A plant's perspective of extremes: terrestrial plant responses to changing climatic variability.

Christopher P O Reyer, Sebastian Leuzinger, Anja Rammig, Annett Wolf, Ruud P Bartholomeus, Antonello Bonfante, Francesca de Lorenzi, Marie Dury, Philipp Gloning, Renée Abou Jaoudé, Tamir Klein, Thomas M Kuster, Monica Martins, Georg Niedrist, Maria Riccardi, Georg Wohlfahrt, Paolo de Angelis, Giovanbattista de Dato, Louis François, Annette Menzel, Marízia Pereira
Author Information
  1. Christopher P O Reyer: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegrafenberg, PO Box 601203, Potsdam, 14412, Germany. reyer@pik-potsdam.de

Abstract

We review observational, experimental, and model results on how plants respond to extreme climatic conditions induced by changing climatic variability. Distinguishing between impacts of changing mean climatic conditions and changing climatic variability on terrestrial ecosystems is generally underrated in current studies. The goals of our review are thus (1) to identify plant processes that are vulnerable to changes in the variability of climatic variables rather than to changes in their mean, and (2) to depict/evaluate available study designs to quantify responses of plants to changing climatic variability. We find that phenology is largely affected by changing mean climate but also that impacts of climatic variability are much less studied, although potentially damaging. We note that plant water relations seem to be very vulnerable to extremes driven by changes in temperature and precipitation and that heat-waves and flooding have stronger impacts on physiological processes than changing mean climate. Moreover, interacting phenological and physiological processes are likely to further complicate plant responses to changing climatic variability. Phenological and physiological processes and their interactions culminate in even more sophisticated responses to changing mean climate and climatic variability at the species and community level. Generally, observational studies are well suited to study plant responses to changing mean climate, but less suitable to gain a mechanistic understanding of plant responses to climatic variability. Experiments seem best suited to simulate extreme events. In models, temporal resolution and model structure are crucial to capture plant responses to changing climatic variability. We highlight that a combination of experimental, observational, and/or modeling studies have the potential to overcome important caveats of the respective individual approaches.

