Are neoclassical canons valid for southern Chinese faces?

Yasas S N Jayaratne, Curtis K Deutsch, Colman P J McGrath, Roger A Zwahlen
Author Information
  1. Yasas S N Jayaratne: Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proportions derived from neoclassical canons, initially described by Renaissance sculptors and painters, are still being employed as aesthetic guidelines during the clinical assessment of the facial morphology.
OBJECTIVE: 1. to determine the applicability of neoclassical canons for Southern Chinese faces and 2. to explore gender differences in relation to the applicability of the neoclassical canons and their variants.
METHODOLOGY: 3-D photographs acquired from 103 young adults (51 males and 52 females) without facial dysmorphology were used to test applicability of four neoclassical canons. Standard anthropometric measurements that determine the facial canons were made on these 3-D images. The validity of the canons as well as their different variants were quantified.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The neoclassical cannons seldom applied to these individuals, and facial three-section and orbital canons did not apply at all. The orbitonasal canon was most frequently applicable, with a frequency of 19%. Significant sexual dimorphism was found relative to the prevalence of the variants of facial three-section and orbitonasal canons.
CONCLUSION: The neoclassical canons did not appear to apply to our sample when rigorous quantitative measurements were employed. Thus, they should not be used as esthetic goals for craniofacial surgical interventions.

References

  1. Ann Plast Surg. 1999 Mar;42(3):280-8 [PMID: 10096619]
  2. Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Oct 15;138A(3):247-53 [PMID: 16158436]
  3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep;118(3):741-56 [PMID: 16932186]
  4. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011 Aug;145(4):599-614 [PMID: 21660932]
  5. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1997 Jul-Aug;21(4):265-9 [PMID: 9263550]
  6. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2009 Nov;292(11):1720-33 [PMID: 19718714]
  7. Dent Update. 2008 Apr;35(3):159-62, 164-6, 169-70 [PMID: 18507224]
  8. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;26(1):64-9 [PMID: 11891603]
  9. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985 Mar;75(3):328-38 [PMID: 3883374]
  10. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 May;45(3):232-9 [PMID: 18452351]
  11. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug;6(4):244-52 [PMID: 15262719]
  12. J Orthod. 2001 Jun;28(2):159-68 [PMID: 11395532]
  13. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2000 May-Jun;24(3):179-84 [PMID: 10890944]
  14. J Craniofac Surg. 2006 May;17(3):477-83 [PMID: 16770184]
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan;129(1):164e-165e [PMID: 22186534]
  16. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001 Jul-Sep;3(3):191-7 [PMID: 11497505]
  17. Ann Plast Surg. 1995 Mar;34(3):318-21; discussion 321-2 [PMID: 7598391]
  18. Dent Update. 2008 Mar;35(2):102-4, 106-7 [PMID: 18426163]
  19. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012 Oct;28(10):753-7 [PMID: 22394274]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Anthropometry
Asian People
Face
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Male
Sex Factors
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0canonsneoclassicalfacialapplicabilityvariantsemployeddetermineChinese3-Dusedmeasurementsthree-sectionapplyorbitonasalBACKGROUND:ProportionsderivedinitiallydescribedRenaissancesculptorspaintersstillaestheticguidelinesclinicalassessmentmorphologyOBJECTIVE:1Southernfaces2exploregenderdifferencesrelationMETHODOLOGY:photographsacquired103youngadults51males52femaleswithoutdysmorphologytestfourStandardanthropometricmadeimagesvaliditywelldifferentquantifiedPRINCIPALFINDINGS:cannonsseldomappliedindividualsorbitalcanonfrequentlyapplicablefrequency19%SignificantsexualdimorphismfoundrelativeprevalenceCONCLUSION:appearsamplerigorousquantitativeThusestheticgoalscraniofacialsurgicalinterventionsvalidsouthernfaces?

Similar Articles

Cited By