Ocular versus cervical VEMPs in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome.

M Geraldine Zuniga, Kristen L Janky, Kimanh D Nguyen, Miriam S Welgampola, John P Carey
Author Information
  1. M Geraldine Zuniga: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds or ocular VEMP (oVEMP) amplitudes are more sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS).
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-control study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with SCDS (mean age 48 yr; range, 31-66 yr) and 25 age-matched controls (mean age 48 yr; range, 30-66 yr).
INTERVENTION(S): cVEMP and oVEMP in response to air-conducted sound. All patients underwent surgery for repair of SCDS.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): cVEMP thresholds; oVEMP n10 and peak-to-peak amplitudes.
RESULTS: cVEMP threshold results showed sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80% to 100% for the diagnosis of SCDS. In contrast, oVEMP amplitudes demonstrated sensitivity and specificity greater than 90%.
CONCLUSION: oVEMP amplitudes are superior to cVEMP thresholds in the diagnosis of SCDS.

References

  1. Laryngoscope. 2005 Oct;115(10):1717-27 [PMID: 16222184]
  2. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Feb;28(2):250-7 [PMID: 17255894]
  3. Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jan;34(1):127-34 [PMID: 23151775]
  4. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;119(7):1674-82 [PMID: 18479965]
  5. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Mar;124(3):249-58 [PMID: 9525507]
  6. Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):337-43 [PMID: 12563123]
  7. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Aug;143(2):274-80 [PMID: 20647134]
  8. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Oct;942:259-73 [PMID: 11710468]
  9. Neurology. 2008 Feb 5;70(6):464-72 [PMID: 18250291]
  10. Ear Hear. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):508-20 [PMID: 22441357]
  11. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;57(2):190-7 [PMID: 8126503]
  12. Neurology. 2007 Apr 10;68(15):1227-9 [PMID: 17420408]
  13. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Aug;116(8):1938-48 [PMID: 15979939]
  14. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jul;31(5):793-802 [PMID: 20517167]
  15. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(6):633-40 [PMID: 10586994]
  16. Otol Neurotol. 2004 May;25(3):323-32 [PMID: 15129113]
  17. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2001;545:41-9 [PMID: 11677740]

Grants

  1. R01 DC005040/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. T32 DC000023/NIDCD NIH HHS
  3. T32DC000023/NIDCD NIH HHS
  4. NIH/NIDCD R01DC005040/PHS HHS

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Aged
Case-Control Studies
Ear Diseases
Electromyography
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Semicircular Canals
Vestibular Diseases
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cVEMPoVEMPSCDSamplitudesdiagnosisyrthresholdssuperiorcervicalsemicircularcanaldehiscencesyndromepatientsmeanage48rangeS:sensitivityspecificityOBJECTIVES:determinewhethervestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialocularVEMPsensitivespecificSTUDYDESIGN:Prospectivecase-controlstudySETTING:TertiaryreferralcenterSUBJECTSANDMETHODS:Twenty-nine31-6625age-matchedcontrols30-66INTERVENTIONresponseair-conductedsoundunderwentsurgeryrepairMAINOUTCOMEMEASUREn10peak-to-peakRESULTS:thresholdresultsshowedranging80%100%contrastdemonstratedgreater90%CONCLUSION:OcularversusVEMPs

Similar Articles

Cited By