The effects of differential outcomes and different types of consequential stimuli on 7-year-old children's discriminative learning and memory.

Lourdes Martínez, Pilar Flores, Carmen González-Salinas, Luis J Fuentes, Angeles F Estévez
Author Information
  1. Lourdes Martínez: Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Almería, 04120, Almería, Spain.

Abstract

Researchers have demonstrated that discriminative learning is facilitated when a particular outcome is associated with each relation to be learned. Our primary purpose in the two experiments reported here was to assess whether the differential outcomes procedure (DOP) would enhance 7-year-old children's learning of symbolic discriminations using three different forms of consequences in which (1) reinforcers are given when correct choices are made ("+"), (2) reinforcers are withdrawn when errors are made ("-"), or (3) children receive a reinforcer following a correct choice and lose one following an incorrect choice ("+/-"), as well as different types of reinforcers (secondary and primary reinforcers, Experiment 1; primary reinforcers alone, Experiment 2). Participants learned the task faster and showed significantly better performance whenever differential outcomes were arranged independently of (1) the way of providing consequences (+, -, or +/-) and (2) the type of reinforcers being used. Interestingly, as in a previous study with 5-year-old children (Martínez, Estévez, Fuentes, & Overmier, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62(8):1617-1630, 2009), the use of the DOP also enhanced long-term persistence of learning.

References

  1. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2005 Nov;84(3):184-91 [PMID: 16087366]
  2. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Jun;21(3):503-10 [PMID: 19243662]
  3. Behav Brain Res. 2002 Oct 17;136(1):217-26 [PMID: 12385808]
  4. Dev Psychobiol. 1999 Dec;35(4):318-27 [PMID: 10573571]
  5. Am J Ment Retard. 1997 Jan;101(4):374-86 [PMID: 9017084]
  6. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Apr;60(4):571-80 [PMID: 17455067]
  7. Anim Learn Behav. 1976 May;4(2):121-4 [PMID: 964435]
  8. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1617-30 [PMID: 19214832]
  9. Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):76-84 [PMID: 22093651]
  10. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Oct;55:856-9 [PMID: 13988460]
  11. Am J Ment Retard. 2003 Mar;108(2):108-16 [PMID: 12564943]
  12. Learn Behav. 2005 Feb;33(1):1-21 [PMID: 15971490]
  13. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Mar;139(3):391-6 [PMID: 22321451]
  14. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jan;136(1):129-36 [PMID: 21146806]
  15. Child Dev. 1964 Jun;35:587-92 [PMID: 14163563]
  16. Behav Brain Res. 2004 Sep 23;154(1):165-9 [PMID: 15302122]
  17. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Mar 2;198(1):1-12 [PMID: 19022299]
  18. Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 2001 Jul-Sep;36(3):182-95 [PMID: 11777014]
  19. J Appl Behav Anal. 2004 Fall;37(3):411-5 [PMID: 15529899]
  20. Brain Res. 2009 Apr 10;1265:111-27 [PMID: 19401182]
  21. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Mar;18(3):430-43 [PMID: 16513007]
  22. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Feb;39(2):290-8 [PMID: 18787937]
  23. Phys Life Rev. 2009 Jun;6(2):103-20 [PMID: 20161073]
  24. Neuropsychology. 2012 Jul;26(4):483-9 [PMID: 22545618]

MeSH Term

Child
Choice Behavior
Discrimination Learning
Female
Humans
Male
Memory
Photic Stimulation
Reinforcement, Psychology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0reinforcerslearningprimarydifferentialoutcomesdifferent12discriminativelearnedDOP7-year-oldchildren'sconsequencescorrectmadechildrenfollowingchoicetypesExperimentResearchersdemonstratedfacilitatedparticularoutcomeassociatedrelationpurposetwoexperimentsreportedassesswhetherprocedureenhancesymbolicdiscriminationsusingthreeformsgivenchoices"+"withdrawnerrors"-"3receivereinforcerloseoneincorrect"+/-"wellsecondaryaloneParticipantstaskfastershowedsignificantlybetterperformancewheneverarrangedindependentlywayproviding+-+/-typeusedInterestinglypreviousstudy5-year-oldMartínezEstévezFuentes&OvermierQuarterlyJournalExperimentalPsychology628:1617-16302009usealsoenhancedlong-termpersistenceeffectsconsequentialstimulimemory

Similar Articles

Cited By