Cost-effectiveness of polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccination in people aged 65 and above in Poland.

Pawel Grzesiowski, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Aleksandra Kobryń, Laure Durand, Pierre-Emmanuel Puig
Author Information
  1. Pawel Grzesiowski: Infection Prevention Institute; Warsaw, Poland. beatajs@cls.edu.pl

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Invasive pneumococcal disease is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and cost implications, which could be reduced by vaccination.
AIM: To assess the cost-effectiveness of a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in the elderly (65 and older) in Poland.
METHODS: A Markov model with a 1-year cycle length was developed, allowing up to 10 cohorts to enter the model over the lifetime horizon (35 years). In the base case, costs and benefits were assessed using the public health care payer (NFZ) perspective. The analysis included routine vaccination of all elderly and high-risk (HR) elderly versus no vaccination. The analysis assumed that the government would reimburse 50% of the vaccine price. Costs and benefits were discounted 5%, with costs expressed in 2009 Polish Zloty (PLN). Extensive sensitivity analyses were carried out.
RESULTS: PPV23 vaccination targeting all elderly and HR elderly in Poland would avoid 8,935 pneumococcal infections, 2,542 hospitalisations, 671 deaths and 5,886 infections, 1,673 hospitalisations and 441 deaths respectively. The incremental cost per QALY gained would be PLN 3,382 in all elderly and PLN2,148 in HR elderly.
CONCLUSION: Vaccinating adults 65 and older regardless of risk status with a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, is cost-effective, resulting in clinical and economic benefits including a non-negligible reduction of ambulatory doctor visits, hospitalizations and, deaths in Poland.

Keywords

References

  1. Vaccine. 2008 Mar 10;26(11):1420-31 [PMID: 18272262]
  2. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 15;49(2):205-12 [PMID: 19508165]
  3. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 May;29(5):385-94 [PMID: 18521990]
  4. Euro Surveill. 2006 Sep;11(9):11-12 [PMID: 29208129]
  5. J Infect Dis. 2005 Aug 1;192(3):377-86 [PMID: 15995950]
  6. Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Feb;9(1):7-15 [PMID: 17333089]
  7. Vaccine. 2009 Mar 4;27(10):1504-10 [PMID: 19171174]
  8. J Infect. 1985 Mar;10(2):143-57 [PMID: 4008963]
  9. Value Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;6(1):9-17 [PMID: 12535234]
  10. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 1;348(18):1747-55 [PMID: 12724480]
  11. Chest. 2001 Jul;120(1):185-92 [PMID: 11451836]
  12. Eur J Health Econ. 2003 Nov;4(4):296-303 [PMID: 15609200]
  13. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):444-50 [PMID: 10987703]
  14. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jan 8;161(1):111-20 [PMID: 11146707]
  15. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008 Feb;7(1):83-95 [PMID: 18251696]
  16. BMC Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 23;8:53 [PMID: 18433473]
  17. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2008 Oct 17;83(42):373-84 [PMID: 18927997]
  18. Eur J Public Health. 2007 Jun;17(3):272-7 [PMID: 17071634]
  19. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2003 Oct 24;128(43):2267-70 [PMID: 14574642]
  20. N Engl J Med. 1991 Nov 21;325(21):1453-60 [PMID: 1944423]
  21. Am J Med. 2002 Sep;113(4):300-7 [PMID: 12361816]
  22. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Aug;52(2):229-46 [PMID: 12865398]
  23. Vaccine. 2003 Sep 8;21(25-26):3757-64 [PMID: 12922109]
  24. Drugs Aging. 1999;15 Suppl 1:21-30 [PMID: 10690792]
  25. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2010 Jul;29(169):37-40 [PMID: 20712246]
  26. Vaccine. 2006 May 15;24(20):4378-85 [PMID: 16574281]
  27. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1997 Apr 4;46(RR-8):1-24 [PMID: 9132580]
  28. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Dec;11(12):985-91 [PMID: 16307552]
  29. Respir Med. 2009 Feb;103(2):309-16 [PMID: 18804355]
  30. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):947-52 [PMID: 7978721]
  31. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011 Aug;10(8):1143-67 [PMID: 21810065]
  32. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Aug;26(8):531-40 [PMID: 17570001]
  33. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 May 1;40(9):1250-7 [PMID: 15825026]
  34. Vaccine. 2004 Aug 13;22(23-24):3214-24 [PMID: 15297076]
  35. Hum Vaccin. 2011 Apr;7(4):441-50 [PMID: 21441776]
  36. JAMA. 1993 Oct 20;270(15):1826-31 [PMID: 8411526]
  37. Vaccine. 2006 Jul 17;24(29-30):5690-9 [PMID: 16735083]
  38. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 1;48(1):57-64 [PMID: 19035779]
  39. CMAJ. 2009 Jan 6;180(1):48-58 [PMID: 19124790]
  40. Orv Hetil. 2003 Aug 24;144(34):1667-74 [PMID: 14528840]
  41. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 May;16(5):816-23 [PMID: 20409372]
  42. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(10):861-77 [PMID: 18793033]
  43. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 17;138(12):960-8 [PMID: 12809452]
  44. JAMA. 2001 Apr 4;285(13):1729-35 [PMID: 11277827]
  45. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(4):353-63 [PMID: 15180106]
  46. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Oct 1;43(7):860-8 [PMID: 16941367]
  47. Vaccine. 2006 Nov 17;24(47-48):6812-22 [PMID: 17034909]
  48. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD000422 [PMID: 23440780]
  49. Vaccine. 2010 Nov 10;28(48):7620-5 [PMID: 20887828]
  50. Vaccine. 2010 Mar 2;28(10):2214-2221 [PMID: 20056192]
  51. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Jun;17(6):591-601 [PMID: 10977396]
  52. JAMA. 1997 Oct 22-29;278(16):1333-9 [PMID: 9343464]

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Pneumococcal Infections
Pneumococcal Vaccines
Poland
Quality-Adjusted Life Years

Chemicals

23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine
Pneumococcal Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0elderlypneumococcalvaccinationPolandvaccine23-valent65benefitsHRdeathscostcost-effectivenessoldermodelcostsanalysisPLNinfectionshospitalisationseconomicpolysaccharideINTRODUCTION:InvasivediseaseassociatedsubstantialmorbiditymortalityimplicationsreducedAIM:assessMETHODS:Markov1-yearcyclelengthdevelopedallowing10cohortsenterlifetimehorizon35yearsbasecaseassessedusingpublichealthcarepayerNFZperspectiveincludedroutinehigh-riskversusassumedgovernmentreimburse50%priceCostsdiscounted5%expressed2009PolishZlotyExtensivesensitivityanalysescarriedoutRESULTS:PPV23targetingavoid8935254267158861673441respectivelyincrementalperQALYgained3382PLN2148CONCLUSION:Vaccinatingadultsregardlessriskstatuscost-effectiveresultingclinicalincludingnon-negligiblereductionambulatorydoctorvisitshospitalizationsCost-effectivenesspeopleagedburdenfundingvacccine

Similar Articles

Cited By