Sensitivity of early life stages of white sturgeon, rainbow trout, and fathead minnow to copper.

David W Vardy, Johanna Oellers, Jon A Doering, Henner Hollert, John P Giesy, Markus Hecker
Author Information
  1. David W Vardy: Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 44 Campus Dr., Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B3, Canada. d.vardy@usask.ca

Abstract

Populations of white sturgeon (WS; Acipenser transmontanus) are in decline in several parts of the United States and Canada, attributed primarily to poor recruitment caused by degradation of habitats, including pollution with contaminants such as metals. Little is known about sensitivity of WS to contaminants or metals such as copper (Cu). Here, acute (96 h) mortalities of WS early life stages due to exposure to Cu under laboratory conditions are reported. Two standard test species, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), were exposed in parallel to determine relative sensitivity among species. Swim-up larvae [15 days post-hatch (dph)] and early juveniles (40-45 dph) of WS were more sensitive to Cu (LC(50) = 10 and 9-17 μg/L, respectively) than were yolksac larvae (8 dph; LC(50) = 22 μg/L) and the later juvenile life stage (100 dph; LC(50) = 54 μg/L). WS were more sensitive to Cu than rainbow trout and fathead minnow at all comparable life stages tested. Yolksac larvae of rainbow trout and fathead minnow were 1.8 and 4.6 times, respectively, more tolerant than WS, while swim-up and juvenile life stages of rainbow trout were between 1.4- and 2.4-times more tolerant than WS. When plotted in a species sensitivity distribution with other fishes, the mean acute toxicity value for early life stage WS was ranked between the 1st and 2nd centile. The WS life stage of greatest Cu sensitivity coincides with the beginning of active feeding and close association with sediment, possibly increasing risk. WS early life stages are sensitive to aqueous copper exposure and site-specific water quality guidelines and criteria should be evaluated closely to ensure adequate protection.

References

  1. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 Nov;30(11):2497-505 [PMID: 21805501]
  2. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2005 Feb;48(2):143-54 [PMID: 15772881]
  3. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Dec;113(12):1675-82 [PMID: 16330346]
  4. Environ Geochem Health. 2003 Mar;25(1):115-22 [PMID: 12901086]
  5. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2007 Aug;26(8):1657-65 [PMID: 17702339]
  6. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1978 May;19(5):608-16 [PMID: 667389]

MeSH Term

Animals
Canada
Copper
Cyprinidae
Environmental Exposure
Fishes
Lethal Dose 50
Oncorhynchus mykiss
Species Specificity
United States
Water Pollutants, Chemical

Chemicals

Water Pollutants, Chemical
Copper

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0WSlifeCuearlystagesrainbowtroutsensitivityfatheadminnowdphcopperspecieslarvaesensitiveLC50=μg/Lstagewhitesturgeoncontaminantsmetalsacuteexposurerespectively8juvenile1tolerantPopulationsAcipensertransmontanusdeclineseveralpartsUnitedStatesCanadaattributedprimarilypoorrecruitmentcauseddegradationhabitatsincludingpollutionLittleknown96hmortalitiesduelaboratoryconditionsreportedTwostandardtestOncorhynchusmykissPimephalespromelasexposedparalleldeterminerelativeamongSwim-up[15dayspost-hatch]juveniles40-45109-17yolksac22later10054comparabletestedYolksac46timesswim-up4-24-timesplotteddistributionfishesmeantoxicityvalueranked1st2ndcentilegreatestcoincidesbeginningactivefeedingcloseassociationsedimentpossiblyincreasingriskaqueoussite-specificwaterqualityguidelinescriteriaevaluatedcloselyensureadequateprotectionSensitivity

Similar Articles

Cited By