Genetic diversity of North American captive-born gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).

Noah D Simons, Ronald S Wagner, Joseph G Lorenz
Author Information
  1. Noah D Simons: Primate Behavior Program, Central Washington University Ellensburg, Washington.

Abstract

Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) are designated as critically endangered and wild populations are dramatically declining as a result of habitat destruction, fragmentation, diseases (e.g., Ebola) and the illegal bushmeat trade. As wild populations continue to decline, the genetic management of the North American captive western lowland gorilla population will be an important component of the long-term conservation of the species. We genotyped 26 individuals from the North American captive gorilla collection at 11 autosomal microsatellite loci in order to compare levels of genetic diversity to wild populations, investigate genetic signatures of a population bottleneck and identify the genetic structure of the captive-born population. Captive gorillas had significantly higher levels of allelic diversity (t(7) = 4.49, P = 0.002) and heterozygosity (t(7) = 4.15, P = 0.004) than comparative wild populations, yet the population has lost significant allelic diversity while in captivity when compared to founders (t(7) = 2.44, P = 0.04). Analyses suggested no genetic evidence for a population bottleneck of the captive population. Genetic structure results supported the management of North American captive gorillas as a single population. Our results highlight the utility of genetic management approaches for endangered nonhuman primate species.

Keywords

References

  1. Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9 [PMID: 22820204]
  2. Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20 [PMID: 15969739]
  3. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):103-6 [PMID: 21585727]
  4. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e19788 [PMID: 21687709]
  5. Mol Ecol. 2005 Apr;14(4):917-31 [PMID: 15773925]
  6. Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(5):1099-106 [PMID: 17305863]
  7. Am J Primatol. 2006 Jan;68(1):73-95 [PMID: 16419121]
  8. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59 [PMID: 10835412]
  9. Genetics. 2001 Oct;159(2):699-713 [PMID: 11606545]
  10. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000 Jan;111(1):25-44 [PMID: 10618587]
  11. Am J Primatol. 2008 Sep;70(9):848-59 [PMID: 18521886]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 28;102(26):9418-23 [PMID: 15964984]
  13. Mol Ecol. 2004 Nov;13(11):3389-402 [PMID: 15487998]
  14. Evolution. 1985 May;39(3):623-637 [PMID: 28561967]
  15. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008 Mar;135(3):263-74 [PMID: 18000886]
  16. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:725-38 [PMID: 14156929]
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3166-70 [PMID: 8159720]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 7;274(1622):2179-85 [PMID: 17609183]
  19. Primates. 2000 Apr;41(2):175-183 [PMID: 30545168]
  20. Curr Biol. 2004 Mar 23;14(6):510-3 [PMID: 15043817]
  21. Mol Ecol. 1995 Jun;4(3):347-54 [PMID: 7663752]
  22. Mol Ecol. 1998 May;7(5):639-55 [PMID: 9633105]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0gorillapopulationgenetic=populationsgorillaswildNorthAmericancaptivediversitymanagementt7P0lowlandGorillaendangeredconservationspeciesmicrosatellitelevelsbottleneckstructurecaptive-bornCaptiveallelic4GeneticresultsWesterndesignatedcriticallydramaticallydecliningresulthabitatdestructionfragmentationdiseasesegEbolaillegalbushmeattradecontinuedeclinewesternwillimportantcomponentlong-termgenotyped26individualscollection11autosomallociordercompareinvestigatesignaturesidentifysignificantlyhigher49002heterozygosity15004comparativeyetlostsignificantcaptivitycomparedfounders24404Analysessuggestedevidencesupportedsinglehighlightutilityapproachesnonhumanprimategenetics

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)