Histological evidence: housekeeping genes beta-actin and GAPDH are of limited value for normalization of gene expression.

Juntang Lin, Christoph Redies
Author Information
  1. Juntang Lin: Institute of Anatomy I, University of Jena School of Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. jlin@mti.uni-jena.de

Abstract

Housekeeping genes are widely used as internal controls for gene expression normalization for western blotting, northern blotting, RT-PCR, etc. They are generally thought to be expressed in all cells of the organism at similar levels because it is assumed that these genes are required for the maintenance of basic cellular function as constitutive genes. However, real-time RT-PCR experiments revealed that their expression may vary depending on the developmental stage, type of tissue examined, experimental condition, and so on. To date, no histological data on their expression are available for embryonic development. In the present study, we compared the histological expression profile of two commonly used housekeeping genes, GAPDH and beta-actin, in the developing chicken embryo by using section and whole mount in situ hybridization supplemented by RT-PCR. Our results show that neither GAPDH mRNA nor beta-actin mRNA is expressed in all cell types or tissues at high levels. Strikingly, expression levels are very low in some organs. Moreover, the two genes show partially complementary expression patterns in the liver, the vascular system and the digestive tract. For example, GAPDH is more strongly expressed in the liver than beta-actin, but at lower levels in the arteries. Vice versa, beta-actin is more strongly expressed in the gizzard than GAPDH, but it is almost absent from cardiac muscle cells. Researchers should consider these histological results when using GAPGD and beta-actin for gene expression normalization in their experiments.

References

  1. Exp Mol Pathol. 2010 Apr;88(2):326-9 [PMID: 20045408]
  2. Thorax. 2002 Sep;57(9):765-70 [PMID: 12200519]
  3. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 05;5(8):e11990 [PMID: 20700537]
  4. J Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;112(4):653-64 [PMID: 1993736]
  5. Mol Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;46(1):49-57 [PMID: 20339955]
  6. Trends Genet. 2008 Oct;24(10):481-4 [PMID: 18786740]
  7. Cell Signal. 2011 Feb;23(2):317-23 [PMID: 20727968]
  8. Dev Growth Differ. 2010 Dec;52(9):757-69 [PMID: 21158755]
  9. Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Apr;39(4):4857-67 [PMID: 22065248]
  10. J Comp Neurol. 2012 May 1;520(7):1509-31 [PMID: 22102158]
  11. J Immunol Methods. 2010 Apr 15;355(1-2):76-9 [PMID: 20171969]
  12. Nat Cell Biol. 2010 Nov;12(11):1094-100 [PMID: 20972425]
  13. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Oct;9(10):1265-73 [PMID: 16980965]
  14. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011 Oct 7;413(4):537-40 [PMID: 21925148]
  15. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22859 [PMID: 21818400]
  16. Dev Dyn. 2008 Sep;237(9):2496-505 [PMID: 18729229]
  17. BMC Mol Biol. 2010 May 21;11:39 [PMID: 20492695]
  18. Brain Res. 2008 Mar 27;1201:1-14 [PMID: 18336799]
  19. Dev Growth Differ. 1997 Aug;39(4):451-5 [PMID: 9352199]

MeSH Term

Actins
Animals
Chick Embryo
Genes, Essential
Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases
Organ Specificity
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Transcriptome

Chemicals

Actins
Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0expressiongenesbeta-actinGAPDHexpressedlevelsgenenormalizationRT-PCRhistologicalusedblottingcellsexperimentstwohousekeepingusingresultsshowmRNAliverstronglyHousekeepingwidelyinternalcontrolswesternnorthernetcgenerallythoughtorganismsimilarassumedrequiredmaintenancebasiccellularfunctionconstitutiveHoweverreal-timerevealedmayvarydependingdevelopmentalstagetypetissueexaminedexperimentalconditiondatedataavailableembryonicdevelopmentpresentstudycomparedprofilecommonlydevelopingchickenembryosectionwholemountsituhybridizationsupplementedneithercelltypestissueshighStrikinglyloworgansMoreoverpartiallycomplementarypatternsvascularsystemdigestivetractexamplelowerarteriesViceversagizzardalmostabsentcardiacmuscleResearchersconsiderGAPGDHistologicalevidence:limitedvalue

Similar Articles

Cited By