Suppressive and facilitative effects of shock intensity and interresponse times followed by shock.

Jessica B Everly, Michael Perone
Author Information
  1. Jessica B Everly: University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg, Greensburg, PA 15601, USA. jbl100@pitt.edu

Abstract

Although response-dependent shock often suppresses responding, response facilitation can occur. In two experiments, we examined the suppressive and facilitative effects of shock by manipulating shock intensity and the interresponse times that produced shock. Rats' lever presses were reinforced on a variable-interval 40-s schedule of food presentation. Shock followed either long or short interresponse times. Shock intensity was raised from 0.05 mA to 0.4 mA or 0.8 mA. Overall, shock contingent on long interresponse times punished long interresponse times and increased response rates. Shock contingent on short interresponse times punished short interresponse times and decreased response rates. In Experiment 1, raising the range of interresponse times that produced shock enhanced these effects. In Experiment 2, the effects of shock intensity depended on the interresponse times that produced shock. When long interresponse times produced shock, low intensities increased response rates. High intensities decreased response rates. When short interresponse times produced shock, high shock intensities punished short interresponse times and decreased response rates more than low intensities. The results may explain why punishment procedures occasionally facilitate responding and establish parameters for future studies of punishment.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):803-8 [PMID: 16811326]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Jul;78(1):17-30 [PMID: 12144310]
  3. Science. 1961 Jan 6;133(3445):36 [PMID: 13683864]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 May;35(3):311-22 [PMID: 16812219]
  5. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Feb;55:44-51 [PMID: 14454073]
  6. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1971 Apr;75(1):73-6 [PMID: 5559221]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):521-7 [PMID: 5964507]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):95-107 [PMID: 16811311]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:141-8 [PMID: 13965779]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):285-92 [PMID: 5660709]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6:399-406 [PMID: 13961497]
  12. Behav Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;19(7):683-97 [PMID: 18797245]
  13. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1964 Dec;58:456-9 [PMID: 14241067]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Nov;48(3):407-16 [PMID: 16812501]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 May;41(3):291-308 [PMID: 6736858]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:299-300 [PMID: 14019311]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Apr;3:123-42 [PMID: 13795412]
  18. J Exp Psychol. 1967 May;74(1):114-23 [PMID: 6032563]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Oct;2:301-5 [PMID: 13795413]
  20. Psychol Rep. 1965 Jun;16:721-30 [PMID: 14302994]
  21. J Exp Psychol. 1966 Jul;72(1):125-31 [PMID: 5967718]
  22. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):237-46 [PMID: 16811278]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529-30 [PMID: 13945507]
  24. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Mar;51(2):173-84 [PMID: 2708936]
  25. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Nov;44(3):355-66 [PMID: 16812438]
  26. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Sep;11(5):525-35 [PMID: 5722412]
  27. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Sep;58(2):361-75 [PMID: 16812670]
  28. Psychol Rev. 1963 Sep;70:369-402 [PMID: 14049776]
  29. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):23-7 [PMID: 5636852]
  30. Psychol Bull. 1988 Nov;104(3):348-62 [PMID: 3062656]
  31. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):247-74 [PMID: 11453618]
  32. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6:115-22 [PMID: 13961496]
  33. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Jun;63(3):486-92 [PMID: 6064394]
  34. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:343-7 [PMID: 13863579]
  35. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Apr;59:295-7 [PMID: 14288360]
  36. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jan;35(1):55-67 [PMID: 16812200]
  37. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):403-11 [PMID: 16811364]
  38. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Feb;63(1):39-44 [PMID: 6029717]
  39. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Sep;52(3):145-61 [PMID: 13357697]

MeSH Term

Animals
Association Learning
Avoidance Learning
Conditioning, Operant
Male
Punishment
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Reaction Time
Reinforcement Schedule
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0shockinterresponsetimesresponseintensityproducedshortrateseffectslongintensitiesShock0mApunisheddecreasedpunishmentrespondingfacilitativeleverfollowedcontingentincreasedExperimentlowAlthoughresponse-dependentoftensuppressesfacilitationcanoccurtwoexperimentsexaminedsuppressivemanipulatingRats'pressesreinforcedvariable-interval40-sschedulefoodpresentationeitherraised0548Overall1raisingrangeenhanced2dependedHighhighresultsmayexplainproceduresoccasionallyfacilitateestablishparametersfuturestudiesSuppressiveelectricpressrats

Similar Articles

Cited By