Association between ultrasound measurements of muscle thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity and skeletal muscle strength in the elderly.

Eva Maria Strasser, Thomas Draskovits, Markus Praschak, Michael Quittan, Alexandra Graf
Author Information
  1. Eva Maria Strasser: Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Social Medical Centre South, Kaiser Franz Joseph Hospital, Kundratstrasse 3, 1100, Vienna, Austria, eva-maria.strasser@wienkav.at.

Abstract

The increase of elderly in our society requires simple tools for quantification of sarcopenia in inpatient and outpatient settings. The aim of this study was to compare parameters determined with musculoskeletal ultrasound (M-US) with muscle strength in young and elderly patients. In this prospective, randomised and observer blind study, 26 young (24.2 ± 3.7 years) and 26 old (age 67.8 ± 4.8 years) patients were included. Muscle thickness, pennation angle and echogenicity of all muscles of musculus quadriceps were measured by M-US and correlated with isometric maximum voluntary contraction force (MVC) of musculus quadriceps. Reproducibility of M-US measurements as well as simple and multiple regression models were calculated. Of all measured M-US variables the highest reproducibility was found for measurements of thickness (intraclass correlation coefficients, 85-97%). Simple regression analysis showed a highly significant correlation of thickness measurements of all muscles of musculus quadriceps with MVC in the elderly and in the young. Multiple regression analysis revealed that thickness of musculus vastus medialis had the best correlation with MVC in the elderly. This study showed that measurement of muscle thickness, especially of musculus vastus medialis, by M-US is a reliable, bedside method for monitoring the extent of sarcopenia.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT00933192

References

  1. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Mar;35(3):443-6 [PMID: 19081667]
  2. J Gravit Physiol. 1997 Jan;4(1):S10-4 [PMID: 11541170]
  3. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Feb;85(2):377-84 [PMID: 17284732]
  4. Age (Dordr). 2013 Jun;35(3):891-903 [PMID: 22453934]
  5. Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):412-23 [PMID: 20392703]
  6. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65(5):433-7 [PMID: 1425649]
  7. Int Z Angew Physiol. 1968;26(1):26-32 [PMID: 5700894]
  8. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Apr;112(4):1519-25 [PMID: 21847576]
  9. J Neurol Sci. 1998 Jul 15;159(1):60-6 [PMID: 9700705]
  10. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Aug;172(4):249-55 [PMID: 11531646]
  11. BMJ. 2010 Sep 09;341:c4467 [PMID: 20829298]
  12. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;59(4):310-9 [PMID: 2583179]
  13. J Anat. 2006 Sep;209(3):289-310 [PMID: 16928199]
  14. J Biomech. 2006;39(3):406-17 [PMID: 16389081]
  15. Exp Gerontol. 2012 Jun;47(6):473-8 [PMID: 22525196]
  16. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Nov;95(5):1851-60 [PMID: 14555665]
  17. J Physiol. 1983 May;338:37-49 [PMID: 6875963]
  18. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Sep;99(3):1050-5 [PMID: 15905324]
  19. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Mar;40(3):185-9 [PMID: 18292919]
  20. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2009 Nov;29(6):440-6 [PMID: 19747211]
  21. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Nov;77(11):1173-8 [PMID: 8931531]
  22. J Rehabil Med. 2001 Jan;33(1):36-41 [PMID: 11480468]
  23. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Jul;89(1):81-8 [PMID: 10904038]
  24. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Oct;95(4):1717-27 [PMID: 12970377]
  25. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 May;56(5):B209-17 [PMID: 11320101]
  26. JAMA. 1999 Feb 10;281(6):558-60 [PMID: 10022113]
  27. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003 Feb;29(2):215-25 [PMID: 12659909]
  28. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Jun;74(6):2740-4 [PMID: 8365975]
  29. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006 Sep;32(9):1315-21 [PMID: 16965971]
  30. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1983;50(3):309-18 [PMID: 6683155]
  31. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Apr;41(4):844-56 [PMID: 19276848]
  32. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Mar;55(3):M168-73 [PMID: 10795731]
  33. Neuromuscul Disord. 1995 Sep;5(5):415-22 [PMID: 7496175]
  34. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):683-93 [PMID: 12594312]
  35. Clin Physiol. 1985 Apr;5(2):145-54 [PMID: 3888498]
  36. Age Ageing. 2010 May;39(3):331-7 [PMID: 20219767]
  37. Thorax. 2009 May;64(5):418-23 [PMID: 19158125]
  38. Public Health Nutr. 2006 Sep;9(6):755-62 [PMID: 16925881]
  39. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Apr;88(4):1321-6 [PMID: 10749826]
  40. J Ultrasound Med. 1993 Feb;12(2):73-7 [PMID: 8468739]
  41. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Mar;55(3):B152-7; discussion B158-9 [PMID: 10795719]
  42. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Jan;86(3):203-8 [PMID: 11990727]
  43. Muscle Nerve. 2010 Jan;41(1):32-41 [PMID: 19722256]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Body Mass Index
Electromyography
Female
Humans
Isometric Contraction
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Strength
Prospective Studies
Quadriceps Muscle
Reproducibility of Results
Sarcopenia
Single-Blind Method
Ultrasonography
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0thicknesselderlyM-USmusculusmusclemeasurementsstudyyoungquadricepsMVCregressioncorrelationsimplesarcopeniaultrasoundstrengthpatients26±years8pennationangleechogenicitymusclesmeasuredanalysisshowedvastusmedialisincreasesocietyrequirestoolsquantificationinpatientoutpatientsettingsaimcompareparametersdeterminedmusculoskeletalprospectiverandomisedobserverblind24237oldage674includedMusclecorrelatedisometricmaximumvoluntarycontractionforceReproducibilitywellmultiplemodelscalculatedvariableshighestreproducibilityfoundintraclasscoefficients85-97%SimplehighlysignificantMultiplerevealedbestmeasurementespeciallyreliablebedsidemethodmonitoringextentAssociationskeletal

Similar Articles

Cited By