Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.

Ferric C Fang, R Grant Steen, Arturo Casadevall
Author Information
  1. Ferric C Fang: Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Abstract

A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were attributable to error. In contrast, 67.4% of retractions were attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud (43.4%), duplicate publication (14.2%), and plagiarism (9.8%). Incomplete, uninformative or misleading retraction announcements have led to a previous underestimation of the role of fraud in the ongoing retraction epidemic. The percentage of scientific articles retracted because of fraud has increased ∼10-fold since 1975. Retractions exhibit distinctive temporal and geographic patterns that may reveal underlying causes.

References

  1. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1420-3 [PMID: 2406475]
  2. J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):567-70 [PMID: 21486985]
  3. BMJ. 2005 Jul 30;331(7511):288-91 [PMID: 16052023]
  4. Cell. 1981 Jul;25(1):9-21 [PMID: 6168390]
  5. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):464-70 [PMID: 18394539]
  6. BMJ. 2005 Jul 30;331(7511):266 [PMID: 16052018]
  7. Nature. 2012 Apr 04;484(7392):29-31 [PMID: 22481339]
  8. Infect Immun. 2012 Mar;80(3):891-6 [PMID: 22184414]
  9. Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):877-82 [PMID: 22622208]
  10. Nature. 2001 Oct 18;413(6857):716-8 [PMID: 11607027]
  11. J Med Ethics. 2011 Apr;37(4):249-53 [PMID: 21186208]
  12. Nature. 1989 May 11;339(6220):91-3 [PMID: 2716839]
  13. Sci Am. 2012 Aug;307(2):13 [PMID: 22844847]
  14. Science. 2007 Oct 26;318(5850):565 [PMID: 17962537]
  15. PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738 [PMID: 19478950]
  16. J Biol Chem. 1980 Sep 25;255(18):8370-3 [PMID: 6251054]
  17. Nature. 2012 Jan 04;481(7379):21-3 [PMID: 22222735]
  18. Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):531-3 [PMID: 22460880]
  19. Infect Immun. 2011 Oct;79(10):3855-9 [PMID: 21825063]
  20. Lancet. 1998 Feb 28;351(9103):637-41 [PMID: 9500320]
  21. Blood. 2010 Mar 18;115(11):2220-30 [PMID: 20061557]
  22. Infect Immun. 2012 Mar;80(3):897-901 [PMID: 22184420]
  23. PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124 [PMID: 16060722]
  24. Nutrition. 2005 Feb;21(2):286 [PMID: 15793927]
  25. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2007 Sep;63(Pt 9):941-50 [PMID: 17704562]
  26. JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):296-7 [PMID: 9676689]
  27. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991 Oct 31;180(2):1164 [PMID: 1953717]
  28. J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):113-7 [PMID: 21081306]
  29. Nature. 2006 Mar 30;440(7084):707 [PMID: 16572178]
  30. EMBO Rep. 2007 May;8(5):422-3 [PMID: 17471252]
  31. Lancet. 2005 Jul 30-Aug 5;366(9483):354-6 [PMID: 16054927]
  32. J Cell Biol. 2007 May 7;177(3):563 [PMID: 17485494]
  33. Med J Aust. 2006 Aug 7;185(3):152-4 [PMID: 16893357]
  34. Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):737-8 [PMID: 15944677]
  35. Lancet. 2002 Nov 9;360(9344):1455-61 [PMID: 12433513]
  36. J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):807-9 [PMID: 18974415]
  37. Science. 2005 Jan 21;307(5708):426-30 [PMID: 15604363]
  38. Nature. 2011 Oct 05;478(7367):26-8 [PMID: 21979026]
  39. BMJ. 1992 Apr 18;304(6833):1015-9 [PMID: 1586782]

MeSH Term

Duplicate Publications as Topic
Plagiarism
PubMed
Retraction of Publication as Topic
Scientific Misconduct
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fraudretractedarticlesretractionsattributable4%retractionscientificdetailedreview2047biomedicallife-scienceresearchindexedPubMedMay32012revealed213%errorcontrast67misconductincludingsuspected43duplicatepublication142%plagiarism98%Incompleteuninformativemisleadingannouncementsledpreviousunderestimationroleongoingepidemicpercentageincreased∼10-foldsince1975RetractionsexhibitdistinctivetemporalgeographicpatternsmayrevealunderlyingcausesMisconductaccountsmajoritypublications

Similar Articles

Cited By