Fine-scale selection by ovipositing females increases egg survival.

Brian G Gall, Edmund D Brodie, Edmund D Brodie
Author Information
  1. Brian G Gall: Department of Biology, Hanover College P.O. Box 108, Hanover, Indiana, 47243.

Abstract

One of the most important defenses for the eggs of ovipositing female organisms is to avoid being laid in the same habitat as their predators. However, for most organisms, completely avoiding an offspring's predators is not possible. One mechanism that has been largely overlooked is for females to partition an oviposition site into microhabitats that differ in quality for offspring survival. We conducted a series of experiments to examine whether female newts avoid microhabitats utilized by their offspring's primary predator, caddisfly larvae. Female newts avoided laying eggs near predatory caddisflies and shifted egg laying upward in the water column when provided with a vertical dimension. Caddisflies were attracted to chemical stimuli from female newts and their eggs, yet primarily used benthic areas in experimental chambers. Finally, results from a field experiment indicate that the behavioral strategy employed by female newts increases offspring survival. This subset of non-genetic maternal effects, micro-oviposition avoidance, is likely an important yet underexplored mechanism by which females increase offspring survival.

Keywords

References

  1. Am Nat. 2008 Oct;172(4):486-96 [PMID: 18793093]
  2. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:57-92 [PMID: 11729069]
  3. Evolution. 1982 May;36(3):581-590 [PMID: 28568036]
  4. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Feb 1;13(2):64-9 [PMID: 21238202]
  5. J Chem Ecol. 1988 Mar;14(3):917-28 [PMID: 24276141]
  6. Oecologia. 1984 Jul;63(1):23-29 [PMID: 28311161]
  7. J Insect Physiol. 2010 Jun;56(6):646-9 [PMID: 20138050]
  8. Oecologia. 1985 Apr;66(1):68-73 [PMID: 28310813]
  9. Evolution. 1983 Mar;37(2):389-403 [PMID: 28568358]
  10. Oecologia. 2010 Jun;163(2):373-84 [PMID: 20112109]
  11. J Chem Ecol. 2003 Aug;29(8):1729-39 [PMID: 12956503]
  12. Toxicon. 2012 Nov;60(6):1057-62 [PMID: 22867631]
  13. Evolution. 1988 Jan;42(1):118-128 [PMID: 28563838]
  14. Evolution. 1989 May;43(3):485-503 [PMID: 28568400]
  15. Evolution. 1988 Sep;42(5):977-985 [PMID: 28581180]
  16. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 22;267(1457):2065-9 [PMID: 11416910]
  17. Oecologia. 2008 Aug;157(2):287-94 [PMID: 18607636]
  18. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 27;364(1520):1107-15 [PMID: 19324615]
  19. Oecologia. 2005 Jan;142(2):316-25 [PMID: 15503166]
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 28;101(52):18048-52 [PMID: 15601773]
  21. Nature. 1995 Dec 7;378(6557):563-4 [PMID: 8524387]
  22. Science. 1964 May 29;144(3622):1100-10 [PMID: 14148429]
  23. Oecologia. 2007 Jun;152(3):389-400 [PMID: 17356812]
  24. Ecol Evol. 2012 Jul;2(7):1637-43 [PMID: 22957168]
  25. Oecologia. 1981 Sep;50(3):342-346 [PMID: 28309052]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0femalesurvivalnewtseggsfemalesoffspringOneimportantovipositingorganismsavoidhabitatpredatorsoffspring'smechanismovipositionmicrohabitatslayingeggyetincreasesselectiondefenseslaidHowevercompletelyavoidingpossiblelargelyoverlookedpartitionsitedifferqualityconductedseriesexperimentsexaminewhetherutilizedprimarypredatorcaddisflylarvaeFemaleavoidednearpredatorycaddisfliesshiftedupwardwatercolumnprovidedverticaldimensionCaddisfliesattractedchemicalstimuliprimarilyusedbenthicareasexperimentalchambersFinallyresultsfieldexperimentindicatebehavioralstrategyemployedsubsetnon-geneticmaternaleffectsmicro-ovipositionavoidancelikelyunderexploredincreaseFine-scaleChoiceTarichagranulosatetrodotoxin

Similar Articles

Cited By