Trans-vaginal repair of gynecological supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistulae: A worthy option!

N Rajamaheswari, Archana Bharti Chhikara, K Seethalakshmi, Anupama Bail, Sugandha Agarwal
Author Information
  1. N Rajamaheswari: Department of Urogynaecology, Government Kasturba Gandhi Hospital and Institute of Social Obstetrics, Madras Medical College, Triplicane, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the appropriateness of vaginal approach for gynecological supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistulae.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive women with gynecological supratrigonal Vesico Vaginal Fistulae (VVF) repaired at the fistula unit of Urogynecology department between 1996 and 2011 was done.Out of 48 cases of supratrigonal VVF of gynecological origin identified; 34 (70.8%) cases were repaired vaginally and 14 (36.8%) abdominally with a mean follow-up period of 52.8 (2-132) months.
RESULTS: Overall 95.8% were successfully cured at first attempt. The success rate of vaginal repair (94.8%) at first attempt was comparable to that of abdominal repair (100%) (P value = 0.8946). Amongst two failed vaginal repairs, one was successfully cured by subsequent vaginal repair and other by abdominal repair.
CONCLUSION: Three fourth gynecological supratrigonal VVF can be repaired vaginally in first attempt with success rate comparable to abdominal approach. On the basis of this study we postulate that vaginal approach should be preferred over abdominal approach for repair of all vaginally accessible supratrigonal VVF of gynecological origin.

Keywords

References

  1. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005 Jul;60(7 Suppl 1):S3-S51 [PMID: 16034313]
  2. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Sep;72(3 Pt 1):313-9 [PMID: 3043287]
  3. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Jan;17(1):28-31 [PMID: 17204216]
  4. Urologe A. 1998 Jan;37(1):70-4 [PMID: 9540187]
  5. J Urol. 1980 Mar;123(3):370-4 [PMID: 7359641]
  6. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003 Dec;48(3):295-304 [PMID: 14693342]
  7. J Urol. 1995 Apr;153(4):1110-2; discussion 1112-3 [PMID: 7869475]
  8. Urol Int. 2009;82(4):404-10 [PMID: 19506406]
  9. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1033-6 [PMID: 12576839]
  10. Eur Urol. 2006 Mar;49(3):551-6 [PMID: 16413101]
  11. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Dec;175(6):501-6 [PMID: 1448730]
  12. J Urol. 1999 Feb;161(2):566-8 [PMID: 9915449]
  13. Indian J Urol. 2007 Oct;23(4):372-6 [PMID: 19718291]
  14. Int Urol Nephrol. 1988;20(3):265-8 [PMID: 3403195]
  15. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Mar;21(3):337-42 [PMID: 19949771]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0repairgynecologicalsupratrigonalvaginalapproachVVF8%abdominalvesicovaginalrepairedvaginallyfirstattemptfistulaecasesoriginsuccessfullycuredsuccessratecomparableOBJECTIVE:determineappropriatenessPATIENTSANDMETHODS:RetrospectivereviewconsecutivewomenVesicoVaginalFistulaefistulaunitUrogynecologydepartment19962011doneOut48identified34701436abdominallymeanfollow-upperiod5282-132monthsRESULTS:Overall9594100%Pvalue=08946AmongsttwofailedrepairsonesubsequentCONCLUSION:ThreefourthcanbasisstudypostulatepreferredaccessibleTrans-vaginalfistulae:worthyoption!Abdominal

Similar Articles

Cited By