Gender and agreement processing in children with developmental language disorder.

Natalia Rakhlin, Sergey A Kornilov, Elena L Grigorenko
Author Information
  1. Natalia Rakhlin: Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  2. Sergey A Kornilov: Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  3. Elena L Grigorenko: Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Abstract

Two experiments tested whether Russian-speaking children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) are sensitive to gender agreement when performing a gender decision task. In Experiment 1, the presence of overt gender agreement between verbs and/or adjectival modifiers and postverbal subject nouns memory was varied. In Experiment 2, agreement violations were introduced and the targets varied between words, pseudo-words, or pseudo-words with derivational suffixes. In both experiments, children with DLD did not differ from typically developing children in their reaction time or sensitivity to agreement features. In both groups, trials with feminine gender resulted in a higher error rate. Children with DLD displayed lower overall accuracy, which was related to differences in phonological memory in both experiments. Furthermore, in Experiment 1 group differences were not maintained after phonological memory was entered as a covariate. The results are discussed with respect to various processing and linguistic theories of DLD.

References

  1. Nature. 1997 Jun 5;387(6633):547-8 [PMID: 9177332]
  2. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Dec;41(6):1432-43 [PMID: 9859896]
  3. Lingua. 2011 Feb;121(3):408-422 [PMID: 21318176]
  4. J Child Lang. 2007 Feb;34(1):111-31 [PMID: 17340940]
  5. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Jun 14;682:27-47 [PMID: 7686725]
  6. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):377-87 [PMID: 19603894]
  7. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1994 Aug;86(2-3):199-225 [PMID: 7976467]
  8. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Feb;50(1):177-95 [PMID: 17344558]
  9. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Feb;44(1):165-78 [PMID: 11218100]
  10. J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Aug;38(4):850-63 [PMID: 7474978]
  11. Brain Lang. 1984 Jan;21(1):9-20 [PMID: 6697172]
  12. J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Dec;39(6):1239-57 [PMID: 8959609]
  13. J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Apr;37(2):418-21 [PMID: 8028323]
  14. Brain Lang. 2001 Jun;77(3):432-48 [PMID: 11386708]
  15. J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446 [PMID: 19884961]
  16. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Aug;44(4):905-24 [PMID: 11521782]
  17. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Oct;42(5):1205-18 [PMID: 10515516]
  18. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Dec;41(6):1363-74 [PMID: 9859891]
  19. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Oct;43(5):1115-25 [PMID: 11063234]
  20. Neuropsychologia. 1998 Jan;36(1):37-43 [PMID: 9533385]
  21. Clin Linguist Phon. 2009 Jul;23(7):489-506 [PMID: 19585310]
  22. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Feb;40(1):62-74 [PMID: 9113859]
  23. J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Jun;38(3):589-98 [PMID: 7674653]
  24. Brain Lang. 1987 Nov;32(2):233-52 [PMID: 3690253]
  25. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1999;51(1-2):20-35 [PMID: 9973664]
  26. Cortex. 2005 Jun;41(3):399-433 [PMID: 15871604]

Grants

  1. P50 HD052120/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 DC007665/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Case-Control Studies
Child
Decision Making
Female
Humans
Language Development Disorders
Male
Phonetics
Semantics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0agreementchildrenDLDgenderexperimentsExperimentmemory1variedpseudo-wordsdifferencesphonologicalprocessingTwotestedwhetherRussian-speakingDevelopmentalLanguageDisordersensitiveperformingdecisiontaskpresenceovertverbsand/oradjectivalmodifierspostverbalsubjectnouns2violationsintroducedtargetswordsderivationalsuffixesdiffertypicallydevelopingreactiontimesensitivityfeaturesgroupstrialsfeminineresultedhighererrorrateChildrendisplayedloweroverallaccuracyrelatedFurthermoregroupmaintainedenteredcovariateresultsdiscussedrespectvariouslinguistictheoriesGenderdevelopmentallanguagedisorder

Similar Articles

Cited By