Magazine or journal--what is the difference? The role of the monitoring editor.

Anthony Bretscher
Author Information
  1. Anthony Bretscher: Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA. apb5@cornell.edu

Abstract

Scientific communication, career advancement, and funding decisions are all dependent on research publications. The way manuscripts are handled by high-visibility, professionally edited magazines differs from the way academic journals evaluate manuscripts, using active scientists as monitoring editors. In this essay, I discuss the benefits that come with the involvement of active scientists. I enumerate the decisions a monitoring editor has to make, and how he or she goes about making them. Finally, I indicate ways in which authors can help to make the process a smoother and more positive experience.

References

  1. Infect Immun. 2011 Oct;79(10):3855-9 [PMID: 21825063]
  2. Mol Biol Cell. 2011 Mar 1;22(5):525-7 [PMID: 21357757]
  3. Mol Biol Cell. 2012 Sep;23(17):3285-9 [PMID: 22936699]
  4. J Cell Biol. 2012 Jul 23;198(2):195-203 [PMID: 22801783]
  5. J Cell Biol. 1997 Oct 6;139(1):169-79 [PMID: 9314537]
  6. Science. 2008 Jul 4;321(5885):36 [PMID: 18599755]

Grants

  1. R01 GM036652/NIGMS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Biomedical Research
Decision Making
Editorial Policies
Humans
Peer Review, Research
Periodicals as Topic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0monitoringdecisionswaymanuscriptsactivescientistseditormakeScientificcommunicationcareeradvancementfundingdependentresearchpublicationshandledhigh-visibilityprofessionallyeditedmagazinesdiffersacademicjournalsevaluateusingeditorsessaydiscussbenefitscomeinvolvementenumerategoesmakingFinallyindicatewaysauthorscanhelpprocesssmootherpositiveexperienceMagazinejournal--whatdifference?role

Similar Articles

Cited By