Phimosis in children.

Sukhbir Kaur Shahid
Author Information
  1. Sukhbir Kaur Shahid: Consultant Pediatrician and Neonatologist, Shahid Medical Centre, Mumbai-400 077, India.

Abstract

Phimosis is nonretraction of prepuce. It is normally seen in younger children due to adhesions between prepuce and glans penis. It is termed pathologic when nonretractability is associated with local or urinary complaints attributed to the phimotic prepuce. Physicians still have the trouble to distinguish between these two types of phimosis. This ignorance leads to undue parental anxiety and wrong referrals to urologists. Circumcision was the mainstay of treatment for pathologic phimosis. With advent of newer effective and safe medical and conservative surgical techniques, circumcision is gradually getting outmoded. Parents and doctors should a be made aware of the noninvasive options for pathologic phimosis for better outcomes with minimal or no side-effects. Also differentiating features between physiologic and pathologic phimosis should be part of medical curriculum to minimise erroneous referrals for surgery.

References

  1. J Invest Dermatol. 1983 Aug;81(2):169-76 [PMID: 6875302]
  2. Urol Int. 2005;75(1):62-6 [PMID: 16037710]
  3. Minerva Chir. 1988 May 31;43(10):893-4 [PMID: 3412628]
  4. Med J Aust. 2003 Feb 17;178(4):148-50 [PMID: 12580737]
  5. J Indian Med Assoc. 1972 May 16;58(10):389-90 [PMID: 4644911]
  6. BJU Int. 2007 Apr;99(4):864-9 [PMID: 17378847]
  7. Br Med J. 1949 Dec 24;2(4642):1433-7, illust [PMID: 15408299]
  8. Minerva Chir. 1983 Nov 30;38(22):1903-7 [PMID: 6669302]
  9. J Urol. 1995 May;153(5):1607-9 [PMID: 7714983]
  10. BMJ. 1993 Jan 2;306(6869):28 [PMID: 8435573]
  11. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1959 Jan 21;34(2):39-47 [PMID: 13645790]
  12. Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Nov 22;161(47):6493-5 [PMID: 10778356]
  13. Indian J Pediatr. 2009 Aug;76(8):829-32 [PMID: 19381500]
  14. BJU Int. 1999 Jul;84(1):101-2 [PMID: 10444134]
  15. Indian Pediatr. 2010 Mar;47(3):282 [PMID: 20371899]
  16. J Pediatr Surg. 1994 Apr;29(4):561-3 [PMID: 8014816]
  17. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980 Aug;66(2):281-2 [PMID: 7403314]
  18. J Urol. 1997 Jul;158(1):196-7 [PMID: 9186358]
  19. Int Braz J Urol. 2010 Jan-Feb;36(1):75-85 [PMID: 20202239]
  20. Urology. 2008 Jul;72(1):68-71 [PMID: 18455770]
  21. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Oct;42(10):1749-52 [PMID: 17923208]
  22. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1992;26(2):107-10 [PMID: 1626197]
  23. Can J Urol. 2005 Apr;12(2):2598-602 [PMID: 15877942]
  24. J Urol. 1999 Sep;162(3 Pt 2):1162-4 [PMID: 10458456]
  25. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988 Sep;19(3):482-5 [PMID: 3170811]
  26. BMJ. 1988 Sep 3;297(6648):590-1 [PMID: 3139222]
  27. Lancet. 1984 Aug 11;2(8398):344 [PMID: 6146880]
  28. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2009 Feb;6(2):74-5 [PMID: 19153572]
  29. BMJ. 1993 Jan 2;306(6869):1-2 [PMID: 8435567]
  30. Urology. 2000 Aug 1;56(2):307-10 [PMID: 10925099]
  31. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1987 Mar;12(2):126-8 [PMID: 3677471]
  32. Arch Dis Child. 1968 Apr;43(228):200-3 [PMID: 5689532]
  33. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1106-8 [PMID: 12576863]
  34. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 May;64(5):327-8 [PMID: 8179528]
  35. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1999 Oct;44(5):310-2 [PMID: 10550955]
  36. J Urol. 1999 Sep;162(3 Pt 1):861-3 [PMID: 10458396]
  37. Br J Surg. 1993 Oct;80(10):1231-6 [PMID: 8242285]
  38. Pediatrics. 1986 Jul;78(1):96-9 [PMID: 3725505]
  39. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1989;151:7-10; discussion 47-52 [PMID: 2533778]
  40. Obstet Gynecol. 1971 Apr;37(4):619-22 [PMID: 5555628]
  41. BJU Int. 2003 Sep;92(4):459-62; discussion 462 [PMID: 12930440]
  42. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2004 May;50(5):305-8 [PMID: 15237481]
  43. BJU Int. 2001 Feb;87(3):239-44 [PMID: 11167650]
  44. Urol Nefrol (Mosk). 1973 May-Jun;38(3):56-7 [PMID: 4756580]
