Where Does Evidence from New Trials for Schizophrenia Fit with the Existing Evidence: A Case of the Emperor's New Clothes?

Mahesh Jayaram, Ranganath D Rattehalli, Clive E Adams
Author Information
  1. Mahesh Jayaram: Leeds and York Partnerships NHS Foundation Trust, Aire Court Community Unit, Lingwell Grove, Leeds LS10 4BS, UK.

Abstract

Advent of "atypical" antipsychotics has spawned new trials in the recent years and the number of such trial reports has been increasing exponentially. As clinicians we have been led to believe that "atypicals" are better than "typicals" despite the odd dissenting voice in academic and clinical circles. This has been largely ignored until the publication of two landmark, independent, pragmatic trials, Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) and Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS), which proved that thoughtfully chosen "typical" antipsychotics were as good as the newer "atypicals." We pooled "leaving the study early data" from Cochrane Reviews that existed before CATIE and CUtLASS and added data from CATIE and CUtLASS to the pool for a "before and after" comparison. Addition of CATIE and CUtLASS data only led to narrowing of the already existing confidence intervals, merely increasing precision, and decreasing the risk of Type II error. Perhaps surprisingly, CATIE and CUtLASS when pooled with the already existing data showed us that we had chosen to turn a blind eye to findings that already existed. This leads clinicians to question as to whether, in future, we need to feel less guilty about crying out early on that the emperor has no clothes on.

References

  1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD000967 [PMID: 15106155]
  2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD001359 [PMID: 15846619]
  3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD000284 [PMID: 12804394]
  4. Lancet. 2008 Mar 29;371(9618):1085-97 [PMID: 18374841]
  5. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2004 Apr-Jun;13(2):99-112 [PMID: 15298319]
  6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD003082 [PMID: 17054159]
  7. BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1181-4 [PMID: 9794850]
  8. Schizophr Res. 2008 Mar;100(1-3):20-38 [PMID: 18243663]
  9. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD005237 [PMID: 15846745]
  10. JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637-9 [PMID: 8773637]
  11. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;63(10):1079-87 [PMID: 17015810]
  12. Control Clin Trials. 2004 Dec;25(6):598-612 [PMID: 15588746]
  13. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD004578 [PMID: 16625607]
  14. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000059 [PMID: 10796289]
  15. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1209-23 [PMID: 16172203]
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD003545 [PMID: 14974020]
  17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD003443 [PMID: 15674907]
  18. Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):31-41 [PMID: 19058842]
  19. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;163(2):185-94 [PMID: 16449469]
  20. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;166(2):152-63 [PMID: 19015230]
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001162 [PMID: 10796605]
  22. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD001357 [PMID: 12076408]
  23. BMJ. 2007 Jan 6;334 Suppl 1:s7 [PMID: 17204765]
  24. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD006352 [PMID: 17253589]
  25. BMJ. 2000 Dec 2;321(7273):1371-6 [PMID: 11099280]
  26. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000966 [PMID: 10796559]
  27. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Sep;45(9):789-96 [PMID: 3046553]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CATIECUtLASSdataalreadyantipsychoticstrialsincreasingcliniciansledAntipsychoticTrialsSchizophreniachosenpooledearlyexistedexistingNewAdvent"atypical"spawnednewrecentyearsnumbertrialreportsexponentiallybelieve"atypicals"better"typicals"despiteodddissentingvoiceacademicclinicalcircleslargelyignoredpublicationtwolandmarkindependentpragmaticClinicalInterventionEffectivenessCostUtilityLatestDrugsStudyprovedthoughtfully"typical"goodnewer"atypicals""leavingstudydata"CochraneReviewsaddedpool"beforeafter"comparisonAdditionnarrowingconfidenceintervalsmerelyprecisiondecreasingriskTypeIIerrorPerhapssurprisinglyshowedusturnblindeyefindingsleadsquestionwhetherfutureneedfeellessguiltycryingemperorclothesonEvidenceFitExistingEvidence:CaseEmperor'sClothes?

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.