Contact investigation in households of patients with tuberculosis in Hanoi, Vietnam: a prospective cohort study.

Gregory James Fox, Nguyen Viet Nhung, Dinh Ngoc Sy, Luu Thi Lien, Nguyen Kim Cuong, Warwick John Britton, Guy Barrington Marks
Author Information
  1. Gregory James Fox: Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. greg.fox@sydney.edu.au

Abstract

SETTING: Existing tuberculosis control strategies in Vietnam are based on symptomatic patients attending health services for investigation. This approach has not resulted in substantial reductions in the prevalence of tuberculosis disease, despite the National Tuberculosis Program achieving high treatment completion rates. Alternative approaches are being considered.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and yield of contact investigation in households of patients with smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis among household members of tuberculosis patients in Hanoi, Vietnam.
METHODS: Household contacts of patients with smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis were recruited at four urban and rural District Tuberculosis Units in Hanoi. Clinical and radiological screening was conducted at baseline, six months and 12 months. Sputum microscopy and culture was performed in contacts suspected of having tuberculosis. MIRU-VNTR molecular testing was used to compare the strains of patients and their contacts with disease.
RESULTS: Among 545 household contacts of 212 patients, four were diagnosed with tuberculosis at baseline (prevalence 734 cases per 100,000 persons, 95% CI 17-1451) and one was diagnosed with tuberculosis during the subsequent 12 months after initial screening (incidence 180 cases per 100,000 person-years, 95% CI 44-131). Two of these cases were culture positive for M. tuberculosis and both had identical or near-identical MIRU-VNTR strain types.
CONCLUSION: Household contacts of patients with potentially infectious forms of tuberculosis have a high prevalence of disease. Household contact investigation is feasible in Vietnam. Further research is required to investigate its effectiveness.

References

  1. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Mar;45(3):691-7 [PMID: 17192416]
  2. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Dec;7(12 Suppl 3):S479-85 [PMID: 14677841]
  3. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Apr;88(4):273-80 [PMID: 20431791]
  4. Thorax. 2005 Feb;60(2):136-7 [PMID: 15681502]
  5. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Dec;7(12 Suppl 3):S501-9 [PMID: 14677844]
  6. Thorax. 1999 Feb;54(2):136-40 [PMID: 10325918]
  7. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Oct;15(10):1570-7 [PMID: 19861047]
  8. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Nov;8(11):1257-9 [PMID: 12453352]
  9. Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Oct;136(10):1342-9 [PMID: 18177518]
  10. Tubercle. 1978 Dec;59(4):233-43 [PMID: 726081]
  11. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22500 [PMID: 21799875]
  12. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 May;11(5):562-6 [PMID: 17439682]
  13. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Mar;5(3):213-5 [PMID: 11326818]
  14. Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Aug 1;172(3):318-26 [PMID: 20576754]
  15. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Sep;5(9):855-60 [PMID: 11573898]
  16. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Nov;8(11):1224-9 [PMID: 12453346]
  17. PLoS One. 2009 Dec 14;4(12):e8257 [PMID: 20011589]
  18. Thorax. 2013 Mar;68(3):247-55 [PMID: 22717944]
  19. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Oct;9(10):1088-96 [PMID: 16229219]
  20. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;158(2):465-9 [PMID: 9700122]
  21. Thorax. 2000 Nov;55(11):887-901 [PMID: 11050256]
  22. BMC Med Ethics. 2004 Mar 12;5:E2 [PMID: 15113419]
  23. N Engl J Med. 1967 Sep 14;277(11):562-7 [PMID: 5298618]
  24. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 07;(9):CD008477 [PMID: 21901723]
  25. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2011;31(4):297-9 [PMID: 22041463]
  26. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000 Oct;4(10):920-4 [PMID: 11055758]
  27. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1963 Nov;53:1761-9 [PMID: 14060829]
  28. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Aug;102(8):797-804 [PMID: 18513768]
  29. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Dec;7(12 Suppl 3):S333-6 [PMID: 14677818]
  30. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011 Dec;15(12):1620-3 [PMID: 22118168]
  31. Lancet. 2004 Jan 17;363(9404):212-4 [PMID: 14738796]
  32. Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1797-9 [PMID: 11684606]
  33. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Jan;11(1):12-5 [PMID: 17217124]
  34. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 Apr;119(4):603-9 [PMID: 443630]
  35. Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1902-13 [PMID: 22608339]
  36. JAMA. 1974 Jul 29;229(5):528-33 [PMID: 4545925]
  37. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;31(7):1619-30 [PMID: 22095153]
  38. PLoS One. 2010 May 06;5(5):e10508 [PMID: 20463900]
  39. Eur Respir J. 2010 Oct;36(4):925-49 [PMID: 20889463]
  40. Eur Respir J. 2002 Apr;19(4):765-75 [PMID: 11999007]
  41. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Jan;13(1):84-92 [PMID: 19105884]
  42. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Apr;13(4):446-53 [PMID: 19335949]
  43. Epidemiol Infect. 2007 Feb;135(2):346-52 [PMID: 17291368]
  44. Eur Respir J. 2013 Jan;41(1):140-56 [PMID: 22936710]

MeSH Term

Cohort Studies
Contact Tracing
Family Characteristics
Humans
Prevalence
Program Evaluation
Prospective Studies
Tuberculosis
Vietnam

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tuberculosispatientscontactsinvestigationVietnamprevalencediseasepositiveHanoiHouseholdmonthscasesTuberculosishighcontacthouseholdssmearpulmonaryhouseholdfourscreeningbaseline12cultureMIRU-VNTRdiagnosedper10000095%CISETTING:ExistingcontrolstrategiesbasedsymptomaticattendinghealthservicesapproachresultedsubstantialreductionsdespiteNationalProgramachievingtreatmentcompletionratesAlternativeapproachesconsideredOBJECTIVE:determinefeasibilityyieldamongmembersMETHODS:recruitedurbanruralDistrictUnitsClinicalradiologicalconductedsixSputummicroscopyperformedsuspectedmoleculartestingusedcomparestrainsRESULTS:Among545212734persons17-1451onesubsequentinitialincidence180person-years44-131TwoMidenticalnear-identicalstraintypesCONCLUSION:potentiallyinfectiousformsfeasibleresearchrequiredinvestigateeffectivenessContactVietnam:prospectivecohortstudy

Similar Articles

Cited By