zimmerman
Author Information
  1. Mary Patricia Nowalk: Department of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States. tnowalk@pitt.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunization of adults with influenza vaccine and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine remains lower than recommended levels. Standing order programs (SOPs) in which non-physician medical personnel are permitted to assess an adult patient's immunization status and administer vaccines without an individual physician order are a proven method of increasing adult vaccinations, yet they are used by less than one half of primary care physicians caring for adults.
METHODS: Following a national survey of primary care physicians about barriers to SOPs for adult immunizations, a SOP toolkit was developed. After review by a panel of experts, the toolkit was pilot tested in three primary care practices in a health care network with the same electronic medical record (EMR) system and low adult vaccination rates. Practice staffs were trained in the use of SOPs and the toolkit at a group meeting. This study was designed to pilot-test and evaluate the toolkit with the express intention of improving it. Three methods were used to evaluate the toolkit: (1) direct observation and interviews of each practice's staff; (2) surveys of each practice's staff; and (3) influenza and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) vaccination rates.
RESULTS: The staffs at all sites were equally likely to find the presentations and toolkit useful and did not differ in their knowledge of using SOPs for vaccination. They expressed a common set of barriers to implementing SOPs despite using the toolkit, and provided ideas for improving implementation. One site viewed SOPs in general in a more negative light and expressed that SOPs unfairly increased their workload. Vaccination rates in this site did not differ from those of the control site.
CONCLUSION: The evaluation suggested that the SOP toolkit should be expanded to include additional strategies to improve its applicability and effectiveness.

Grants

  1. 5U50CD300860/ODCDC CDC HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Female
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Immunization Programs
Influenza Vaccines
Influenza, Human
Male
Middle Aged
Physicians, Primary Care
Pilot Projects
Pneumococcal Infections
Pneumococcal Vaccines
Primary Health Care
Vaccination
Young Adult

Chemicals

Influenza Vaccines
Pneumococcal Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0toolkitSOPsadultcarevaccinationinfluenzavaccinepneumococcalprimaryratessiteadultspolysaccharideordermedicalusedphysiciansbarriersSOPpilotstaffsevaluateimprovingpractice'sstaffdifferusingexpressedBACKGROUND:ImmunizationremainslowerrecommendedlevelsStandingprogramsnon-physicianpersonnelpermittedassesspatient'simmunizationstatusadministervaccineswithoutindividualphysicianprovenmethodincreasingvaccinationsyetlessonehalfcaringMETHODS:FollowingnationalsurveyimmunizationsdevelopedreviewpanelexpertstestedthreepracticeshealthnetworkelectronicrecordEMRsystemlowPracticetrainedusegroupmeetingstudydesignedpilot-testexpressintentionThreemethodstoolkit:1directobservationinterviews2surveys3PPVRESULTS:sitesequallylikelyfindpresentationsusefulknowledgecommonsetimplementingdespiteprovidedideasimplementationOneviewedgeneralnegativelightunfairlyincreasedworkloadVaccinationcontrolCONCLUSION:evaluationsuggestedexpandedincludeadditionalstrategiesimproveapplicabilityeffectivenessEvaluationintroducestandingordersadults:multimodalproject

Similar Articles

Cited By