Assessment by meta-analysis of interferon-gamma for the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis.

Si-Biao Su, Shan-Yu Qin, Xiao-Yun Guo, Wei Luo, Hai-Xing Jiang
Author Information
  1. Si-Biao Su: Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Province, China.

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the performance and diagnostic accuracy of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) for tuberculous peritonitis (TBP) by meta-analysis.
METHODS: A systematic search of English language studies was performed. We searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, BIOSIS, LILACS and the Cochrane Library. The Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy initiative and Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy tool were used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of the accuracy of IFN-γ concentration in the diagnosis of peritoneal effusion were pooled using random-effects models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to summarize overall test performance. Two reviewers independently judged study eligibility while screening the citations.
RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. The average inter-rater agreement between the two reviewers for items in the quality checklist was 0.92. Analysis of IFN-γ level for TBP diagnosis yielded a summary estimate: sensitivity, 0.93 (95%CI, 0.87-0.97); specificity, 0.99 (95%CI, 0.97-1.00); positive likelihood ratio (PLR), 41.49 (95%CI, 18.80-91.55); negative likelihood ratio (NLR), 0.11 (95%CI, 0.06-0.19); and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), 678.02 (95%CI, 209.91-2190.09). χ(2) values of the sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 5.66 (P = 0.3407), 6.37 (P = 0.2715), 1.38 (P = 0.9265), 5.46 (P = 0.3621) and 1.42 (P = 0.9220), respectively. The summary receiver ROC curve was positioned near the desirable upper left corner and the maximum joint sensitivity and specificity was 0.97. The area under the curve was 0.99. The evaluation of publication bias was not significant (P = 0.922).
CONCLUSION: IFN-γ may be a sensitive and specific marker for the accurate diagnosis of TBP. The level of IFN-γ may contribute to the accurate differentiation of tuberculosis (TB) ascites from non-TB ascites.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Apr 15;120(8):667-76 [PMID: 8135452]
  2. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Jun 08;5:20 [PMID: 15943861]
  3. BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):157-62 [PMID: 11463691]
  4. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Oct 15;22(8):685-700 [PMID: 16197489]
  5. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 May;37(5):453-60 [PMID: 11326181]
  6. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002 Jul 03;2:9 [PMID: 12097142]
  7. Arch Bronconeumol. 2008 Oct;44(10):551-66 [PMID: 19006636]
  8. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 May;57(5):461-9 [PMID: 15196616]
  9. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Nov;56(11):1129-35 [PMID: 14615004]
  10. Croat Med J. 2003 Oct;44(5):635-8 [PMID: 14515428]
  11. Tubercle. 1991 Sep;72(3):193-7 [PMID: 1771679]
  12. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 1994 Apr;24(1):93-105 [PMID: 8169454]
  13. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Mar;11(3):337-41 [PMID: 10333209]
  14. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Aug 17;291(6493):473-5 [PMID: 3160432]
  15. Tuberk Toraks. 2004;52(3):211-7 [PMID: 15351932]
  16. Nefrologia. 2011;31(2):169-73 [PMID: 21461010]
  17. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;40(8):705-10 [PMID: 16940883]
  18. Stat Med. 2001 Dec 15;20(23):3625-33 [PMID: 11746342]
  19. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2004 Mar 8;40(2):139-45 [PMID: 14987732]
  20. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 May;88(5):744-50 [PMID: 8480741]
  21. J Infect. 2009 Dec;59(6):409-15 [PMID: 19778553]
  22. Chest. 2002 Sep;122(3):900-5 [PMID: 12226030]
  23. J Med Case Rep. 2008 Jan 31;2:32 [PMID: 18237424]
  24. J Immunol. 1990 Jul 1;145(1):149-54 [PMID: 2113553]
  25. Indian J Med Res. 2004 Oct;120(4):316-53 [PMID: 15520485]
  26. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Aug;122(8):675-86 [PMID: 9701328]
  27. Indian J Med Res. 2004 Oct;120(4):305-15 [PMID: 15520484]
  28. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 [PMID: 9310563]
  29. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2006 Jul;26(7):484-8 [PMID: 16800787]
  30. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Oct 12;158(18):1967-8 [PMID: 9778194]
  31. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001 Jan;11(1):79-91 [PMID: 11175976]
  32. J Infect. 2009 Dec;59(6):402-8 [PMID: 19819258]
  33. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Dec 15;45(12):1559-67 [PMID: 18190316]
  34. J Med Microbiol. 2012 Apr;61(Pt 4):514-519 [PMID: 22174374]
  35. Gut. 1995 Mar;36(3):419-21 [PMID: 7698702]
  36. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Nov 10;3:25 [PMID: 14606960]
  37. Gastrointest Endosc. 1981 May;27(2):66-8 [PMID: 6453038]
  38. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000 Apr;4(4):361-70 [PMID: 10777087]
  39. J Clin Lab Anal. 2005;19(2):40-6 [PMID: 15756707]
  40. Probl Tuberk Bolezn Legk. 2006;(11):14-8 [PMID: 17195584]
  41. Respir Med. 2008 May;102(5):744-54 [PMID: 18222681]
  42. Gut. 1986 Sep;27(9):1049-53 [PMID: 3758818]

MeSH Term

Area Under Curve
Ascitic Fluid
Biomarkers
Humans
Interferon-gamma
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Observer Variation
Peritonitis, Tuberculous
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
ROC Curve
Reproducibility of Results

Chemicals

Biomarkers
IFNG protein, human
Interferon-gamma

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00P=IFN-γ95%CIspecificitydiagnosisperitonitisTBPstudiessensitivityratioperformancediagnosticaccuracyinterferon-gammatuberculousmeta-analysisDiagnosticAccuracyAssessmentqualityROCreviewerslevelsummary9799likelihoodPLRNLRDOR51curvemayaccurateascitesAIM:investigateMETHODS:systematicsearchEnglishlanguageperformedsearchedfollowingelectronicdatabases:MEDLINEEMBASEWebScienceBIOSISLILACSCochraneLibraryStandardsReportinginitiativeQualityStudiestoolusedassessmethodologicalSensitivitymeasuresconcentrationperitonealeffusionpooledusingrandom-effectsmodelsReceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurvesappliedsummarizeoveralltestTwoindependentlyjudgedstudyeligibilityscreeningcitationsRESULTS:Sixmetinclusioncriteriaaverageinter-rateragreementtwoitemschecklist92Analysisyieldedestimate:9387-097-100positive41491880-9155negative1106-019odds6780220991-219009χ2values6634076372715389265463621429220respectivelyreceiverpositionedneardesirableupperleftcornermaximumjointareaevaluationpublicationbiassignificant922CONCLUSION:sensitivespecificmarkercontributedifferentiationtuberculosisTBnon-TBDiagnosisInterferon-gammaMeta-analysisTuberculosisTuberculous

Similar Articles

Cited By