Emotion perception across cultures: the role of cognitive mechanisms.

Jan B Engelmann, Marianna Pogosyan
Author Information
  1. Jan B Engelmann: Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research, Department of Economics, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.

Abstract

Despite consistently documented cultural differences in the perception of facial expressions of emotion, the role of culture in shaping cognitive mechanisms that are central to emotion perception has received relatively little attention in past research. We review recent developments in cross-cultural psychology that provide particular insights into the modulatory role of culture on cognitive mechanisms involved in interpretations of facial expressions of emotion through two distinct routes: display rules and cognitive styles. Investigations of emotion intensity perception have demonstrated that facial expressions with varying levels of intensity of positive affect are perceived and categorized differently across cultures. Specifically, recent findings indicating significant levels of differentiation between intensity levels of facial expressions among American participants, as well as deviations from clear categorization of high and low intensity expressions among Japanese and Russian participants, suggest that display rules shape mental representations of emotions, such as intensity levels of emotion prototypes. Furthermore, a series of recent studies using eye tracking as a proxy for overt attention during face perception have identified culture-specific cognitive styles, such as the propensity to attend to very specific features of the face. Together, these results suggest a cascade of cultural influences on cognitive mechanisms involved in interpretations of facial expressions of emotion, whereby cultures impart specific behavioral practices that shape the way individuals process information from the environment. These cultural influences lead to differences in cognitive styles due to culture-specific attentional biases and emotion prototypes, which partially account for the gradient of cultural agreements and disagreements obtained in past investigations of emotion perception.

Keywords

References

  1. Nature. 2004 Jan 22;427(6972):311-2 [PMID: 14737157]
  2. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Dec;20(12):2167-74 [PMID: 18457504]
  3. Emotion. 2005 Mar;5(1):23-40 [PMID: 15755217]
  4. Brain Res. 2006 Jun 13;1094(1):179-91 [PMID: 16712816]
  5. Prog Brain Res. 2013;202:215-37 [PMID: 23317835]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 30;102(35):12629-33 [PMID: 16116075]
  7. Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;18(12):1084-9 [PMID: 18031416]
  8. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1999 Dec;53(6):629-33 [PMID: 10687742]
  9. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Oct;53(4):712-7 [PMID: 3681648]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):11163-70 [PMID: 12960375]
  11. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3416-29 [PMID: 20619280]
  12. J Neurosci. 2008 Jul 9;28(28):7031-5 [PMID: 18614670]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):847-52 [PMID: 9448250]
  14. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;5(4):391-400 [PMID: 22866061]
  15. BMC Neurosci. 2012 May 29;13:54 [PMID: 22642400]
  16. Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 29;19(18):1543-8 [PMID: 19682907]
  17. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jul;11(7):843-50 [PMID: 18552843]
  18. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):223-233 [PMID: 10827445]
  19. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:514-7 [PMID: 14681175]
  20. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):340-8 [PMID: 20019073]
  21. Emotion. 2006 Feb;6(1):125-38 [PMID: 16637756]
  22. Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1814-29 [PMID: 18062556]
  23. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Aug;11(8):327-32 [PMID: 17625952]
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 11;103(28):10775-80 [PMID: 16815966]
  25. Science. 1977 Oct 7;198(4312):75-8 [PMID: 17741897]
  26. Emotion. 2010 Dec;10(6):874-93 [PMID: 21171759]
  27. Neuroimage. 2007 Feb 1;34(3):1310-6 [PMID: 17134915]
  28. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jan;78(1):173-86 [PMID: 10653513]
  29. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Mar 30;3:4 [PMID: 19434242]
  30. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):491-500 [PMID: 12689375]
  31. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7241-4 [PMID: 22509011]
  32. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001 Apr;11(2):231-9 [PMID: 11301245]
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 11;97(8):4398-403 [PMID: 10716738]
  34. PLoS One. 2008 Aug 20;3(8):e3022 [PMID: 18714387]
  35. Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(4):294-307 [PMID: 19479638]
  36. Biol Psychol. 2009 Sep;82(1):70-81 [PMID: 19540302]
  37. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:335-59 [PMID: 22994921]
  38. Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):291-310 [PMID: 11381831]
  39. Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar 4;30(2):381-99 [PMID: 21702819]
  40. Psychol Sci. 2003 May;14(3):201-6 [PMID: 12741741]
  41. Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 1;40(2):415-419 [PMID: 18063389]
  42. Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 07;2:313 [PMID: 22084635]
  43. Emotion. 2007 Feb;7(1):131-146 [PMID: 17352569]
  44. Int J Psychol. 2011 Dec;46(6):401-35 [PMID: 22126090]
  45. Psychol Rev. 1999 Oct;106(4):766-794 [PMID: 10560328]
  46. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1971 Feb;17(2):124-9 [PMID: 5542557]
  47. Dev Sci. 2005 Nov;8(6):F31-6 [PMID: 16246233]
  48. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:329-49 [PMID: 12415074]
  49. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:315-41 [PMID: 10845067]
  50. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Aug;3(8):759-63 [PMID: 10903567]
  51. Cognition. 1991 Aug;40(1-2):1-19 [PMID: 1786670]
  52. Science. 1969 Apr 4;164(3875):86-8 [PMID: 5773719]
  53. Neuroreport. 2005 Feb 8;16(2):133-6 [PMID: 15671862]
  54. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Mar;94(3):365-81 [PMID: 18284287]
  55. Psychol Sci. 2003 Jul;14(4):373-6 [PMID: 12807413]
  56. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):19-25 [PMID: 21517206]
  57. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jan 1;51(1):59-67 [PMID: 11801231]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0emotioncognitiveperceptionexpressionsfacialintensityculturalmechanismslevelsrolecultureattentionrecentdisplayrulesstylesdifferencespastinvolvedinterpretationsacrossculturesamongparticipantssuggestshapeprototypesfaceculture-specificspecificinfluencesDespiteconsistentlydocumentedshapingcentralreceivedrelativelylittleresearchreviewdevelopmentscross-culturalpsychologyprovideparticularinsightsmodulatorytwodistinctroutes:InvestigationsdemonstratedvaryingpositiveaffectperceivedcategorizeddifferentlySpecificallyfindingsindicatingsignificantdifferentiationAmericanwelldeviationsclearcategorizationhighlowJapaneseRussianmentalrepresentationsemotionsFurthermoreseriesstudiesusingeyetrackingproxyovertidentifiedpropensityattendfeaturesTogetherresultscascadewherebyimpartbehavioralpracticeswayindividualsprocessinformationenvironmentleaddueattentionalbiasespartiallyaccountgradientagreementsdisagreementsobtainedinvestigationsEmotioncultures:amygdala

Similar Articles

Cited By