Evaluating the components of an emergent literacy intervention for preschool children at risk for reading difficulties.

Christopher J Lonigan, David J Purpura, Shauna B Wilson, Patricia M Walker, Jeanine Clancy-Menchetti
Author Information
  1. Christopher J Lonigan: Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. lonigan@psy.fsu.edu

Abstract

Many preschool children are at risk for reading problems because of inadequate emergent literacy skills. Evidence supports the effectiveness of interventions to promote these skills, but questions remain about which intervention components work and whether combining intervention components will result in larger gains. In this study, 324 preschoolers (mean age=54.32 months, SD=5.88) from low-income backgrounds (46% girls and 54% boys; 82% African American, 14% White, and 4% other) were randomized to combinations of meaning-focused (dialogic reading or shared reading) and code-focused (phonological awareness, letter knowledge, or both) interventions or a control group. Interventions had statistically significant positive impacts only on measures of their respective skill domains. Combinations of interventions did not enhance outcomes across domains, indicating instructional needs in all areas of weakness for young children at risk for later reading difficulties. Less time for each intervention in the combined phonological awareness and letter knowledge intervention conditions, however, did not result in reduced effects relative to nearly twice as much time for each intervention when children received either only the phonological awareness intervention or only the letter knowledge intervention. This finding suggests that a relatively compact code-focused intervention can address the needs of children with weaknesses in both domains.

References

  1. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010 Oct;41(4):504-20 [PMID: 20421609]
  2. Child Dev. 1998 Jun;69(3):848-72 [PMID: 9680688]
  3. Except Child. 1993 May;59(6):532-46 [PMID: 7686101]
  4. Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1428-1446 [PMID: 18020822]
  5. Psychol Bull. 2011 Mar;137(2):267-96 [PMID: 21219054]
  6. Dev Psychol. 1997 May;33(3):468-79 [PMID: 9149925]
  7. Read Writ. 2010 Jul 1;23(6):607-626 [PMID: 20563245]
  8. Dev Psychol. 2000 Sep;36(5):596-613 [PMID: 10976600]
  9. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Jan;108(1):203-10 [PMID: 20739028]
  10. Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):934-47 [PMID: 12428705]
  11. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;49(4):422-32 [PMID: 18081756]
  12. J Sch Psychol. 2012 Aug;50(4):461-81 [PMID: 22710016]
  13. Dev Psychol. 2010 Nov;46(6):1556-79 [PMID: 20873927]
  14. Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):934-45 [PMID: 9383616]
  15. J Exp Child Psychol. 1998 Aug;70(2):117-41 [PMID: 9729452]
  16. Child Dev. 2008 Jul-Aug;79(4):899-913 [PMID: 18717897]
  17. Read Res Q. 2010 Jan;45(1):8-38 [PMID: 20671801]

Grants

  1. HD38880/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. HD30988/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. P50 HD052120/NICHD NIH HHS
  4. R01 HD030988/NICHD NIH HHS
  5. R01 HD038880/NICHD NIH HHS
  6. HD052120/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Awareness
Child, Preschool
Dyslexia
Female
Humans
Linguistics
Male
Phonetics
Program Evaluation
Reading
Risk

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interventionchildrenreadingriskinterventionscomponentsphonologicalawarenessletterknowledgedomainspreschoolemergentliteracyskillsresultcode-focusedneedsdifficultiestimeManyproblemsinadequateEvidencesupportseffectivenesspromotequestionsremainworkwhethercombiningwilllargergainsstudy324preschoolersmeanage=5432monthsSD=588low-incomebackgrounds46%girls54%boys82%AfricanAmerican14%White4%randomizedcombinationsmeaning-focuseddialogicsharedcontrolgroupInterventionsstatisticallysignificantpositiveimpactsmeasuresrespectiveskillCombinationsenhanceoutcomesacrossindicatinginstructionalareasweaknessyounglaterLesscombinedconditionshoweverreducedeffectsrelativenearlytwicemuchreceivedeitherfindingsuggestsrelativelycompactcanaddressweaknessesEvaluating

Similar Articles

Cited By