Effects of thrust amplitude and duration of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation on lumbar muscle spindle responses to vertebral position and movement.

Dong-Yuan Cao, William R Reed, Cynthia R Long, Gregory N Kawchuk, Joel G Pickar
Author Information
  1. Dong-Yuan Cao: Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA 52803, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mechanical characteristics of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulations (HVLA-SMs) can vary. Sustained changes in peripheral neuronal signaling due to altered load transmission to a sensory receptor's local mechanical environment are often considered a mechanism contributing to the therapeutic effects of spinal manipulation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether variation in an HVLA-SM's thrust amplitude and duration alters the neural responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to either vertebral movement or position.
METHODS: Anesthetized cats (n = 112) received L6 HVLA-SMs delivered to the spinous process. Cats were divided into 6 cohorts depending upon the peak thrust force (25%, 55%, 85% body weight) or thrust displacement (1, 2, 3 mm) they received. Cats in each cohort received 8 thrust durations (0-250 milliseconds). Afferent discharge from 112 spindles was recorded in response to ramp and hold vertebral movement before and after the manipulation. Changes in mean instantaneous frequency (∆MIF) during the baseline period preceding the ramps (∆MIFresting), during ramp movement (∆MIFmovement), and with the vertebra held in the new position (∆MIFposition) were compared.
RESULTS: Thrust duration had a small but statistically significant effect on ∆MIFresting at all 6 thrust amplitudes compared with control (0-millisecond thrust duration). The lowest amplitude thrust displacement (1 mm) increased ∆MIFresting at all thrust durations. For all the other thrust displacements and forces, the direction of change in ∆MIFresting was not consistent, and the pattern of change was not systematically related to thrust duration. Regardless of thrust force, displacement, or duration, ∆MIFmovement and ∆MIFposition were not significantly different from control.
CONCLUSION: Relatively low-amplitude thrust displacements applied during an HVLA-SM produced sustained increases in the resting discharge of paraspinal muscle spindles regardless of the duration over which the thrust was applied. However, regardless of the HVLA-SM's thrust amplitude or duration, the responsiveness of paraspinal muscle spindles to vertebral movement and to a new vertebral position was not affected.

References

  1. J Physiol. 1967 Oct;192(3):773-800 [PMID: 4293790]
  2. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(2):104P-105P [PMID: 4236905]
  3. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 May;23(4):258-75 [PMID: 10820299]
  4. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Oct 1;26(19):2105-10; discussion 2110-1 [PMID: 11698887]
  5. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):531-8 [PMID: 19027342]
  6. Spine J. 2002 Sep-Oct;2(5):357-71 [PMID: 14589467]
  7. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1993 Jul;8(4):210-4 [PMID: 23915971]
  8. Spine J. 2011 May;11(5):440-6 [PMID: 21463970]
  9. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Jan;24(1):2-11 [PMID: 11174689]
  10. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Oct;13(8):448-53 [PMID: 2146356]
  11. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 1;29(19):E413-25 [PMID: 15454722]
  12. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Oct;33(8):585-93 [PMID: 21036280]
  13. J Neurosci Methods. 1999 Jul 15;89(2):87-96 [PMID: 10491938]
  14. J Neurophysiol. 2003 Sep;90(3):1949-55 [PMID: 12724363]
  15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 1;30(1):115-22 [PMID: 15626991]
  16. J Physiol. 2007 Apr 15;580(Pt. 2):659-75 [PMID: 17255163]
  17. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Jul;35(6):437-45 [PMID: 22902139]
  18. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1982;5:171-87 [PMID: 6462095]
  19. Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):650-9 [PMID: 16291107]
  20. Spine J. 2001 Mar-Apr;1(2):121-30 [PMID: 14588392]
  21. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Jul-Aug;25(6):353-61 [PMID: 12183693]
  22. Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):583-95 [PMID: 17905321]
  23. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21):1772-81 [PMID: 21358568]
  24. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jul;18(9):1206-12 [PMID: 8362328]
  25. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:492039 [PMID: 23401713]
  26. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Sep 1;22(17):1955-64 [PMID: 9306523]
  27. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1997 Oct;34(4):394-404 [PMID: 9323643]
  28. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Oct;(179):62-70 [PMID: 6225597]
  29. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002 May;17(4):297-303 [PMID: 12034123]
  30. Man Ther. 2012 Dec;17(6):577-83 [PMID: 22809745]
  31. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 15;26(24):2692-700 [PMID: 11740357]
  32. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(3):723-43 [PMID: 4237132]
  33. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jan;29(1):22-31 [PMID: 16396726]
  34. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):670-91 [PMID: 22534288]
  35. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Nov-Dec;26(9):549-56 [PMID: 14673404]
  36. J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):1722-9 [PMID: 19164108]

Grants

  1. U19 AT004137/NCCIH NIH HHS
  2. C06 RR015433/NCRR NIH HHS
  3. R01 NS046818/NINDS NIH HHS
  4. C06 RR15433/NCRR NIH HHS
  5. K01 AT005935/NCCIH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cats
Female
Male
Manipulation, Spinal
Movement
Muscle Spindles
Physical Phenomena
Posture
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0thrustdurationvertebralmovementamplitudemusclespindlesposition∆MIFrestinglow-amplitudespinalmanipulationreceiveddisplacementhigh-velocityHVLA-SMsHVLA-SM'sresponsivenesslumbar112Cats6force1mmdurationsdischargeramp∆MIFmovementnew∆MIFpositioncomparedcontroldisplacementschangeappliedparaspinalregardlessOBJECTIVE:MechanicalcharacteristicsmanipulationscanvarySustainedchangesperipheralneuronalsignalingduealteredloadtransmissionsensoryreceptor'slocalmechanicalenvironmentoftenconsideredmechanismcontributingtherapeuticeffectspurposestudydeterminewhethervariationaltersneuraleitherMETHODS:Anesthetizedcatsn=L6deliveredspinousprocessdividedcohortsdependinguponpeak25%55%85%bodyweight23cohort80-250millisecondsAfferentrecordedresponseholdChangesmeaninstantaneousfrequency∆MIFbaselineperiodprecedingrampsvertebraheldRESULTS:Thrustsmallstatisticallysignificanteffectamplitudes0-millisecondlowestincreasedforcesdirectionconsistentpatternsystematicallyrelatedRegardlesssignificantlydifferentCONCLUSION:RelativelyHVLA-SMproducedsustainedincreasesrestingHoweveraffectedEffectsspindleresponses

Similar Articles

Cited By