Colonoscopic versus nasogastric fecal transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a review and pooled analysis.

R Postigo, J H Kim
Author Information
  1. R Postigo: Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been demonstrated to be highly effective for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). However, the best route of administration has not been established. We present a pooled analysis of the reported cases of CDI treated with FMT via colonoscopy or nasogastric tube (NGT) to evaluate treatment efficacy.
METHODS: PubMed was searched for English-written articles published up to December 2011. Studies that reported cases of FMT for recurrent CDI using either colonoscopy or NGT-guided fecal infusion were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 182 patients from 12 published studies were identified; 148 patients received FMT via colonoscopy (colonoscopy group) and 34 patients received FMT via NGT (NGT group). The median age in the colonoscopy group as compared with the NGT group was 72 and 82 years, respectively. There were differences regarding pre-FMT treatment for CDI; 134 patients (90.5 %, 134/148) received lavage with/without antibiotic in the colonoscopy group and 34 patients (100.0 %, 34/34) received antibiotic without lavage in the NGT group, P < 0.001. A higher stool volume was used for FMT in the colonoscopy group (121 patients, 81.8 %, used 100-400 ml) than in the NGT group (33 patients, 97.0 %, used <100 ml), P < 0.001. The treatment efficacy did not differ significantly; 93.2 % (138/148) success for the colonoscopy group as compared to 85.3 % success (29/34) for the NGT group, P = 0.162. Recurrence of CDI after FMT was also similar in both the colonoscopy group (8/148 5.4 %) versus the NGT group (2/34, 5.9 %), P = 1.000.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite procedural differences, FMT via colonoscopy or NGT appears to be highly effective and safe for the management of recurrent CDI.

References

  1. Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Jul;27(7):1029-39 [PMID: 17594209]
  2. J Infect Dis. 1981 Mar;143(3):470-5 [PMID: 6785366]
  3. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 May-Jun;44(5):354-60 [PMID: 20048681]
  4. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jul;96(7):2262-4 [PMID: 11467668]
  5. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Jun;14(6):929-31 [PMID: 18507904]
  6. Infection. 2012 Oct;40(5):479-84 [PMID: 22527876]
  7. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;53(10):994-1002 [PMID: 22002980]
  8. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul;97(7):1769-75 [PMID: 12135033]
  9. Infection. 2012 Aug;40(4):469-72 [PMID: 22161290]
  10. Anaesthesia. 1999 Oct;54(10):1012-3 [PMID: 10541695]
  11. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 1;36(5):580-5 [PMID: 12594638]
  12. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jul;23(3):529-49 [PMID: 20610822]
  13. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;9(12):1044-9 [PMID: 21871249]
  14. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2009 Apr-Jun;72(2):269-70 [PMID: 19637789]
  15. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;8(2):166-73 [PMID: 19850154]
  16. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44(8):562-6 [PMID: 20463588]
  17. J Hosp Infect. 1998 Sep;40(1):1-15 [PMID: 9777516]
  18. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44(8):551-61 [PMID: 20716985]
  19. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 May-Jun;46(5):350-3 [PMID: 22495812]
  20. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep;45(8):655-7 [PMID: 21716124]
  21. QJM. 2009 Nov;102(11):781-4 [PMID: 19726581]
  22. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;42(11-12):857-61 [PMID: 20662620]
  23. Gastroenterology. 1988 Apr;94(4):928-32 [PMID: 3345894]
  24. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009 Jul;7(7):526-36 [PMID: 19528959]
  25. Gastroenterology. 2012 Mar;142(3):490-6 [PMID: 22155369]
  26. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov;45 Suppl:S159-67 [PMID: 21992957]
  27. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996 Apr;22(3):186-9 [PMID: 8724255]
  28. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44(8):567-70 [PMID: 20485184]
  29. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb;46(2):145-9 [PMID: 22157239]
  30. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 May;31(5):431-55 [PMID: 20307191]
  31. Arch Surg. 1961 Jul;83:147-60 [PMID: 13710457]
  32. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov;95(11):3283-5 [PMID: 11095355]
  33. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Apr;18(2):247-63 [PMID: 15831824]

MeSH Term

Clostridioides difficile
Colonoscopy
Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous
Feces
Humans
Intubation, Gastrointestinal
Therapeutic Irrigation
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupcolonoscopyNGTFMT%patientsCDItreatment0viareceivedPrecurrent5usedtransplantationhighlyeffectiveClostridiumdifficilepooledanalysisreportedcasesnasogastricefficacypublishedfecal34compareddifferenceslavageantibiotic<001mlsuccess=versusBACKGROUND:FecalmicrobiotademonstratedinfectionHoweverbestrouteadministrationestablishedpresenttreatedtubeevaluateMETHODS:PubMedsearchedEnglish-writtenarticlesDecember2011StudiesusingeitherNGT-guidedinfusionreviewedRESULTS:total18212studiesidentified148medianage7282yearsrespectivelyregardingpre-FMT13490134/148with/without10034/34withouthigherstoolvolume121818100-4003397<100differsignificantly932138/14885329/34162Recurrencealsosimilar8/14842/3491000CONCLUSIONS:DespiteproceduralappearssafemanagementColonoscopicinfection:review

Similar Articles

Cited By