Lacking control over the trade-off between quality and quantity in visual short-term memory.

Alexandra M Murray, Anna C Nobre, Duncan E Astle, Mark G Stokes
Author Information
  1. Alexandra M Murray: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Visual short-term memory (VSTM) is limited in the quantity and quality of items that can be retained over time. Importantly, these two mnemonic parameters interact: increasing the number of items in VSTM reduces the quality with which they are represented. Here, we ask whether this trade-off is under top-down control. Specifically, we test whether participants can strategically optimise the trade-off between quality and quantity for VSTM according to task demands. We manipulated strategic trade-off by varying expectations about the number of to-be-remembered items (Experiments 1-2) or the precision required for the memory-based judgement (Experiment 3). In a final experiment, we manipulated both variables in a complementary way to maximise the motivation to strategically control the balance between number and the quality of items encoded into VSTM. In different blocks, performance would benefit most either by encoding a large number of items with low precision or by encoding a small number of items with high precision (Experiment 4). In all experiments, we compared VSTM performance on trials matched for mnemonic demand, but within contexts emphasising the quality or quantity of VSTM representations. Across all four experiments, we found no evidence to suggest that participants use this contextual information to bias the balance between the number and precision of items in VSTM. Rather, our data suggest that the trade-off may be determined primarily by stimulus-driven factors at encoding.

References

  1. J Vis. 2009 Sep 09;9(10):7.1-11 [PMID: 19810788]
  2. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr;20(2):177-82 [PMID: 20362427]
  3. Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1434-41 [PMID: 21987693]
  4. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(7):964-74 [PMID: 10775707]
  5. Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):851-4 [PMID: 18687968]
  6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1359-67 [PMID: 19803642]
  7. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1224-34 [PMID: 19413473]
  8. Nat Neurosci. 2011 May;14(5):656-61 [PMID: 21441920]
  9. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Mar;3(3):284-91 [PMID: 10700262]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6802-7 [PMID: 19339493]
  11. Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1458-65 [PMID: 21335015]
  12. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):146-62 [PMID: 21972046]
  13. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):488-505 [PMID: 21604913]
  14. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):103-7 [PMID: 18066057]
  15. Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):423-8 [PMID: 19320861]
  16. J Vis. 2004 Dec 29;4(12):1120-35 [PMID: 15669916]
  17. Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):233-5 [PMID: 18385672]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106(46):19569-74 [PMID: 19887644]
  19. J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jan;77(1):24-42 [PMID: 9120566]
  20. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202 [PMID: 11283309]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 22;105(16):5975-9 [PMID: 18420818]
  22. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 [PMID: 5146491]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust
  2. MC_UP_A060_1103/Medical Research Council
  3. MR/J009024/1/Medical Research Council
  4. WT082791MA/Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Attention
Female
Humans
Male
Memory
Memory, Short-Term
Models, Statistical
Normal Distribution
Photic Stimulation
Reaction Time
Reproducibility of Results
Space Perception
Vision, Ocular
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0VSTMitemsqualitynumbertrade-offquantityprecisioncontrolencodingshort-termmemorycanmnemonicwhetherparticipantsstrategicallymanipulatedExperimentbalanceperformanceexperimentssuggestVisuallimitedretainedtimeImportantlytwoparametersinteract:increasingreducesrepresentedasktop-downSpecificallytestoptimiseaccordingtaskdemandsstrategicvaryingexpectationsto-be-rememberedExperiments1-2requiredmemory-basedjudgement3finalexperimentvariablescomplementarywaymaximisemotivationencodeddifferentblocksbenefiteitherlargelowsmallhigh4comparedtrialsmatcheddemandwithincontextsemphasisingrepresentationsAcrossfourfoundevidenceusecontextualinformationbiasRatherdatamaydeterminedprimarilystimulus-drivenfactorsLackingvisual

Similar Articles

Cited By