Cost-utility analysis of 10- and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: protection at what price in the Thai context?

Wantanee Kulpeng, Pattara Leelahavarong, Waranya Rattanavipapong, Vorasith Sornsrivichai, Henry C Baggett, Aronrag Meeyai, Warunee Punpanich, Yot Teerawattananon
Author Information
  1. Wantanee Kulpeng: Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), 6th Floor, 6th Building, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Rd., Muang, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand. wantanee.k@hitap.net

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the costs and outcomes of offering the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in Thailand compared to the current situation of no PCV vaccination.
METHODS: Two vaccination schedules were considered: two-dose primary series plus a booster dose (2+1) and three-dose primary series plus a booster dose (3+1). A cost-utility analysis was conducted using a societal perspective. A Markov simulation model was used to estimate the relevant costs and health outcomes for a lifetime horizon. Costs were collected and values were calculated for the year 2010. The results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in Thai Baht (THB) per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained, with future costs and outcomes being discounted at 3% per annum. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation were performed to assess parameter uncertainty.
RESULTS: Under the base case-scenario of 2+1 dose schedule and a five-year protection, without indirect vaccine effects, the ICER for PCV10 and PCV13 were THB 1,368,072 and THB 1,490,305 per QALY gained, respectively. With indirect vaccine effects, the ICER of PCV10 was THB 519,399, and for PCV13 was THB 527,378. The model was sensitive to discount rate, the change in duration of vaccine protection and the incidence of pneumonia for all age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: At current prices, PCV10 and PCV13 are not cost-effective in Thailand. Inclusion of indirect vaccine effects substantially reduced the ICERs for both vaccines, but did not result in cost effectiveness.

References

  1. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91 Suppl 2:S11-5 [PMID: 19253483]
  2. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005;37(11-12):821-32 [PMID: 16308215]
  3. Vaccine. 2011 Sep 2;29(38):6686-94 [PMID: 21745516]
  4. Lancet. 2007 Apr 7;369(9568):1179-86 [PMID: 17416262]
  5. Vaccine. 2007 Mar 22;25(13):2451-7 [PMID: 17023095]
  6. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Mar;19(3):187-95 [PMID: 10749457]
  7. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Nov;93 Suppl 5:S6-12 [PMID: 21298830]
  8. Vaccine. 2011 Dec 6;29(52):9600-6 [PMID: 21933696]
  9. Vaccine. 2003 Jun 2;21(19-20):2564-72 [PMID: 12744892]
  10. Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):e1103-10 [PMID: 19482744]
  11. Vaccine. 2007 Jan 26;25(7):1275-80 [PMID: 17092618]
  12. Vaccine. 2010 Apr 26;28(19):3440-4 [PMID: 20199759]
  13. Value Health. 2008 Sep-Oct;11(5):898-903 [PMID: 18489504]
  14. Vaccine. 2007 May 4;25(18):3669-78 [PMID: 17360082]
  15. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 8;344(6):403-9 [PMID: 11172176]
  16. Clin Ther. 2003 Oct;25(10):2614-30 [PMID: 14667962]
  17. Vaccine. 2012 Mar 2;30(11):1936-43 [PMID: 22266291]
  18. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Mar 15;38(6):830-5 [PMID: 14999627]
  19. Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Feb;9(1):7-15 [PMID: 17333089]
  20. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Feb;25(2):176-8 [PMID: 16462300]
  21. BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Sep 21;11:248 [PMID: 21936928]
  22. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 1;348(18):1737-46 [PMID: 12724479]
  23. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;11(10):760-8 [PMID: 21621466]
  24. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91 Suppl 2:S1-3 [PMID: 19255984]
  25. Vaccine. 2011 Jul 12;29(31):4963-72 [PMID: 21621575]
  26. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2008 Jul;39(4):706-18 [PMID: 19058610]
  27. Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40(9):721-9 [PMID: 18712627]
  28. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Mar 1;48 Suppl 2:S65-74 [PMID: 19191621]
  29. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002 Sep;21(9):810-5 [PMID: 12352800]
  30. Vaccine. 2004 Mar 12;22(9-10):1138-49 [PMID: 15003641]
  31. Vaccine. 2011 Sep 14;29 Suppl 3:C35-42 [PMID: 21896351]
  32. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Aug;83(2):301-6 [PMID: 20682872]
  33. Value Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;7(1):36-51 [PMID: 14720129]
  34. Vaccine. 2010 Jul 26;28(33):5485-90 [PMID: 20554066]
  35. BMJ. 2010 Jun 02;340:c2509 [PMID: 20519267]

Grants

  1. CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Humans
Immunization Schedule
Incidence
Male
Monte Carlo Method
Pneumococcal Infections
Pneumococcal Vaccines
Pneumonia, Pneumococcal
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Thailand
Vaccination
Vaccines, Conjugate

Chemicals

10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
13-valent pneumococcal vaccine
Pneumococcal Vaccines
Vaccines, Conjugate

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccineTHBPCV10PCV13analysiscostsoutcomespneumococcalconjugatedoseperprotectionindirecteffects13-valentThailandcurrentvaccinationprimaryseriesplusbooster2+1usingsimulationmodelyearICERsThaiQALYgainedsensitivityICER1OBJECTIVE:studyaimsevaluateoffering10-valentcomparedsituationPCVMETHODS:Twoschedulesconsidered:two-dosethree-dose3+1cost-utilityconductedsocietalperspectiveMarkovusedestimaterelevanthealthlifetimehorizonCostscollectedvaluescalculated2010resultsreportedincrementalcost-effectivenessratiosBahtqualityadjustedlifefuturediscounted3%annumOne-wayprobabilisticMonteCarloperformedassessparameteruncertaintyRESULTS:basecase-scenarioschedulefive-yearwithout368072490305respectively519399527378sensitivediscountratechangedurationincidencepneumoniaagegroupsCONCLUSIONS:pricescost-effectiveInclusionsubstantiallyreducedvaccinesresultcosteffectivenessCost-utility10-vaccines:pricecontext?

Similar Articles

Cited By