Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in malignant breast lesions using different b value combinations.

Line B Nilsen, Anne Fangberget, Oliver Geier, Therese Seierstad
Author Information
  1. Line B Nilsen: Department of Radiation Biology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4959, Nydalen 0424, Oslo, Norway. line.nilsen2@rr-research.no

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore how apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in malignant breast lesions are affected by selection of b values in the monoexponential model and to compare ADCs with diffusion coefficients (Ds) obtained from the biexponential model.
METHODS: Twenty-four women (mean age 51.3 years) with locally advanced breast cancer were included in this study. Pre-treatment diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed using a 1.5-T system with b values of 0, 50, 100, 250 and 800 s/mm(2). Thirteen different b value combinations were used to derive individual monoexponential ADC maps. All b values were used in the biexponential model.
RESULTS: Median ADC (including all b values) and D were 1.04 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (range 0.82-1.61 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and 0.84 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (range 0.17-1.56 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s), respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between ADCs and Ds. For clinically relevant b value combinations, maximum deviation between ADCs including and excluding low b values (<100 s/mm(2)) was 11.8 %.
CONCLUSION: Selection of b values strongly affects ADCs of malignant breast lesions. However, by excluding low b values, ADCs approach biexponential Ds, demonstrating that microperfusion influences the diffusion signal. Thus, care should be taken when ADC calculation includes low b values.

References

  1. NMR Biomed. 2010 May;23(4):399-405 [PMID: 20131313]
  2. Breast Cancer. 2013 Apr;20(2):137-44 [PMID: 22161277]
  3. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1030-5 [PMID: 19770326]
  4. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jun;65(6):1759-67 [PMID: 21254208]
  5. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 May;31(5):1100-5 [PMID: 20432344]
  6. Magn Reson Med. 2011 May;65(5):1437-47 [PMID: 21287591]
  7. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(1):23-9 [PMID: 18460845]
  8. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jun;196(6):1351-61 [PMID: 21606299]
  9. Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):64-73 [PMID: 20574085]
  10. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan;25(1):1-13 [PMID: 17222711]
  11. Eur Radiol. 2011 Jun;21(6):1188-99 [PMID: 21127880]
  12. Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):341-51 [PMID: 19703869]
  13. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Jun;15(6):693-704 [PMID: 12112520]
  14. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Aug;16(2):172-8 [PMID: 12203765]
  15. NMR Biomed. 2009 Jan;22(1):104-13 [PMID: 18384182]
  16. Radiology. 1988 Aug;168(2):497-505 [PMID: 3393671]
  17. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012 Oct;38(6):673-88 [PMID: 22365657]
  18. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Sep;24(7):843-7 [PMID: 16916701]
  19. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Dec;76(3):386-90 [PMID: 20413239]
  20. Neoplasia. 2009 Feb;11(2):102-25 [PMID: 19186405]
  21. Korean J Radiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;8(5):390-6 [PMID: 17923781]
  22. Acta Oncol. 2010 Apr;49(3):354-60 [PMID: 20397769]
  23. Radiology. 2008 Nov;249(2):624-30 [PMID: 18936317]
  24. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2005;4(1):35-42 [PMID: 16127252]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Algorithms
Breast Neoplasms
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Female
Humans
Image Enhancement
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bvaluesADCs2breast0-3 mm/sdiffusionmalignantlesionsmodelDsbiexponentialvaluecombinationsADClowcoefficientsmonoexponentialdiffusion-weightedmagneticresonanceimagingusing1s/mmdifferentusedincludingrangeexcludingOBJECTIVES:exploreapparentaffectedselectioncompareobtainedMETHODS:Twenty-fourwomenmeanage513yearslocallyadvancedcancerincludedstudyPre-treatmentperformed5-Tsystem50100250800ThirteenderiveindividualmapsRESULTS:MedianD04 × 1082-161 × 1084 × 1017-156 × 10respectivelystrongpositivecorrelationclinicallyrelevantmaximumdeviation<100118%CONCLUSION:SelectionstronglyaffectsHoweverapproachdemonstratingmicroperfusioninfluencessignalThuscaretakencalculationincludesQuantitativeanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By