Comparative evolutionary histories of kisspeptins and kisspeptin receptors in vertebrates reveal both parallel and divergent features.

Jérémy Pasquier, Anne-Gaëlle Lafont, Hervé Tostivint, Hubert Vaudry, Karine Rousseau, Sylvie Dufour
Author Information
  1. Jérémy Pasquier: Research Unit BOREA, Biology of Aquatic Organisms and Ecosystems, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 7208, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement 207, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris, France.

Abstract

During the past decade, the kisspeptin system has been identified in various vertebrates, leading to the discovery of multiple genes encoding both peptides (Kiss) and receptors (Kissr). The investigation of recently published genomes from species of phylogenetic interest, such as a chondrichthyan, the elephant shark, an early sarcopterygian, the coelacanth, a non-teleost actinopterygian, the spotted gar, and an early teleost, the European eel, allowed us to get new insights into the molecular diversity and evolution of both Kiss and Kissr families. We identified four Kissr in the spotted gar and coelacanth genomes, providing the first evidence of four Kissr genes in vertebrates. We also found three Kiss in the coelacanth and elephant shark genomes revealing two new species, in addition to Xenopus, presenting three Kiss genes. Considering the increasing diversity of kisspeptin system, phylogenetic, and synteny analyses enabled us to clarify both Kiss and Kissr classifications. We also could trace back the evolution of both gene families from the early steps of vertebrate history. Four Kissr and four Kiss paralogs may have arisen via the two whole genome duplication rounds (1R and 2R) in early vertebrates. This would have been followed by multiple independent Kiss and Kissr gene losses in the sarcopterygian and actinopterygian lineages. In particular, no impact of the teleost-specific 3R could be recorded on the numbers of teleost Kissr or Kiss paralogs. The origin of their diversity via 1R and 2R, as well as the subsequent occurrence of multiple gene losses, represent common features of the evolutionary histories of Kiss and Kissr families in vertebrates. In contrast, comparisons also revealed un-matching numbers of Kiss and Kissr genes in some species, as well as a large variability of Kiss/Kissr couples according to species. These discrepancies support independent features of the Kiss and Kissr evolutionary histories across vertebrate radiation.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Feb;11(2):166 [PMID: 20051987]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 23;349(17):1614-27 [PMID: 14573733]
  3. Endocrinology. 2009 Jun;150(6):2837-46 [PMID: 19164475]
  4. Biol Reprod. 2010 Feb;82(2):313-9 [PMID: 19828777]
  5. Endocrinology. 2009 Feb;150(2):821-31 [PMID: 18927220]
  6. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41850 [PMID: 22855693]
  7. J Endocrinol. 2012 Jul;214(1):79-85 [PMID: 22526494]
  8. Bioessays. 2005 Sep;27(9):937-45 [PMID: 16108068]
  9. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1992;15:57-85 [PMID: 1575450]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 18;108(42):17527-32 [PMID: 21987818]
  11. J Endocrinol. 2009 Jun;201(3):407-18 [PMID: 19304758]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 15;109(20):E1294-301 [PMID: 22505735]
  13. Biol Reprod. 2008 Oct;79(4):776-86 [PMID: 18509165]
  14. Physiol Rev. 2012 Jul;92(3):1235-316 [PMID: 22811428]
  15. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009 Nov 27;312(1-2):61-71 [PMID: 19084576]
  16. Front Neurosci. 2012 Jan 24;6:3 [PMID: 22291614]
  17. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003 Dec 26;312(4):1357-63 [PMID: 14652023]
  18. Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):714-9 [PMID: 17554307]
  19. Genome Res. 2007 Sep;17(9):1254-65 [PMID: 17652425]
  20. J Biol Chem. 2001 Sep 14;276(37):34631-6 [PMID: 11457843]
  21. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2012 Jan 15;175(2):234-43 [PMID: 22137912]
  22. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48931 [PMID: 23185286]
  23. Endocrinology. 2011 Apr;152(4):1527-40 [PMID: 21325050]
  24. Mol Pharmacol. 2009 Jul;76(1):58-67 [PMID: 19389922]
  25. Science. 1998 Nov 27;282(5394):1711-4 [PMID: 9831563]
  26. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32231 [PMID: 22384188]
  27. PLoS Biol. 2005 Oct;3(10):e314 [PMID: 16128622]
  28. Genetics. 2011 Aug;188(4):799-808 [PMID: 21828280]
  29. Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 15;26(8):1119-21 [PMID: 20185404]
  30. Biol Reprod. 2012 Jun 14;86(6):177 [PMID: 22423047]
  31. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011 Aug 1;173(1):216-25 [PMID: 21679713]
  32. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Feb;298(2):E296-303 [PMID: 19934405]
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):10972-6 [PMID: 12944565]
  34. J Biol Chem. 2001 Aug 3;276(31):28969-75 [PMID: 11387329]
  35. PLoS Biol. 2007 Apr;5(4):e101 [PMID: 17407382]
  36. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Dec 4;88(23):1731-7 [PMID: 8944003]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0KissKissrkisspeptinvertebratesgenesspeciesearlycoelacanthevolutionarymultiplegenomesspottedgardiversityfamiliesfouralsogenefeatureshistoriessystemidentifiedreceptorsphylogeneticelephantsharksarcopterygianactinopterygianteleostEuropeaneelusnewevolutionthreetwosyntenyvertebratehistoryparalogsvia1R2Rindependentlossesnumberswellpastdecadevariousleadingdiscoveryencodingpeptidesinvestigationrecentlypublishedinterestchondrichthyannon-teleostallowedgetinsightsmolecularprovidingfirstevidencefoundrevealingadditionXenopuspresentingConsideringincreasinganalysesenabledclarifyclassificationstracebackstepsFourmayarisenwholegenomeduplicationroundsfollowedlineagesparticularimpactteleost-specific3Rrecordedoriginsubsequentoccurrencerepresentcommoncontrastcomparisonsrevealedun-matchinglargevariabilityKiss/KissrcouplesaccordingdiscrepanciessupportacrossradiationComparativekisspeptinsrevealparalleldivergentreceptorphylogeny

Similar Articles

Cited By