Some Factors Modulating the Strength of Resurgence After Extinction of an Instrumental Behavior.

Neil E Winterbauer, Sara Lucke, Mark E Bouton
Author Information
  1. Neil E Winterbauer: University of Vermont.

Abstract

In resurgence, an operant behavior that has undergone extinction can return ("resurge") when a second operant that has replaced it itself undergoes extinction. The phenomenon may provide insight into relapse that may occur after incentive or contingency management therapies in humans. Three experiments with rats examined the impact of several variables on the strength of the resurgence effect. In each, pressing one lever (L1) was first reinforced and then extinguished while pressing a second, alternative, lever (L2) was now reinforced. When L2 responding was then itself extinguished, L1 responses resurged. Experiment 1 found that resurgence was especially strong after an extensive amount of L1 training (12 as opposed to 4 training sessions) and after L1 was reinforced on a random ratio schedule as opposed to a variable interval schedule that was matched on reinforcement rate. Experiment 2 found that after 12 initial sessions of L1 training, 4, 12, or 36 sessions of Phase 2 each allowed substantial (and apparently equivalent) resurgence. Experiment 3 found no effect of changing the identity of the reinforcer (from grain pellet to sucrose pellet or sucrose to grain) on the amount of resurgence. The results suggest that resurgence can be robust; in the natural world, an operant behavior with an extensive reinforcement history may still resurge after extensive incentive-based therapy. The results are discussed in terms of current explanations of the resurgence effect.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Apr;27(2):99-114 [PMID: 11296492]
  2. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:431-61 [PMID: 14744222]
  3. Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Jun;17(4):369-74 [PMID: 16914956]
  4. Learn Mem. 2004 Sep-Oct;11(5):485-94 [PMID: 15466298]
  5. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Apr;36(5):1015-20 [PMID: 21228769]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Sep;80(2):217-33 [PMID: 14674730]
  7. Learn Behav. 2011 Mar;39(1):57-67 [PMID: 21279496]
  8. Learn Motiv. 2011 May 1;42(2):154-164 [PMID: 21479120]
  9. Science. 1970 Jul 17;169(3942):301-3 [PMID: 5450360]
  10. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1993 Feb;46(1):63-95 [PMID: 8456178]
  11. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):156-81 [PMID: 24203468]
  12. Learn Behav. 2009 Nov;37(4):357-64 [PMID: 19815932]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jan;95(1):91-108 [PMID: 21541118]
  14. Learn Behav. 2012 Jun;40(2):145-57 [PMID: 22002545]
  15. Br J Psychol. 1958 Aug;49(3):202-9 [PMID: 13572792]
  16. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Apr;27(2):125-36 [PMID: 11296488]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 May;95(3):271-87 [PMID: 21547067]
  18. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jul;36(3):343-53 [PMID: 20658865]
  19. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Jul;38(3):279-91 [PMID: 22823421]
  20. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Feb;23(1):73-90; discussion 90-130 [PMID: 11303339]
  21. Behav Processes. 2012 May;90(1):130-41 [PMID: 22450305]
  22. Learn Behav. 2011 Mar;39(1):46-56 [PMID: 21264561]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Sep;28(2):155-61 [PMID: 16812022]

Grants

  1. R01 MH064847/NIMH NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0resurgenceL1operantmayeffectreinforcedExperimentfoundextensivetraining12sessionsbehaviorextinctioncansecondpressingleverextinguishedL2amountopposed4schedulereinforcement2grainpelletsucroseresultsResurgenceExtinctionInstrumentalConditioningundergonereturn"resurge"replacedundergoesphenomenonprovideinsightrelapseoccurincentivecontingencymanagementtherapieshumansThreeexperimentsratsexaminedimpactseveralvariablesstrengthonefirstalternativenowrespondingresponsesresurged1especiallystrongrandomratiovariableintervalmatchedrateinitial36Phaseallowedsubstantialapparentlyequivalent3changingidentityreinforcersuggestrobustnaturalworldhistorystillresurgeincentive-basedtherapydiscussedtermscurrentexplanationsFactorsModulatingStrengthBehaviorOperantRelapse

Similar Articles

Cited By