  45. BJU Int. 1999 Jan;83 Suppl 1:79-84 [PMID: 10349418]
  46. Br J Urol. 1994 Apr;73(4):428-30 [PMID: 8199833]
  47. Urol Clin North Am. 1983 Aug;10(3):543-9 [PMID: 6623741]
  48. Ann Pediatr (Paris). 1990 Dec;37(10):673-6 [PMID: 2291595]
  49. Acta Derm Venereol. 1993 Feb;73(1):55-6 [PMID: 8095754]
  50. Urol Int. 2009;82(1):81-8 [PMID: 19172103]
  51. Br Med J. 1904 Dec 24;2(2295):1704-7 [PMID: 20761835]
  52. ScientificWorldJournal. 2010 Jun 29;10:1174-9 [PMID: 20602076]
  53. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1973;7(2):97-9 [PMID: 4586345]
  54. Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Oct;74(5):364-7 [PMID: 10195034]
  55. BJU Int. 1999 Jan;83 Suppl 1:34-44 [PMID: 10349413]
  56. J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 2):1746-7; discussion 1747 [PMID: 12352350]
  57. Aust Paediatr J. 1982 Sep;18(3):219-20 [PMID: 7181775]
  58. J Urol. 1994 Sep;152(3):987-9 [PMID: 8051779]
  59. Pediatrics. 1998 Oct;102(4):E43 [PMID: 9755280]
  60. J Pediatr. 2005 Nov;147(5):705-6 [PMID: 16291369]
  61. Urol Nurs. 2006 Jun;26(3):181-94 [PMID: 16800325]
  62. Br J Urol. 1984 Jun;56(3):319-21 [PMID: 6544618]
  63. Urology. 2000 Mar;55(3):419-21 [PMID: 10699624]
  64. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001 Aug;19(3):529-46 [PMID: 11554274]
  65. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2008 Jun;54(6):427-9 [PMID: 18634440]
  66. Int J Urol. 2003 Dec;10(12):651-6 [PMID: 14633068]
  67. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1993 Jul;141(7):607-8 [PMID: 8413341]
  68. Acta Med Port. 1994 Sep;7(9):475-81 [PMID: 7992652]
  69. Med J Aust. 2003 Feb 17;178(4):155-8 [PMID: 12580740]
  70. Pediatrics. 1982 Apr;69(4):409-12 [PMID: 7070887]
  71. BJU Int. 2008 Feb;101(3):338-40 [PMID: 18005214]
  72. Ugeskr Laeger. 2001 Feb 12;163(7):922-4 [PMID: 11228788]
  73. Br J Urol. 1996 Nov;78(5):786-8 [PMID: 8976781]
  74. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Sep;71(5):275-7 [PMID: 2802472]
  75. Pediatrics. 1985 May;75(5):901-3 [PMID: 3991278]
  76. J Urol. 1973 Oct;110(4):406-7 [PMID: 4742178]
  77. Minerva Chir. 1998 Jun;53(6):561-5 [PMID: 9774854]
  78. J R Soc Med. 1992 Jun;85(6):324-5 [PMID: 1625262]
  79. Can J Urol. 2002 Apr;9(2):1492-5 [PMID: 12010594]
  80. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1981 Apr;7(4):326-30 [PMID: 7240535]
  81. J Fam Pract. 1995 Oct;41(4):370-6 [PMID: 7561711]
  82. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jul;76(4):257-8 [PMID: 8074388]
  83. J Paediatr Child Health. 1996 Aug;32(4):285-9 [PMID: 8844530]
  84. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1997 Aug;39(4):403-5 [PMID: 9316279]
  85. Int J Dermatol. 2009 Feb;48(2):121-4 [PMID: 19200183]
  86. J Urol. 1996 Nov;156(5):1813-5 [PMID: 8863623]
  87. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2004 Jan;10(1):18-9 [PMID: 14979200]
  88. Eur J Surg. 1996 Dec;162(12):969-72 [PMID: 9001879]
  89. Can Fam Physician. 2007 Mar;53(3):445-8 [PMID: 17872680]
  90. Int Surg. 2000 Apr-Jun;85(2):180-3 [PMID: 11071339]
  91. Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1267; author reply 1268 [PMID: 15596221]
  92. Arch Dermatol. 1990 Aug;126(8):1046-7 [PMID: 2383029]
  93. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975 Jun;55(6):687-9 [PMID: 1093214]
  94. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Jan 15;286(6360):186-7 [PMID: 6401522]
  95. Chin Med J (Engl). 1991 Jun;104(6):491-3 [PMID: 1874025]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pathologicphimosisprepucePhimosischildrenreferralsmedicalnonretractionnormallyseenyoungerdueadhesionsglanspenistermednonretractabilityassociatedlocalurinarycomplaintsattributedphimoticPhysiciansstilltroubledistinguishtwotypesignoranceleadsundueparentalanxietywrongurologistsCircumcisionmainstaytreatmentadventnewereffectivesafeconservativesurgicaltechniquescircumcisiongraduallygettingoutmodedParentsdoctorsmadeawarenoninvasiveoptionsbetteroutcomesminimalside-effectsAlsodifferentiatingfeaturesphysiologicpartcurriculumminimiseerroneoussurgery

Similar Articles

Cited By