From regular text to artistic writing and artworks: Fourier statistics of images with low and high aesthetic appeal.

Tamara Melmer, Seyed A Amirshahi, Michael Koch, Joachim Denzler, Christoph Redies
Author Information
  1. Tamara Melmer: Experimental Aesthetics Group, Institute of Anatomy I, University of Jena School of Medicine, Jena University Hospital Jena, Germany.

Abstract

The spatial characteristics of letters and their influence on readability and letter identification have been intensely studied during the last decades. There have been few studies, however, on statistical image properties that reflect more global aspects of text, for example properties that may relate to its aesthetic appeal. It has been shown that natural scenes and a large variety of visual artworks possess a scale-invariant Fourier power spectrum that falls off linearly with increasing frequency in log-log plots. We asked whether images of text share this property. As expected, the Fourier spectrum of images of regular typed or handwritten text is highly anisotropic, i.e., the spectral image properties in vertical, horizontal, and oblique orientations differ. Moreover, the spatial frequency spectra of text images are not scale-invariant in any direction. The decline is shallower in the low-frequency part of the spectrum for text than for aesthetic artworks, whereas, in the high-frequency part, it is steeper. These results indicate that, in general, images of regular text contain less global structure (low spatial frequencies) relative to fine detail (high spatial frequencies) than images of aesthetics artworks. Moreover, we studied images of text with artistic claim (ornate print and calligraphy) and ornamental art. For some measures, these images assume average values intermediate between regular text and aesthetic artworks. Finally, to answer the question of whether the statistical properties measured by us are universal amongst humans or are subject to intercultural differences, we compared images from three different cultural backgrounds (Western, East Asian, and Arabic). Results for different categories (regular text, aesthetic writing, ornamental art, and fine art) were similar across cultures.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 19;5(8):e12268 [PMID: 20808863]
  2. J Vis. 2007 Jul 30;7(2):16.1-9 [PMID: 18217831]
  3. Sci Am. 2002 Dec;287(6):116-21 [PMID: 12469654]
  4. Perception. 2007;36(12):1788-803 [PMID: 18283929]
  5. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Sep 12;5:98 [PMID: 21941476]
  6. Am Nat. 2006 May;167(5):E117-39 [PMID: 16671005]
  7. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Apr;13(2):144-9 [PMID: 12744966]
  8. J Vis. 2010 Nov 02;10(13):2 [PMID: 21149306]
  9. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Nov;34(4):509-17 [PMID: 12564555]
  10. Vision Res. 2006 Dec;46(28):4646-74 [PMID: 16808957]
  11. Chaos. 2005 Dec;15(4):043702 [PMID: 16396592]
  12. J Vis. 2008 Oct 17;8(13):3.1-20 [PMID: 19146333]
  13. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 Dec;4(12):2379-94 [PMID: 3430225]
  14. Spat Vis. 2007;21(1-2):149-64 [PMID: 18073056]
  15. Vision Res. 2007 Feb;47(4):437-51 [PMID: 17223153]
  16. Science. 2000 Feb 18;287(5456):1273-6 [PMID: 10678835]
  17. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 7;272(1560):267-75 [PMID: 15705551]
  18. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Oct;21(10):2307-12 [PMID: 21368088]
  19. J Vis. 2009 Aug 13;9(9):4.1-19 [PMID: 19761337]
  20. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006 Sep;23(9):2085-96 [PMID: 16912735]
  21. Perception. 2008;37(7):1098-113 [PMID: 18773732]
  22. Network. 1996 May;7(2):333-9 [PMID: 16754394]
  23. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 12;31(41):14745-53 [PMID: 21994390]
  24. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992 Apr;12(2):229-32 [PMID: 1408179]
  25. Curr Biol. 2000 Jan 13;10(1):35-8 [PMID: 10660301]
  26. Network. 2007 Sep;18(3):235-48 [PMID: 17852751]
  27. Spat Vis. 2007;21(1-2):137-48 [PMID: 18073055]
  28. Nature. 1994 Jun 2;369(6479):395-7 [PMID: 8196766]
  29. J Vis. 2009 Aug 28;9(9):16.1-19 [PMID: 19761349]
  30. Perception. 2008;37(9):1341-52 [PMID: 18986061]
  31. Appl Opt. 1987 Jan 1;26(1):157-70 [PMID: 20454092]
  32. Spat Vis. 2007;21(1-2):97-117 [PMID: 18073053]
  33. Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 1;63(2):979-88 [PMID: 22480729]
  34. Vision Res. 2011 Aug 1;51(15):1767-77 [PMID: 21684303]
  35. Perception. 2010;39(7):884-99 [PMID: 20842966]
  36. Vision Res. 2010 Jul 21;50(16):1503-9 [PMID: 20580643]
  37. Vision Res. 2002 Apr;42(9):1165-84 [PMID: 11997055]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0textimagesspatialaestheticartworksregularpropertiesartFourierspectrumfrequencyornamentalwritingstudiedstatisticalimageglobalappealscale-invariantwhetherMoreoverpartlowfrequenciesfinehighaestheticsartisticcalligraphydifferentcharacteristicslettersinfluencereadabilityletteridentificationintenselylastdecadesstudieshoweverreflectaspectsexamplemayrelateshownnaturalsceneslargevarietyvisualpossesspowerfallslinearlyincreasinglog-logplotsaskedsharepropertyexpectedtypedhandwrittenhighlyanisotropiciespectralverticalhorizontalobliqueorientationsdifferspectradirectiondeclineshallowerlow-frequencywhereashigh-frequencysteeperresultsindicategeneralcontainlessstructurerelativedetailclaimornateprintmeasuresassumeaveragevaluesintermediateFinallyanswerquestionmeasuredusuniversalamongsthumanssubjectinterculturaldifferencescomparedthreeculturalbackgroundsWesternEastAsianArabicResultscategoriessimilaracrossculturesartworks:statisticsabstractexperimentalscaleinvariancesystems

Similar Articles

Cited By