Comparison of two methods for the estimation of subcortical volume and asymmetry using magnetic resonance imaging: a methodological study.

Tolga Ertekin, Niyazi Acer, Semra Içer, Ahmet T Ilıca
Author Information
  1. Tolga Ertekin: Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Erciyes, Kayseri 38039, Turkey. tolga.ertekin@yahoo.com.tr

Abstract

PURPOSE: The subcortical brain structures are associated with other structures of nervous system; therefore, they have major influence on sensory-motor, limbic and cognitive information processing. Magnetic resonance imaging provides a detailed knowledge of normal and diseased anatomical structures for medical research. The aim of the current study was to compare the volumes of subcortical brain structures and determine the probable volumetric asymmetry in healthy subjects using stereological (point-counting) and semi-automatic segmentation methods.
METHODS: MR scans were obtained from 30 subjects (17 males, 13 females) free of any psychiatric, neurological or cognitive impairment. MR images were analyzed by using stereological (point-counting) and semi-automatic segmentation methods.
RESULTS: We did not find any significant differences among the subjects with respect to gender using both methods. This study showed no significant asymmetry in subcortical structures according to methods. Also, no significant difference was found between point-counting and semi-automated segmentation methods for the volumes of subcortical structures (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: From these results, it can be concluded that the semi-automated segmentation method and stereological technique can be used for reliable volume estimation of subcortical structures. However, the stereological method takes less time than semi-automated segmentation; it is simple, reliable and inexpensive. Further studies are required with larger samples in order to support these data.

References

  1. Ann Anat. 2008 Nov 20;190(5):452-60 [PMID: 18723333]
  2. Psychiatry Res. 2008 Aug 30;163(3):279-88 [PMID: 18657402]
  3. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jul 1;60(1):22-31 [PMID: 16406249]
  4. Psychiatry Res. 2011 Nov 30;194(2):163-75 [PMID: 21899988]
  5. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Sep;29(8):1537-43 [PMID: 18782907]
  6. Neuroimage. 2009 May 15;46(1):177-92 [PMID: 19233293]
  7. Brain Res. 2009 Jun 18;1276:77-82 [PMID: 19393230]
  8. Psychiatry Res. 1995 Nov 10;61(4):209-29 [PMID: 8748466]
  9. Schizophr Res. 2002 Dec 1;58(2-3):173-83 [PMID: 12409156]
  10. Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Jan;58(1):48-53 [PMID: 17197941]
  11. J Med Phys. 2010 Jan;35(1):3-14 [PMID: 20177565]
  12. Brain. 2007 Mar;130(Pt 3):678-92 [PMID: 17303593]
  13. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012 Nov;34(9):825-32 [PMID: 22526169]
  14. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012 Nov;34(9):819-24 [PMID: 22526167]
  15. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008 Jun;30(4):335-9 [PMID: 18292960]
  16. Neuroimage. 2003 Apr;18(4):880-94 [PMID: 12725764]
  17. Cereb Cortex. 2005 Jun;15(6):846-53 [PMID: 15459079]
  18. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(1):1-5 [PMID: 19602887]
  19. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Apr;24(4):644-7 [PMID: 12695196]
  20. Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 1;30(2):436-43 [PMID: 16300968]
  21. Radiat Med. 2006 Jul;24(6):422-30 [PMID: 16958423]
  22. J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 23;29(38):11772-82 [PMID: 19776264]
  23. Alcohol Res Health. 2011;34(1):121-31 [PMID: 23580049]
  24. Pediatr Neurol. 1991 Sep-Oct;7(5):347-51 [PMID: 1764136]
  25. NeuroRx. 2004 Apr;1(2):196-205 [PMID: 15717020]
  26. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Oct;18(8):1017-25 [PMID: 11121707]
  27. J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Apr 30;179(1):71-7 [PMID: 19428514]
  28. Nephron. 2001 Feb;87(2):143-7 [PMID: 11244309]
  29. Psychiatry Res. 2001 Apr 10;106(2):65-80 [PMID: 11306247]
  30. Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 1;32(4):1562-75 [PMID: 16875847]
  31. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Aug;30(8):2667-75 [PMID: 19172651]
  32. J Neurol Sci. 2005 Dec 15;239(1):45-52 [PMID: 16225890]
  33. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(4):433-48 [PMID: 21319489]
  34. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Sep;30(8):1552-60 [PMID: 19497964]
  35. Psychiatry Res. 2007 Feb 28;154(2):191-8 [PMID: 17258898]
  36. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jan;57(1):96-101 [PMID: 16112829]
  37. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009 Mar;31(3):177-81 [PMID: 18941706]
  38. Eur J Radiol. 2003 Aug;47(2):164-70 [PMID: 12880999]
  39. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008 Aug;30(6):489-94 [PMID: 18478176]
  40. Eur J Radiol. 2005 Oct;56(1):12-9 [PMID: 16168259]
  41. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Sep-Oct;12(5):927-9 [PMID: 1950923]
  42. Schizophr Res. 2001 Apr 15;49(1-2):1-52 [PMID: 11343862]
  43. N Engl J Med. 1992 Aug 27;327(9):604-12 [PMID: 1640954]
  44. Schizophr Res. 2007 Jan;89(1-3):59-71 [PMID: 17071057]
  45. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 May;18(4):439-53 [PMID: 10788722]
  46. Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 1;32(1):180-94 [PMID: 16651008]
  47. Pituitary. 2011 Mar;14(1):31-8 [PMID: 20809112]
  48. Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):16-24 [PMID: 20708694]
  49. Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):907-22 [PMID: 21352927]
  50. Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 15;44(4):1324-33 [PMID: 19038349]
  51. J Microsc. 1987 Sep;147(Pt 3):229-63 [PMID: 3430576]
  52. Neuroimage. 2001 Sep;14(3):531-45 [PMID: 11506528]
  53. Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):915-24 [PMID: 16061401]
  54. Anat Sci Int. 2011 Jun;86(2):78-85 [PMID: 20734181]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Anthropometry
Brain
Child
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Organ Size
Reference Values
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0structuressubcorticalmethodssegmentationusingstereologicalstudyasymmetrysubjectspoint-countingsignificantsemi-automatedbraincognitiveresonancevolumessemi-automaticMRcanmethodreliablevolumeestimationPURPOSE:associatednervoussystemthereforemajorinfluencesensory-motorlimbicinformationprocessingMagneticimagingprovidesdetailedknowledgenormaldiseasedanatomicalmedicalresearchaimcurrentcomparedetermineprobablevolumetrichealthyMETHODS:scansobtained3017males13femalesfreepsychiatricneurologicalimpairmentimagesanalyzedRESULTS:finddifferencesamongrespectgendershowedaccordingAlsodifferencefoundp > 005CONCLUSION:resultsconcludedtechniqueusedHowevertakeslesstimesimpleinexpensivestudiesrequiredlargersamplesordersupportdataComparisontwomagneticimaging:methodological

Similar Articles

Cited By