References

  1. Oecologia. 2009 Aug;161(1):187-98 [PMID: 19449036]
  2. Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95 [PMID: 11919621]
  3. Nature. 2010 Oct 21;467(7318):959-62 [PMID: 20962844]
  4. Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):37-42 [PMID: 12511946]
  5. New Phytol. 2011 Feb;189(3):806-817 [PMID: 21054412]
  6. Science. 2002 Dec 13;298(5601):2202-5 [PMID: 12481139]
  7. Sci Total Environ. 2008 Oct 15;404(2-3):222-35 [PMID: 18675444]
  8. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Jan;15 Suppl 1:138-47 [PMID: 22288508]
  9. Nature. 2006 Sep 14;443(7108):205-9 [PMID: 16971947]
  10. Agric For Meteorol. 2011 Dec 15;151(12):1731-1740 [PMID: 24465071]
  11. Plant Physiol. 1951 Oct;26(4):722-36 [PMID: 16654407]
  12. Trends Biotechnol. 2011 Jan;29(1):9-17 [PMID: 20970211]
  13. Oecologia. 2004 Jun;140(1):11-25 [PMID: 15156395]
  14. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Jul;11(7):290-5 [PMID: 21237846]
  15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 19;105(33):11823-6 [PMID: 18697941]
  16. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Jan;15 Suppl 1:109-17 [PMID: 22612790]
  17. C R Biol. 2010 Aug;333(8):622-30 [PMID: 20688283]
  18. Nature. 2012 May 02;485(7399):494-7 [PMID: 22622576]
  19. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 May;26(5):236-41 [PMID: 21444122]
  20. Science. 2010 Mar 19;327(5972):1461-2 [PMID: 20299580]
  21. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2012 Jan;14(1):142-8 [PMID: 21974742]
  22. New Phytol. 2011 Dec;192(4):800-803 [PMID: 22074338]
  23. Ecol Lett. 2012 Aug;15(8):899-911 [PMID: 22553898]
  24. New Phytol. 2011 Sep;191(4):926-941 [PMID: 21762163]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 1;108(44):17905-9 [PMID: 22025683]
  26. New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(2):274-81 [PMID: 20409184]
  27. Nature. 2004 Jan 22;427(6972):332-6 [PMID: 14716318]
  28. Tree Physiol. 2005 Jun;25(6):641-50 [PMID: 15805084]
  29. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 May 1;1465(1-2):140-51 [PMID: 10748251]
  30. Am Nat. 2004 Sep;164(3):350-63 [PMID: 15478090]
  31. Ecol Lett. 2009 Oct;12(10):1040-9 [PMID: 19682007]
  32. Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):57-60 [PMID: 12511952]
  33. New Phytol. 2008;178(4):719-739 [PMID: 18422905]
  34. Int J Biometeorol. 2011 Nov;55(6):921-32 [PMID: 21755278]
  35. AoB Plants. 2010;2010:plq003 [PMID: 22476061]
  36. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106 Suppl 2:19723-8 [PMID: 19897732]
  37. J Plant Physiol. 2004 Nov;161(11):1189-202 [PMID: 15602811]
  38. New Phytol. 2011 Jul;191(1):15-18 [PMID: 21631506]
  39. New Phytol. 2001 Mar;149(3):369-399 [PMID: 33873342]
  40. Nature. 2005 Sep 22;437(7058):529-33 [PMID: 16177786]
  41. New Phytol. 2011 Dec;192(4):797-800 [PMID: 22074337]
  42. Environ Pollut. 2010 Aug;158(8):2527-32 [PMID: 20570421]
  43. New Phytol. 2008;179(4):964-974 [PMID: 18482227]
  44. Am Nat. 2004 Nov;164(5):625-32 [PMID: 15540152]
  45. Science. 2008 Jun 27;320(5884):1768-71 [PMID: 18583610]
  46. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 28;109(9):3401-5 [PMID: 22331914]
  47. Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Jul;34(7):1207-22 [PMID: 21410715]
  48. Science. 2011 Apr 8;332(6026):220-4 [PMID: 21415316]
  49. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 8;95(25):14839-42 [PMID: 9843976]
  50. Conserv Biol. 2006 Oct;20(5):1477-86 [PMID: 17002765]
  51. Planta. 2011 Jun;233(6):1087-96 [PMID: 21293876]
  52. Nature. 2010 Jul 1;466(7302):96-9 [PMID: 20596018]
  53. BMC Ecol. 2007 Dec 19;7:15 [PMID: 18093288]

Grants

  1. P 17560/Austrian Science Fund FWF
  2. P 19849/Austrian Science Fund FWF
  3. P 23267/Austrian Science Fund FWF

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Physiological
Climate
Plant Physiological Phenomena

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0climaticchangingvariabilityplantresponsesmeanprocessesclimateobservationalimpactsstudieschangesphysiologicalreviewexperimentalmodelplantsextremeconditionsterrestrialvulnerablestudylessseemsuitedresultsrespondinducedDistinguishingecosystemsgenerallyunderratedcurrentgoalsthus1identifyvariablesrather2depict/evaluateavailabledesignsquantifyfindphenologylargelyaffectedalsomuchstudiedalthoughpotentiallydamagingnotewaterrelationsextremesdriventemperatureprecipitationheat-wavesfloodingstrongerMoreoverinteractingphenologicallikelycomplicatePhenologicalinteractionsculminateevensophisticatedspeciescommunitylevelGenerallywellsuitablegainmechanisticunderstandingExperimentsbestsimulateeventsmodelstemporalresolutionstructurecrucialcapturehighlightcombinationand/ormodelingpotentialovercomeimportantcaveatsrespectiveindividualapproachesplant'sperspectiveextremes:

Similar Articles

Cited By