Emergent relations in pigeons following training with temporal samples.

Edson M Huziwara, Saulo M Velasco, Gerson Y Tomanari, Deisy G de Souza, Armando D Machado
Author Information
  1. Edson M Huziwara: Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. huziwara.edson@gmail.com

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated emergent conditional relations in pigeons using a symbolic matching-to-sample task with temporal stimuli as the samples and hues as the comparisons. Both experiments comprised three phases. In Phase I, pigeons learned to choose a red keylight (R) but not a green keylight (G) after a 1-s signal. They also learned to choose G but not R after a 4-s signal. In Phase II, correct responding consisted of choosing a blue keylight (B) after a 4-s signal and a yellow keylight (Y) after a 16-s signal. Comparisons G and B were both related to the same 4-s sample, whereas comparisons R and Y had no common sample. In Phase III, R and G were presented as samples, and B and Y were presented as the comparisons. The choice of B was correct following G, and the choice of Y was correct following R. If a relation between comparisons that shared a common sample were to emerge, then responding to B given G would be more likely than responding to Y given R. The results were generally consistent with this prediction, suggesting, for the first time in pigeons, the emergence of novel relations that involve temporal stimuli as nodal samples.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):243-57 [PMID: 3805973]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):399-408 [PMID: 16812749]
  3. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):345-82; discussion 383-5 [PMID: 8926226]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):35-47 [PMID: 16812425]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):235-51 [PMID: 9821678]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Mar;71(2):195-214 [PMID: 10220930]
  7. Learn Behav. 2005 Feb;33(1):111-22 [PMID: 15971498]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 May;41(3):251-66 [PMID: 6736856]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Mar;73(2):141-61 [PMID: 10784006]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):223-38 [PMID: 5660703]
  11. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Oct;42(4):273-81 [PMID: 14888834]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):267-82 [PMID: 21541171]
  13. Behav Processes. 2011 Mar;86(3):305-15 [PMID: 21238554]
  14. J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Mar;14(1):5-13 [PMID: 5550631]
  15. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):113-7 [PMID: 15116995]
  16. Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):195-206 [PMID: 16616993]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45 [PMID: 16812849]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):257-82 [PMID: 19070336]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):65-80 [PMID: 16903493]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):405-45 [PMID: 16812256]
  21. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):467-95 [PMID: 12507015]
  22. Am J Ment Defic. 1973 Mar;77(5):515-23 [PMID: 4267398]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Nov;66(3):267-81 [PMID: 8921611]
  24. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Sep;84(2):147-65 [PMID: 16262184]
  25. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):297-304 [PMID: 3711776]
  26. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):117-37 [PMID: 10418157]
  27. Am J Ment Defic. 1973 Mar;77(5):556-66 [PMID: 4122227]
  28. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):173-82 [PMID: 1645099]
  29. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):395-409 [PMID: 16812547]
  30. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5-22 [PMID: 7057129]
  31. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):283-95 [PMID: 21541172]
  32. Psychol Rev. 1997 Apr;104(2):241-65 [PMID: 9127582]
  33. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23-44 [PMID: 7057127]
  34. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241 [PMID: 16812780]
  35. Psychol Rep. 1991 Feb;68(1):51-60 [PMID: 2034778]
  36. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):387-91 [PMID: 12921414]
  37. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1977 Jul;3(3):216-28 [PMID: 881613]
  38. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):385-92 [PMID: 16812585]
  39. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Jun;132(2):266-76 [PMID: 12825640]

MeSH Term

Animals
Choice Behavior
Color Perception
Columbidae
Conditioning, Operant
Discrimination Learning
Time Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RGBYpigeonssamplescomparisonskeylightsignalrelationstemporalPhase4-scorrectrespondingsamplefollowingexperimentsstimulilearnedchoosecommonpresentedchoicegiventwoinvestigatedemergentconditionalusingsymbolicmatching-to-sampletaskhuescomprisedthreephasesredgreen1-salsoIIconsistedchoosingblueyellow16-sComparisonsrelatedwhereasIIIrelationsharedemergelikelyresultsgenerallyconsistentpredictionsuggestingfirsttimeemergencenovelinvolvenodalEmergenttraining

Similar Articles

Cited By