Toxicity of engineered nanomaterials: a physicochemical perspective.

Ramakrishna Podila, Jared M Brown
Author Information
  1. Ramakrishna Podila: Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.

Abstract

The global market for nanomaterial-based products is forecasted to reach 100 billion dollars per annum for 2011-2015. Extensive manufacturing and the use of engineered nanomaterials have raised concerns regarding their impact on biological response in living organisms and the environment at large. The fundamental properties of nanomaterials exhibit a complex dependence upon several factors such as their morphology, size, defects, and chemical stability. Therefore, it is exceedingly difficult to correlate their biological response with their intricate physicochemical properties. For example, varying toxic response may ensue due to different methods of nanomaterial preparation, dissimilar impurities, and defects. In this review, we surveyed the existing literature on the dependence of cytotoxicity on physicochemical properties. We found that ENM size, shape, defect density, physicochemical stability, and surface modification to be the main causes that elicit altered physiological response or cytotoxicity.

References

  1. Curr Drug Metab. 2009 Oct;10(8):895-904 [PMID: 20214584]
  2. Chem Phys Lett. 2008 Sep 20;463(1-3):145-149 [PMID: 24068836]
  3. ACS Nano. 2011 Dec 27;5(12):9772-87 [PMID: 22047207]
  4. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Feb;114(2):165-72 [PMID: 16451849]
  5. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011 Apr 24;6(6):385-91 [PMID: 21516092]
  6. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008 Mar;3(3):145-50 [PMID: 18654486]
  7. ACS Nano. 2012 May 22;6(5):3745-59 [PMID: 22482460]
  8. Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Sep 1;44(17):6532-49 [PMID: 20687602]
  9. J Environ Monit. 2007 Nov;9(11):1154-61 [PMID: 17968441]
  10. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2008 Dec;3(6):859-66 [PMID: 19025459]
  11. ACS Nano. 2010 Jan 26;4(1):365-79 [PMID: 20020753]
  12. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2007 Dec;2(6):919-27 [PMID: 18095854]
  13. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2010 Jun;5(4):523-8 [PMID: 20528447]
  14. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Dec;117(12):1813-31 [PMID: 20049198]
  15. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008 Sep;21(9):1698-705 [PMID: 18636756]
  16. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008 Sep;21(9):1690-7 [PMID: 18636755]
  17. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011 Oct;45(4):858-66 [PMID: 21398620]
  18. J Environ Monit. 2011 May;13(5):1135-44 [PMID: 21523296]
  19. Nature. 2009 Apr 16;458(7240):872-6 [PMID: 19370030]
  20. Nano Lett. 2009 Jun;9(6):2280-4 [PMID: 19408924]
  21. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008 Jul;3(7):423-8 [PMID: 18654567]
  22. Chem Soc Rev. 2012 Apr 7;41(7):2780-99 [PMID: 22086677]
  23. Toxicol Sci. 2008 Jan;101(1):4-21 [PMID: 17602205]
  24. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2010 Aug;5(6):999-1007 [PMID: 20735233]
  25. Chem Rev. 2010 Sep 8;110(9):5332-65 [PMID: 20469927]
  26. Science. 2006 Feb 3;311(5761):622-7 [PMID: 16456071]
  27. Nano Lett. 2006 Jul;6(7):1522-8 [PMID: 16834443]
  28. ACS Nano. 2011 Jan 25;5(1):13-20 [PMID: 21261306]
  29. Biomaterials. 2010 Nov;31(31):8022-31 [PMID: 20688385]
  30. Nanomedicine. 2010 Apr;6(2):245-56 [PMID: 19699321]
  31. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2009 Jan;27(1):1-35 [PMID: 19204862]
  32. ACS Nano. 2010 Jul 27;4(7):3580-90 [PMID: 20695513]
  33. ACS Nano. 2011 May 24;5(5):3693-700 [PMID: 21500856]
  34. ACS Nano. 2011 Feb 22;5(2):968-74 [PMID: 21204566]
  35. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008 Sep;27(9):1825-51 [PMID: 19086204]
  36. Chem Commun (Camb). 2011 Jul 7;47(25):7025-38 [PMID: 21479319]
  37. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 11;108(41):16968-73 [PMID: 21969544]
  38. J Nanopart Res. 2010 Sep;12(7):2313-2333 [PMID: 21170131]
  39. Mol Biosyst. 2005 Jul;1(2):176-82 [PMID: 16880981]
  40. Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Sep 1;43(17):6463-74 [PMID: 19764203]
  41. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2011 Jul;6(5):837-47 [PMID: 21793675]
  42. Nano Lett. 2006 Aug;6(8):1609-16 [PMID: 16895344]
  43. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2011 Aug 18;8:24 [PMID: 21851604]
  44. Toxicology. 2010 Feb 28;269(1):41-53 [PMID: 20079395]
  45. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012 Jan;31(1):50-9 [PMID: 22038832]
  46. Nanomedicine. 2008 Jun;4(2):167-71 [PMID: 18329962]
  47. Nat Mater. 2009 Jul;8(7):543-57 [PMID: 19525947]
  48. J Environ Qual. 2010 Nov-Dec;39(6):1954-65 [PMID: 21284292]
  49. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2011 Mar;41(3):213-29 [PMID: 21244219]
  50. Waste Manag. 2009 Sep;29(9):2587-95 [PMID: 19427190]
  51. Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Jul 15;40(14):4336-45 [PMID: 16903268]
  52. Nano Lett. 2006 Apr;6(4):662-8 [PMID: 16608261]
  53. J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Jun 2;126(21):6520-1 [PMID: 15161257]

Grants

  1. R01 ES019311/NIEHS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Humans
Nanoparticles
Nanostructures
Surface Properties

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0responsephysicochemicalpropertiesengineerednanomaterialsbiologicaldependencesizedefectsstabilitycytotoxicityglobalmarketnanomaterial-basedproductsforecastedreach100billiondollarsperannum2011-2015ExtensivemanufacturinguseraisedconcernsregardingimpactlivingorganismsenvironmentlargefundamentalexhibitcomplexuponseveralfactorsmorphologychemicalThereforeexceedinglydifficultcorrelateintricateexamplevaryingtoxicmayensueduedifferentmethodsnanomaterialpreparationdissimilarimpuritiesreviewsurveyedexistingliteraturefoundENMshapedefectdensitysurfacemodificationmaincauseselicitalteredphysiologicalToxicitynanomaterials:perspective

Similar Articles

Cited By (32)