Presence of a polymicrobial endometrial biofilm in patients with bacterial vaginosis.

Alexander Swidsinski, Hans Verstraelen, Vera Loening-Baucke, Sonja Swidsinski, Werner Mendling, Zaher Halwani
Author Information
  1. Alexander Swidsinski: Charité Hospital, CCM, Laboratory for Molecular Genetics, Polymicrobial Infections and Bacterial Biofilms and Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the bacterial vaginosis biofilm extends into the upper female genital tract.
STUDY DESIGN: Endometrial samples obtained during curettage and fallopian tube samples obtained during salpingectomy were collected. Endometrial and fallopian tube samples were analyzed for the presence of bacteria with fluorescence-in-situ-hybridisation (FISH) analysis with probes targeting bacterial vaginosis-associated and other bacteria.
RESULTS: A structured polymicrobial Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm could be detected in part of the endometrial and fallopian tube specimens. Women with bacterial vaginosis had a 50.0% (95% CI 24.0-76.0) risk of presenting with an endometrial Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm. Pregnancy (AOR  = 41.5, 95% CI 5.0-341.9, p<0.001) and the presence of bacterial vaginosis (AOR  = 23.2, 95% CI 2.6-205.9, p<0.001) were highly predictive of the presence of uterine or fallopian bacterial colonisation when compared to non-pregnant women without bacterial vaginosis.
CONCLUSION: Bacterial vaginosis is frequently associated with the presence of a structured polymicrobial Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm attached to the endometrium. This may have major implications for our understanding of the pathogenesis of adverse pregnancy outcome in association with bacterial vaginosis.

References

  1. J Reprod Med. 1986 Jun;31(6):473-7 [PMID: 3735259]
  2. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995 Mar;74(3):216-9 [PMID: 7900526]
  3. Anaerobe. 2010 Oct;16(5):478-82 [PMID: 20620215]
  4. Res Microbiol. 2011 Jun;162(5):506-13 [PMID: 21513795]
  5. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009 Nov;7(9):1109-24 [PMID: 19883331]
  6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967 Oct 1;99(3):394-6 [PMID: 4962972]
  7. BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):714-7 [PMID: 12118653]
  8. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;70(4):256-63 [PMID: 21051845]
  9. BMC Microbiol. 2004 Apr 21;4:16 [PMID: 15102329]
  10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):630-7 [PMID: 16522390]
  11. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Feb;11(2):204-5 [PMID: 1396742]
  12. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1611-6 [PMID: 16769017]
  13. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;106(5 Pt 1):1013-23 [PMID: 16260520]
  14. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;191(4):1130-2 [PMID: 15507931]
  15. N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 3;353(18):1899-911 [PMID: 16267321]
  16. Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Feb;61(2):217-22 [PMID: 6337355]
  17. BMJ. 1999 Jul 24;319(7204):220-3 [PMID: 10417083]
  18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;196(3):226.e1-6 [PMID: 17346530]
  19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;198(1):97.e1-6 [PMID: 18005928]
  20. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Jun;21(3):375-90 [PMID: 17241817]
  21. BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1334 [PMID: 12468483]

MeSH Term

Biofilms
Endometrium
Fallopian Tubes
Female
Gardnerella vaginalis
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
Pregnancy Outcome
Vagina
Vaginosis, Bacterial

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bacterialvaginosisbiofilmfallopianpresencesamplestubepolymicrobialGardnerellavaginalisendometrial95%CIEndometrialobtainedbacteriastructuredAOR59p<00012OBJECTIVE:assesswhetherextendsupperfemalegenitaltractSTUDYDESIGN:curettagesalpingectomycollectedanalyzedfluorescence-in-situ-hybridisationFISHanalysisprobestargetingvaginosis-associatedRESULTS:detectedpartspecimensWomen500%240-760riskpresentingPregnancy = 410-341 = 236-205highlypredictiveuterinecolonisationcomparednon-pregnantwomenwithoutCONCLUSION:BacterialfrequentlyassociatedattachedendometriummaymajorimplicationsunderstandingpathogenesisadversepregnancyoutcomeassociationPresencepatients

Similar Articles

Cited By