Ethical aspects and dilemmas of preparing, writing and publishing of the scientific papers in the biomedical journals.

Izet Masic
Author Information
  1. Izet Masic: Academy of medical sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this paper author discussed about preparing and submitting manuscripts - scientific, research, professional papers, reviews and case reports. Author described it from the Editor's perspective, and specially talked about ethical aspects of authorship, conflict of interest, copyright, plagiarism and duplicate publication from the point of view of his experiences as Editor-in-Chief of several biomedical journals and Chief of Task Force of European Federation of Medical Informatics journals and member of Task Force of European Cardiology Society journals. The scientific process relies on trust and credibility. The scientific community demands high ethical standards to conduct biomedical research and to publish scientific contents. During the last decade, disclosure of conflicts of interest (COI ), (also called competing loyalties, competing interests or dual commitments), has been considered as a key element to guarantee the credibility of the scientific process. Biases in design, analysis and interpretation of studies may arise when authors or sponsors have vested interests. Therefore, COI should be made clear to the readers to facilitate their own judgment and interpretation of their relevance and potential implications.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Authors are responsible to fully disclose potential COI . In October 2009 the ICMJE proposed an electronic "uniform" format for COI disclosure. Four main areas were addressed: authors´ associations with entities that supported the submitted manuscript (indefinite time frame), associations with commercial entities with potential interest in the general area of the manuscript (time frame 36 months), financial association of their spouse and children and, finally, non-financial associations potentially relevant to the submitted manuscript. Consumers of medical scholarship expect a reliable system of disclosure in which journals and authors make disclosures appropriately and consistently. There is a stigma surrounding the reporting of COI that should be progressively overcome. Further actions are required to increase awareness of the importance of COI disclosure and to promote policies aimed to enhance transparency in biomedical research. In this article author discuss about important ethical dilemmas in preparing, writing and publishing of scientific manuscripts in biomedical journals.

Keywords

References

  1. Acta Inform Med. 2012 Mar;20(1):40-3 [PMID: 23322953]
  2. Croat Med J. 2011 Aug 15;52(4):576-7 [PMID: 21853553]
  3. Med Arch. 2012;66(4):220-1 [PMID: 22919873]
  4. Acta Inform Med. 2012 Mar;20(1):4 [PMID: 26085711]
  5. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;64(7):718-42 [PMID: 21216130]
  6. JAMA. 2009 Jul 8;302(2):198-9 [PMID: 19584352]
  7. Croat Med J. 2011 Jun;52(3):423-8 [PMID: 21674841]
  8. Acta Inform Med. 2011 Jun;19(2):68-79 [PMID: 23572850]
  9. Mater Sociomed. 2012;24(1):48-53 [PMID: 23922516]
  10. Acta Inform Med. 2009;17(4):180-2 [PMID: 24109161]
  11. Acta Inform Med. 2012 Jun;20(2):72-84 [PMID: 23322957]
  12. JAMA. 2009 Nov 25;302(20):2230-4 [PMID: 19934424]
  13. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1896-7 [PMID: 19825973]
  14. Acta Inform Med. 2011 Dec;19(4):196-202 [PMID: 23408513]
  15. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Dec;21(12):1248-52 [PMID: 17105524]
  16. Acta Inform Med. 2012 Jun;20(2):113-7 [PMID: 23322964]
  17. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Jul;2(3):130-2 [PMID: 23022829]
  18. Acta Inform Med. 2012 Sep;20(3):136-40 [PMID: 23322968]
  19. Med Arch. 2012;66(3):148-54 [PMID: 22822611]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0scientificjournalsbiomedicalCOIinterestdisclosurepreparingresearchethicalpotentialassociationsmanuscriptauthormanuscriptspapersaspectsauthorshipconflictcopyrightplagiarismduplicatepublicationTaskForceEuropeanprocesscredibilitycompetinginterestsinterpretationauthorsentitiessubmittedtimeframemedicaldilemmaswritingpublishingINTRODUCTION:paperdiscussedsubmitting-professionalreviewscasereportsAuthordescribedEditor'sperspectivespeciallytalkedpointviewexperiencesEditor-in-ChiefseveralChiefFederationMedicalInformaticsmemberCardiologySocietyreliestrustcommunitydemandshighstandardsconductpublishcontentslastdecadeconflictsalsocalledloyaltiesdualcommitmentsconsideredkeyelementguaranteeBiasesdesignanalysisstudiesmayarisesponsorsvestedThereforemadeclearreadersfacilitatejudgmentrelevanceimplicationsRESULTSANDDISCUSSION:AuthorsresponsiblefullydiscloseOctober2009ICMJEproposedelectronic"uniform"formatFourmainareasaddressed:authors´supportedindefinitecommercialgeneralarea36monthsfinancialassociationspousechildrenfinallynon-financialpotentiallyrelevantConsumersscholarshipexpectreliablesystemmakedisclosuresappropriatelyconsistentlystigmasurroundingreportingprogressivelyovercomeactionsrequiredincreaseawarenessimportancepromotepoliciesaimedenhancetransparencyarticlediscussimportantEthicalacknowledgementethicsscience

Similar Articles

Cited By